OTRUBAv.HINTONDownload PDFBoard of Patent Appeals and InterferencesNov 5, 199808443317 (B.P.A.I. Nov. 5, 1998) Copy Citation Patent No. 5,486,253, granted January 23, 1996, based on1 Application 08/443,317, filed May 17, 1995. Assignor to B&H Mfg. Co., Ceres, CA. Application 08/615,918, filed March 14, 1996. Accorded2 benefit of Application 08/327,267, filed October 21, 1994, now U.S. Patent No. 5,538,575, granted July 23, 1996. Assignor to Trine Mfg. Co. 1 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 20 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ SVATOBOJ OTRUBA Junior Party1 v. GAYLEN R. HINTON Senior Party2 _____________ Interference No. 104,045 ______________ Interference No. 104,045 2 Before CALVERT, PATE and MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judges. CALVERT, Administrative Patent Judge. JUDGMENT Since Otruba has not filed a response to the order to show cause issued on September 24, 1998 (Paper No. 19), and the time set for filing a response has expired, this case is taken up for the entry of judgment. In Paper No. 19, the Otruba motion under 37 CFR § 1.633(c)(4) to designate claims 12 to 15 of his involved patent as not corresponding to the count was granted as to claims 12 to 14. Accordingly, the interference is redeclared herewith to reflect that decision. In view of the Joint Concession of Unpatentability of the Count (Paper No. 16), and the redeclaration herewith, it is hereby adjudged, pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.662(a), that the junior party, Svatoboj Otruba, is not entitled to claims 1, 4 to 11 and 15 of his involved patent, designated as correspond- Interference No. 104,045 3 ing to the count, and Gaylen Roy Hinton, the senior party, is not entitled to claims 29 to 40 of his involved application, designated as corresponding to the count. IAN A. CALVERT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT WILLIAM F. PATE III ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFER- ENCES ) ) ) JOHN C. MARTIN ) Administrative Patent Judge ) Interference No. 104,045 4 psb Interference No. 104,045 5 Attorney for Otruba: Kevin J. Heinl Brooks & Kushman 1000 Town Center 22nd Floor Southfield, MI 48075 Attorney for Hinton: Morgan & Finnegan 345 Park Avenue New York, NY 10154-0053 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation