Naomi R. Turner, Appellant,v.Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 1, 1998
05980740 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 1, 1998)

05980740

10-01-1998

Naomi R. Turner, Appellant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.


Naomi R. Turner v. Department of the Army

05980740

October 1, 1998

Naomi R. Turner, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Request No. 05980740

) Appeal No. 01975182

Louis Caldera, ) Agency No. BHAAFO9511F0430

Secretary, )

Department of the Army, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On May 11, 1998, Naomi R. Turner (appellant) timely initiated a request

to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to reconsider the

decision in Turner v. Department of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. 01975182

(March 23, 1998). Appellant received the previous decision on April

11, 1998. EEOC Regulations provide that the Commissioners may,

in their discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision.

29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party requesting reconsideration must submit

written argument or evidence which tends to establish one or more of the

following three criteria: 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1) (new and material

evidence is available that was not readily available when the previous

decision was issued); 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2) (the previous decision

involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation or material fact,

or misapplication of established policy); and 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3)

(the previous decision is of such exceptional nature as to have

substantial precedential implications). Appellant's request is denied.

The record indicates that appellant received the final agency decision

(FAD) on May 14, 1997. The FAD provided appellant with the correct

address of the Commission and the appropriate 30 day time frame for

filing an appeal. Appellant's appeal to the Commission was postmarked

June 17, 1997. The previous decision found that appellant's appeal was

untimely filed with the Commission and that appellant failed to submit

justification to invoke waiver or equitable tolling. Appellant's appeal

was dismissed.

In her request for reconsideration, appellant asserts she has been

unable to get a copy of the 29 C.F.R. �1614 regulations. Specifically,

appellant requests a copy of 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a). The Commission notes

that the final agency decision contains a bold heading "Section 1614.402

Time for appeals to the Commission" and contains the language of the

regulation. Appellant references health problems, but information she

submitted later deals with her health in 1996 and does not explain her

delay in filing her appeal. Appellant has failed to submit justification

for extending the time limits.

After a review of appellant's request for reconsideration, the previous

decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds appellant's request

does not meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c), and it is the

decision of the Commission to deny appellant's request. The decision

of the Commission in Appeal No. 01975182 remains the Commission's final

decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal from the

decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Oct. 1, 1998

_______________ ______________________________

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat