Nanette Elman, Appellant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 15, 1999
01976843 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 15, 1999)

01976843

06-15-1999

Nanette Elman, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Nanette Elman v. United States Postal Service

01976843

June 15, 1999

Nanette Elman, )

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01976843

) Agency No. 4-A-117-0059-97

)

William J. Henderson, )

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

______________________________)

DECISION

INTRODUCTION

Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final decision of

the agency concerning her complaint of unlawful employment discrimination

in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42

U.S.C. �2000e, et seq., and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973,

as amended, 29 U.S.C. �791 et seq. The final agency decision was received

by appellant on August 19, 1997. The appeal was postmarked September

11, 1997. Accordingly, the appeal is timely (see 29 C.F.R. �1614.402(a)),

and is accepted in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed appellant's

complaint for failure to contact an EEO counselor within forty-five (45)

days of the alleged unlawful incident.

BACKGROUND

A review of the record reveals that appellant initiated counseling

on January 14, 1997. She filed a formal complaint on April 22, 1997,

alleging that she was discriminated against on the bases of religion

(Jewish), disability (carpal tunnel syndrome) and reprisal (for

prior EEO activity) in that she was denied overtime by her supervisor.

The agency dismissed this complaint on the grounds of untimeliness.

The agency found that appellant had waited more than forty-five (45)

days from the end of the period that she was denied overtime, i.e.,

October 27, 1995 to October 6, 1996. The agency also dismissed the

complaint on the grounds that the complaint alleged a claim that the

agency had already decided. The agency stated that appellant had

requested EEO counseling on August 29, 1995 for the denial of overtime

by her supervisor and that appellant reached a settlement of that issue

during the counseling period. This appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1), effective October 1, 1992,

requires that complaints of discrimination must be brought to the

attention of the Equal Employment Opportunity Counselor within forty-five

(45) days of the date of the matter alleged to be discriminatory or,

in the case of a personnel action, within 45 days of the effective date

of the action.

The Commission has adopted a "reasonable suspicion" standard (as opposed

to a "supportive facts" standard) to determine when the limitation

period is triggered. See Ball v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880247

(July 6, 1988). Thus, the limitation period is not triggered until a

complainant reasonably suspects discrimination, but before all the facts

that support a charge of discrimination have become apparent.

A fair reading of appellant's complaint is that she was subjected to

a continuous denial of overtime. The Counselor's report shows that

appellant specifically alleged a continuous and ongoing denial of overtime

since October 27, 1995. Appellant's formal complaint also referenced

that the date of discrimination was "ongoing since original EEO complaint

of 10/27/95-10/6/96." We find that by reading the Counselor's Report

in conjunction with the formal complaint, appellant alleged a denial of

overtime that continued into the 45 day period preceding her counselor

contact. Therefore, the agency erred by dismissing those denials of

overtime which occurred during the 45 day period preceding the counselor

contact on January 14, 1997. The agency properly dismissed that part

of appellant's complaint concerning the denial of overtime more than 45

days prior to January 14, 1997. Accordingly, appellant's complaint is

AFFIRMED, in part, and REVERSED, in part.

ORDER (E1092)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue to

appellant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify appellant

of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days

of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgement to appellant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of rights

must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.

The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. ��1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.10.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0993)

This decision affirms the agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action

in an appropriate United States District Court on both that portion of

your complaint which the Commission has affirmed AND that portion of the

complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative processing.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file

a civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the

date you filed your complaint with the agency, or your appeal with the

Commission, until such time as the agency issues its final decision

on your complaint. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE

DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the

Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

June 15, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations