Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 22, 194242 N.L.R.B. 750 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter Of OKLAHoi%rA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY and INTERNA- TIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS OF OKLAHOMA CITY, LOCAL B-1141 Cases Nos IL-3955 and R-3956 -Decided July 22, 1942 Jurisdiction . gas and electric utility industry Investigation and Certification of Representatives : existence of question dis- .agreement with respect to scope of appropriate unit, elections necessary Units Appropriate for Collective Bargaining : (1) Geographic divisional unit comprising gioundmen, linemen appientice linemen, truck drivers, meter in- stalleis, and seivice men, and (2) unit comprising floating crews operating throughout system-held appropriate in view of extent of organization and the fact that they were cleaily identified gioups haling sufficient integration to baigain as independent units Mr Streeter B Flynn, Mr Robei t 11! Rainey, and All, L J Sartain, of Oklahoma City, Okla, for the Company Mr A F Edwards and Mr Tom M Rushing, of Oklahoma City, Okla, for the Union Mrs Augusta Spaulding, of counsel to the Board DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon petitions duly filed by International Biotheihood of Elec- trical Workers of Oklahoma City, Local B-1141, herein called the Union, each allegingthat a question affecting commerce had aI isen con- cernin'g the representation of employees of Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, herein called the Company, the National Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate con- solidated hearing upon due notice before Clifford W Potter, Trial Examiner Said hearing was held at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, on June 11, 1942 The Company and the Union appeared, participated, and were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross- examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues .The Trial Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed 42N L R B,No 146 750 OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 751 Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following -FINDINGS of FACT J THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company is engaged, in the production, transmission , and distribution of electiic energy, seivuig 209 cities and towns in Oklahoma and 22 cities and to*ns in Arkansas, all of which are connected by transmission lines and operated as one inter- connected system The Company serves approximately 172,000 cus- tomers, among which aie railways, telephone systems, post offices, and oil pipe lines, all of which are engaged in interstate commerce. The Company generates electric current in 5 main generating stations In addition to such current, the Company interchanges electric curient with` Kansas Gas and Electric Company, Arkansas City, Kansas, and with Southwestern Gas and Electric Company, Fort Smith, Arkansas. The Company admits that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 11 THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of Oklahoma City, Local B-1141, is a labor organization affiliated with the Ameri- can Federation of Labor, admitting to membership employees of the Company. M. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION In August 1941 the Union held a. meeting for employees of the Com- pany at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, and thereafter meetings at Fort Smith, Arkansas, for employees in the Utility Crew.' In September or October 1941 the Union began organizing employees at Enid, Okla- homa, the center of the Northern Division of the Company's opera- tions The Company and the Union disagree with respect to the scope of the appropriate unit A statement prepared by the Trial Examiner and lead into the record at the hearing indicates that the Union repiesents a substan- tial number of employees in each of the units herein found to be appropriate 2 ' The Utility Crew is also known in the i ecord is tl.e utility department z The Union submitted to the Trial Examiner 51 authorization cards, of which 39 bear apparently genuine signatures of employeees on the Company 's pay roll Of these 39 cards, 14 bear the names of employees on a current pay roll of the Northern Division , listing 42 employees , and 25 bear the names of employees on a current pay roll for the Utility Crew listing 82 employees The Company contends that the Union has not shown a sufficient interest in its em- ployees to support the petition filed herein we find no merit in this contention The 752 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD We find that a question affecting commerce has al isen concei nmg the representation of employees of the Company within the, meaning of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act IV THE APPROPRIATE UNITS The Union contends (1) that all groundmen, linemen, apprentice linemen, truck drivers, meter installers, and servicemen employed in the Northern Division of the Company, excluding supeivisory, office, and clerical employees, constitute an appropriate bargaining unit and (2) that all employees in the Utility Crew in Oklahoma City, consist- ing of floating crews operating throughout the properties of the Com- pany, excluding supervisory, clerical, and office employees, constitute an appropriate bargaining unit The Company contends that a unit restricted to the Northern Division of its operations and a unit re- stricted to the Utility Crew are both inappropriate and that the appro- priate unit should include all employees in the same work categories wherever such men are working in the Company's employ. The Company's headquarters are at Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, in the central part of the State From Oklahoma City the Company operates its entire system as an integrated unit for uniform public service The Company, has five mayor power plants, auxiliary plants, and some stand-by plants to be used for emergencies or when maximum power is needed The Company is connected with Kansas Gas and Electric Company on the north at Arkansas City, Kansas; with Public Service Company at Tulsa, Oklahoma, with Southwestern Gas and Electric Company at Fort Smith, Arkansas, and with Southwestern Light and Power Company at Oklahoma City. For administrative purposes the Company divides its transmission operations into geographical divisions Division superintendents re- poi t to the superintendent of the transmission and distribution de- partment at Oklahoma City The Northern Division of the Com- pany's operations at the time of the hearing embraced the territory between the Cimarron and Arkansas Rivers, in, the north central part of the State The Northern Division contains 35 to 40 towns 'The Utility Crew is a labor pool of regular employees Before its formation the Company employed extra men in each locality . where, extra men were needed, and discharged them when the work was Board does not require that a petitioning labor organization seeking an election submit evidence of majority representation among employees in an appropriate unit, but that it show a substantial representation to raise the possibility that a bargaining representative may be selected in an election and that therefore an election directed by the Board would not be a vain procedure See Matter of A M kin and Garrison Siskin, doing business as R H S2skin d Sons, and Steel Workers Organizing,Convn,4ttee (C 1 0 ) 41 N L R B 187, and cases cited therein OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 753 done The Utility Crew is made up of small work crews 3 A work crew is sent into any division where repair or construction work is to be done to supplement the local division force A crew"working in a division is under the supervision of the division manager At times only one or two men may be sent from the Utility Crew to supplement division men Men on the Utility Clew work from established head- quarters When they, work away ftom headquarters they are compen- sated for their additional expenses The Company pays the moving expenses of the Utility Crew to new headquarters The Utility Crew does no metei work Meter work is not restricted to any one category' of employees in the geographical divisions Otherwise, the Utility, Crew performs work similar to that done by employees in the same categories in the geographical divisions Transfers fi om one geographical division to another and from a division to the Utility Crew are frequent Such transfers are neces- sary for fluctuation in the amount of work requned locally, for vaca- tion periods, and for promotions Storms create the need of emerg- ency transfer to afflicted areas at different times of the year It clearly appears, and the Union concedes, that a system-wide unit is ultimately appropriate for bargaining among the electrical em- ployees of the Company whose work interests are related both by the similarity of their work and by their common association in a closely integrated enterprise While the Union is engaged in organizing the Company's electrical employees in the several geographical divisions of its system, the Union does not claim at this time to represent a majority of the Company's employees in any definable division other than the Northern Division and the Utility Crew Since it appears that employees in the Northern Division and employees in the Utility Crew are clearly identified groups and have sufficient integration to bargain with the Company as independent separate units, we see nb reason to defer the collective bargaining of employees in these di- visions until employees throughout the Company's electrical system evince a similar desire for collective bargaining Accordingly two separate bargaining units limited respectively to employees in the Northern Division and to employees in the Utility Crew are now appropriate in order that such employees may immediately have the privilege of 'collective bargaining with the Company The deter= mination of these separate bargaining units shall not, however, be deemed prejudicial to the later determination, upon appropriate pro- ceedings, of a system-wide unit of electrical employees of the Company 8 A work crew consists of five linemen, two truck drivers, two groundmen , a handyman, a foreman , and a timekeeper 472814-42-vol 42-48 754 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD when the self-organization of its employees is coextensive with its electrical operations I At the hearing the Company and the Union agreed that, in the event the Board found that a unit restricted to employees in the North- ern Division and a unit restricted to employees in the Utility Crew constituted separate bargaining units, employees listed on Appendix A should be excluded from the unit for electrical employees in the Northern Division and that employees listed on Appendix B should be excluded from the unit foi electrical employees in the Utility Crew. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, we shall exclude such employees from the respective units which we find appropriate for collective bargaining. We find that all groundmen, linemen, appientice linemen, truck drivers, meter installers, and service men employed in the Northern Division of the Company, excluding supervisory, office, and clerical employees and employees listed on Appendix A, constitute a unit ap- propriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act We further find that all employees in the Utility Crew in Oklahoma City, consisting of floating crews, operating throughout the properties of the Company, excluding super- visory, clerical, and office employees and employees listed on Appendix B, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We find that the question concerning representation which has arisen can best be resolved by separate elections by secret ballot among all employees of the Company within each appropriate unit who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Elections subject to the limitations and additions set forth therein DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat ` 449, and pursuant to Article III, Section 8, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended, it is hereby DIRECTED that, as gait of the ilI\estigatlon to ascertain representa- tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Oklahoma Gas * See Matter of Southern California Gas Company and Utility Workers Organizinq Com- mittee, 31 N L R B 461, Matter of Appalachian Electric Power Co and International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, L U B 1182 (A F L ), 38 N L R B 630, and Matter of Florida Power & Light Company and D2ctribution Department Employees Association of Florida Power it Light Company ( Greater Jliam-c Area ) et al, 42 N L R B 742 OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 755 3z Electric Company, Oklahoma City , Oklahoma, separate elections by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible , but not later than thirty ( 30) days from the date of this Direction , under the direc- tion and supervision of the Region al'Director for the Sixteenth Region, acting in this mattei as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III, Section 9, of said Rules and Regulations, among all employees of the Company within each of the two units found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during such pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or in the active military service or training of the United States , or tempoiarily laid off , but excluding employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause , to deter- mine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers of Oklahoma City. Local B-1141, for the purposes of collective bargaining. APPENDIX A Name Job Classifcataon G F Brock------------------------------ Line Foreman C G Thompson-------------------------- District Superintendent L E Deck------------------------------- General Foreman Lestei Blue------------------------------ Switchman Frank Harp------------------------------ Do C K Lovelace--------------------------- Chief Electrician B G Spence----------------------------- Engineer" E D Dixon------------------------------ Do W A McCullar-------------------------- Do L M Fullenwider------------------------ Garage Foieman S F Patterson ------------ ------------ - Mechanic F M Carver----------------------------- Do Tom McGoffin--------------------------- Janitor Lloyd C Garvin-------------------------- Do APPENDIX B Name Job Classification Steve Hughes---------------------------- Foreman J C Barnes------------------------------ Do T 0 Gandy------------------------------ Do H K Deason---------------------------- Do E F Redding____________________________ Do Lester Striegel--------------------------- Do E V Hoben------------------------------ Field Clerk C C Neal------------------------------- Do Ralph Schilling--------------------------- Timekeeper Willis (Willie) Baldwin------------------ Assistant Foreman C D Hooper----------------------------- Laborer George M Davis------------------------- Do H If Wood------------------------------ Do J F Billings----------------------------- ' Do 756 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD- TEMPORARY Name -lob Classiftation G B Bennett---------------------------- Laboiei Nutes Stanley---------------------------- Do Foster Young------------- W W Sizemore---------------------c---- Do A M Wisdom--------------------------- Do S 0 Brady------------------------------ Do H E Robinson--------------------------- Do J E Watson----------------------------- Do W B Evans----------------------------- Do 0 D Bell- ------------------------------ Do P H SpeirS----------------------------- Do E R .McMurtrey------------------------- Do 11I N Futch------------------------------ Watchman W W Pierce----------------------------- Do W T Shirley----------------------------- Laborer W F Williams--------------------------- Do J W Johnson---------------------------- Do B L Hess------------------------------- Do A J Robbins----------------------------- Do E L Stockton--------------------------- Do I. R Young------------------------------ Do Jason Elder, Jr-------------------------- Do J L Ryan------------------------=------ Do A P Hart------------------------------- Do R F Enlow------------------------------ Do S F Smith------------------------------ Do D W Sutton ----------------------------- Do A L Collins----------------------------- ` Do I. A Worley----------------------------- Do A N Askew------------------------------ Do T A Swindell--------------------------- Do L B Johnson---------------------------- Do C D Armstrong--------------------------' Do Roy Gunn-------------------------------- Do Cole Niblett------------------------------ Do Royle Ellis------------------------------- Do W E Castiloe---------------------------- Teamster Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation