Nancy S. Brown, Appellant,v.Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 30, 1999
01992407x (E.E.O.C. Sep. 30, 1999)

01992407x

09-30-1999

Nancy S. Brown, Appellant, v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary, Department of Transportation, Agency.


Nancy S. Brown, )

Appellant, )

) Appeal No. 01992407

v. ) Agency No. DOT 1-99-1006

)

Rodney E. Slater, )

Secretary, )

Department of Transportation, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

INTRODUCTION

Appellant filed an appeal with this Commission from a final agency

decision (FAD) concerning her complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of

1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The appeal is accepted in

accordance with EEOC Order No. 960.001, as amended.

ISSUE PRESENTED

The issue on appeal is whether the agency properly dismissed appellant's

complaint for failure to state a claim.

BACKGROUND

Appellant filed a formal complaint on October 23, 1998, alleging

discrimination on the basis of sex (female) when on June 17, 1998, she

was subjected to sexual harassment and a hostile work environment when

she observed a co-worker wearing a T-shirt with the word �Hooters�

written on it. Appellant further alleges that she requested that

supervisor-1 (co-worker's supervisor) send the co-worker home to change

his shirt. Supervisor-1 agreed to do so and appellant left for the day.

The following day, appellant called in sick because she was upset about

the incident and became further upset when she looked up information

on the �Hooters� restaurant chain. On June 22, 1998, supervisor-2

(appellant's supervisor) informed appellant that supervisor-1 did not

send the co-worker home nor did supervisor-1 even raise the issue of

the T-shirt with the co-worker.

In its FAD dated January 7, 1999, the agency dismissed the complaint

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a). The agency found that appellant

did not state a claim in which she suffered a present loss or harm with

respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there

is a remedy. This appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides for the dismissal of

a complaint or portion thereof which fails to state a claim within the

meaning of 29 C.F.R. �1614.103. An agency shall accept a complaint from

any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he

or she has been discriminated against by that agency because of race,

color, religion, sex, national origin, age, or disabling condition.

29 C.F.R. �1614.103; �1614.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case

precedent has long defined an �aggrieved employee� as one who suffers

a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege

of employment for which there is a remedy. Riden v. Department of the

Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970314 (October 2, 1998).

In appellant's complaint, she asserts that the incident cited constitutes

harassment. In order to constitute a violation of Title VII, the

conduct must be �so objectively offensive as to alter the conditions of

the victim's employment.� See Enforcement Guidance: Vicarious Employer

Liability for Unlawful Harassment by Supervisors, EEOC Notice No.915.002

(June 18, 1999) (citing Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.,

118 S. Ct. 998, 1002 (1998)). Upon review of the totality of appellant's

complaint, we find that the incident described therein is not sufficient

to rise to the level to state a claim of harassment. Therefore, we find

that the agency properly dismissed appellant's complaint for failure to

state a claim, pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the decision of the agency is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work. If you file a request to reconsider and also file a

civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the administrative

processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Sept. 30, 1999

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations