Ole Henriksen of Denmark, Inc.Download PDFTrademark Trial and Appeal BoardJan 10, 2011No. 77686786 (T.T.A.B. Jan. 10, 2011) Copy Citation Mailed: January 10, 2011 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ________ In re Ole Henriksen of Denmark, Inc. ________ Serial No. 77686786 _______ Douglas H. Morseburg of Sheldon Mak Rose & Anderson PC for Ole Henriksen of Denmark, Inc. Andrea P. Butler, Trademark Examining Attorney, Law Office 102 (Karen M. Strzyz, Managing Attorney). _______ Before Walters, Taylor and Bergsman, Administrative Trademark Judges. Opinion by Bergsman, Administrative Trademark Judge: Ole Henriksen of Denmark, Inc. (“applicant”) filed an intent-to-use application for the mark FEEL THE DIFFERENCE, in standard character form, for “non-medicated skin care preparations, namely a facial mask for hydrating and firming facial skin,” in Class 3. The Trademark Examining Attorney refused to register applicant’s mark under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act of 1946, 15 U.S.C. §1052(d), on the ground that applicant’s mark is likely to cause confusion with the mark FEEL THE DIFFERENCE, in standard character form, for “nutritional THIS OPINION IS NOT A PRECEDENT OF THE TTAB Serial No. 77686786 2 supplements; dietary supplements; herbal supplements; mineral supplements; multi-vitamins; vitamins; dietary and herbal supplements; herbal and plant derived products, namely herbal nutritional supplements; food supplements, namely, anti-oxidants; homeopathic supplements; nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement; nutritional food bars for use as a meal replacement; nutritional meal replacement powders,” in Class 5.1 Our determination of likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) is based on an analysis of all of the probative facts in evidence that are relevant to the factors bearing on the issue of likelihood of confusion. In re E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563, 567 (CCPA 1973); see also, In re Majestic Distilling Company, Inc., 315 F.3d 1311, 65 USPQ2d 1201, 1203 (Fed. Cir. 2003). In any likelihood of confusion analysis, two key considerations are the similarities between the marks and the similarities between the goods. See Federated Foods, Inc. v. Fort Howard Paper Co., 544 F.2d 1098, 192 USPQ 24, 29 (CCPA 1976) (“The fundamental inquiry mandated by §2(d) goes to the cumulative effect of 1 Registration No. 3360909, issued December 25, 2007. The registration also includes mail order services and online retail store services in the field of nutritional supplements, etc. in Class 35. Serial No. 77686786 3 differences in the essential characteristics of the goods and differences in the marks”). A. The similarity or dissimilarity of the marks in their entireties as to appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. The marks are identical. B. The similarity or dissimilarity and nature of the goods described in the application and registration, the channels of trade and classes of consumers. Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely a facial mask for hydrating and firming facial skin2 and nutritional supplements, etc. are clearly different products. However, in the likelihood of confusion analysis, it is not necessary that the respective goods be identical or competitive, or even that they move in the same channels of trade to support a holding of likelihood of confusion. It is sufficient that the respective goods are related in some manner, and/or that the conditions and activities surrounding the marketing of the goods are such that they would or could be encountered by the same persons under circumstances that could, because of the similarity of the marks, give rise to the mistaken belief that they 2 Hydrating skin means maintaining or restoring the normal proportion of fluid in the body. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (Unabridged), p, 1107 (1993). The Board may take judicial notice of dictionary evidence. University of Notre Dame du Lac v. J. C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 213 USPQ 594, 596 (TTAB 1982), aff’d, 703 F.2d 1372, 217 USPQ 505 (Fed. Cir. 1983). Serial No. 77686786 4 originated from the same producer. In re Melville Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1386, 1388 (TTAB 1991). Moreover, where as here, the marks are identical, applicant’s goods and registrant’s goods do not have to be as similar to support a finding of likelihood of confusion. In re Opus One, Inc., 60 USPQ2d 1812, 1815 (TTAB 2001); In re Concordia International Forwarding Corp., 222 USPQ 355, 356 (TTAB 1983). In other words, even when the goods are not intrinsically related, the use of identical marks can lead to the assumption that there is a common source. In re Shell Oil Co., 992 F.2d 1024, 26 USPQ2d 1687, 1689 (Fed. Cir. 1993). As discussed below, in this case, the evidence shows that the goods are, in fact, related. The Examining Attorney has submitted numerous use- based, third-party registrations for products listed in both the application and registration at issue. Third- party registrations which individually cover a number of different services that are based on use in commerce may have some probative value to the extent that they serve to suggest that the listed services are of a type which may emanate from the same source. In re Albert Trostel & Sons Co., 29 USPQ2d 1783, 1785-1786 (TTAB 1993); In re Mucky Serial No. 77686786 5 Duck Mustard Co. Inc., 6 USPQ2d 1467, 1470 n.6 (TTAB 1988). The registrations listed below are representative.3 Mark Reg. No. Goods EURO PHARMA 2800979 Dietary, herbal, mineral and nutritional supplements; non- medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin lotions, emollients, gels, moisturizers, toners, and conditioners DERMALOGICA 3466148 Non-medicated skin care preparations, skin creams, skin moisturizers, skin masques, skin care lotions; dietary supplements SUNMARK 2941616 Non-medicated skin care lotions, creams and masks; vitamins, minerals and dietary supplements TEACEUTICALS 3199451 Skin care products, namely, creams, oils, moisturizers, and lotions; dietary supplements and vitamins FACELOGIC 3240521 Non-medicated skin care products, namely, skin lotions, skin creams, skin toners, skin masks, skin cleansers and skin serums; dietary health supplements and vitamin supplements The Examining Attorney also submitted the following evidence to show that the goods in the application and registration are related: 3 We have not included the entire description of goods for each of the registrations. Only the goods in both applicant’s application and registrant’s registration are listed. Serial No. 77686786 6 1. An excerpt from the Suite101.com website. This appears to be a website providing information regarding, inter alia, health and beauty. The excerpt submitted is a February 3, 2009 article by Wei Yin Wong entitled “Supplements for Skin: Skincare through Vitamins and Minerals.” The subject of the article is that vitamin and mineral supplements can help keep one’s skin healthy. The website also provides links to other websites for skin care products. 2. An excerpt from the LifeExtension website (lef.org), self-professed authority on health and nutrition. Life extension is a global authority on nutrition, health and wellness as well as a provider of scientific information on anti-aging supplements and therapies. We supply only the highest quality nutritional supplements, including minerals, vitamins, herbs and hormones. In addition, LifeExtension provides skin care products for use in conjunction with its dietary supplements. 3. An Ezine article by Jerrick Foo entitled “Anti- Aging Skin Care Supplements” (Ezinesarticles.com). This appears to be an “infomercial” type of communication to promote Mr. Foo's skin care website. The subject of this article is that people may rejuvenate their skin with Serial No. 77686786 7 “hydrating skin care products and anti-aging skin care supplements.” The website also provides links to other websites for skin care products. 4. An excerpt from the evitamins.com website advertising the sale of vitamins designed as “Vitamin Skincare Formulas.” The evitamins.com retailer also advertises the sale of skin care facial moisturizers and creams. 5. An excerpt from the target.com website advertising a skin moisturizer containing “Vitamin C+.” 6. An article in Buzzle.com by Rebecca Prescott entitled “Health And Beauty Products – Do Vitamin E Creams Work?” The article analyzes whether vitamin E, a purportedly popular ingredient in many skincare creams, is effective. 7. An excerpt from the Answers.com website regarding “Vitamin E skin cream, ointment, or gel.” This excerpt discusses the effect of applying vitamin E to the skin through creams, ointments and gels. At the end of the discussion, the website includes links to skincare products containing vitamin E. 8. An excerpt from the Avon.com website advertising the sale of skincare products containing various vitamins (e.g., vitamins A, B5, C, D and E). Serial No. 77686786 8 9. An excerpt from the MarioBadescu.com website advertising the sale of a skin cream containing vitamins A and E. 10. An excerpt from the Sephora.com website advertising the sale of “skincare supplements” (i.e., dietary supplements) and face creams and moisturizers. 11. An excerpt from the Thisthatandeverything.com website advertising the sale of skincare products and vitamin supplements. The different products were advertised together. 12. An excerpt from the Puritan.com website advertising the sale skin care products and vitamin and mineral supplements all under the PURITAN PRIDE trademark. 13. An excerpt from the Your-celluite-solution.com website advertising the sale of MURAD skin creams and supplements. The advertisement claims that the “combination of supplements and topical cream will encourage the appearance of firmer skin.” 14. An excerpt from the SkinCareRx.org website entitled “Vitamins in Skin Care: How they Help.” The excerpt discusses the role of vitamins in skin care. The website includes links to other websites that appear to be selling skin care products. Serial No. 77686786 9 15. An excerpt from the Bosciaskincare.com website advertising the sale of BOSCIA supplements and skin care masks. 16. An excerpt from the AromaBella.com website advertising the sale of a skin care “masque” containing vitamins and minerals. 17. An excerpt from the Zao.AnzaoHealth.com website advertising the sale of ZAO brand skin care products and dietary supplements. 18. An excerpt from the Jaliman.com website advertising the sale of DEBRA JALIMAN M.D. brand dietary supplements and skin care products, including a mask. 19. An excerpt from the Bindi.com website advertising the sale of BINDI brand skin care products, including a facial mask, and nutritional supplements. The evidence shows that nutritional supplements, vitamins and skin care products emanate from the same sources, that nutritional supplements and vitamins are ingredients in skin care products, that nutritional supplements, vitamins, and skin care products may be used together in a skin care regime, that nutritional supplements, vitamins and skin care products are sold by the same retailers to the same consumers. Serial No. 77686786 10 C. Balancing the factors. In view of the identity of the marks, the relatedness of the goods, and the similarity of the channels of trade and the classes of consumers, we find that registration of applicant’s mark FEEL THE DIFFERENCE for “non-medicated skin care preparations, namely a facial mask for hydrating and firming facial skin” so resembles the registered mark FEEL THE DIFFERENCE for “nutritional supplements; dietary supplements; herbal supplements; mineral supplements; multi-vitamins; vitamins; dietary and herbal supplements; herbal and plant derived products, namely herbal nutritional supplements; food supplements, namely, anti- oxidants; homeopathic supplements; nutritional drink mix for use as a meal replacement; nutritional food bars for use as a meal replacement; nutritional meal replacement powders” as to be likely to cause confusion. Decision: The refusal to register is affirmed. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation