Names, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Nov 29, 1995

319 N.L.R.B. 752 (N.L.R.B. 1995)

752
319 NLRB No. 102
DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
1 The complaint indicates that on about November 17, 1994, Re-
spondent filed a petition for bankruptcy pursuant to Chapter 11 of
the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York, 94-B-45379. It is well established,
however, that the institution of bankruptcy proceedings does not de-
prive the Board of jurisdiction or authority to entertain and process
an unfair labor practice case to its final disposition. Board proceed-
ings fall within the exception to the automatic stay provisions for
proceedings by a governmental unit to enforce its police or regu-
latory powers. See Phoenix Co., 274 NLRB 995 (1985), and cases
cited therein.
Names, Inc. (a/k/a Peglin, Inc.) and Knitwear Inde-
pendent Union. Case 4–CA–23404
November 29, 1995
DECISION AND ORDER
BY CHAIRMAN GOULD AND MEMBERS BROWNING
AND COHEN
Upon a charge filed by Knitwear Independent
Union, the Union, on January 5, 1995, the General
Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board issued
a complaint on April 28, 1995, against Names, Inc.
(a/k/a Peglin, Inc.), the Respondent, alleging that it has
violated Section 8(a)(1) and (5) of the National Labor
Relations Act. Although properly served copies of the
charge and complaint, the Respondent failed to file an
answer.
On October 23, 1995, the General Counsel filed a
Motion for Summary Judgment with the Board. On
October 25, 1995, the Board issued an order transfer-
ring the proceeding to the Board and a Notice to Show
Cause why the motion should not be granted. The Re-
spondent filed no response. The allegations in the mo-
tion are therefore undisputed.
The National Labor Relations Board has delegated
its authority in this proceeding to a three-member
panel.
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment
Sections 102.20 and 102.21 of the Board’s Rules
and Regulations provide that the allegations in the
complaint shall be deemed admitted if an answer is not
filed within 14 days from service of the complaint, un-
less good cause is shown. In addition, the complaint
affirmatively notes that unless an answer is filed within
14 days of service, all the allegations in the complaint
will be considered admitted. Further, the undisputed al-
legations in the Motion for Summary Judgment dis-
close that the Region, by letter dated August 9, 1995,
notified the Respondent that unless an answer were re-
ceived by August 16, 1995, a Motion for Summary
Judgment would be filed. By Order dated August 18,
1995, the time for filing an answer was extended to
September 30, 1995. Nevertheless, the Respondent
failed to file an answer.
In the absence of good cause being shown for the
failure to file a timely answer, we grant the General
Counsel’s Motion for Summary Judgment.1
On the entire record, the Board makes the following
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. JURISDICTION
At all material times, the Respondent, a Delaware
corporation, has been engaged in the design, manufac-
ture, and sale of girls’, boys’, and infants’ clothing at
a facility located at 201 North Third Street, Allentown,
Pennsylvania. During the year preceding issuance of
the complaint, the Respondent, in conducting its busi-
ness operations, sold and shipped from the Allentown
facility goods valued in excess of $50,000 directly to
points outside the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. We
find that the Respondent is an employer engaged in
commerce within the meaning of Section 2(2), (6), and
(7) of the Act and that the Union is a labor organiza-
tion within the meaning of Section 2(5) of the Act.
II. ALLEGED UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES
The following employees of the Respondent con-
stitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective
bargaining within the meaning of Section 9(b) of the
Act:
All non-supervisory production, packing, shipping
and cutting workers employed by the Respondent,
excluding guards and supervisors as defined in the
Act.
Since at least 1993 and at all material times, the
Union has been the designated exclusive collective-
bargaining representative of the unit and has been rec-
ognized as the representative by the Respondent. This
recognition has been embodied in collective-bargaining
agreements, the most recent of which (the agreement)
is effective by its terms from November 6, 1994,
through November 7, 1997. At all material times since
at least 1993, based on Section 9(a) of the Act, the
Union has been the exclusive collective-bargaining
representative of the unit.
In November and December 1994, the Respondent
laid off and/or terminated unit employees and failed
and refused to pay unit employees vacation benefits as
provided in article VIII of the agreement. These sub-
jects relate to wages, hours, and other terms and condi-
tions of employment of the unit and are mandatory
subjects for the purposes of collective bargaining. The
Respondent engaged in this conduct without prior no-
tice to the Union and without affording the Union an
opportunity to bargain with the Respondent with re-
spect to this conduct.
About December 8, 1994, the Union, by letter, re-
quested that the Respondent bargain collectively about
the following subjects: the effects of the planned clo-
753NAMES, INC.
2 Inasmuch as the Respondent’s facility appears to be closed, we
shall not include the usual reinstatement remedy for the Respond-
ent’s 8(a)(5)-layoff violation. See Stamping Specialty Co., 294
NLRB 703, 705 fn. 10 (1989).
sure of the Allentown plant, the layoff/termination of
employees, the selection of employees for lay-
off/termination, the failure to remit to the Union dues
deducted from employees’ paychecks, the failure to
pay employees’ vacation benefits, and the suspension
of employees’ medical benefits. Since about December
8, 1994, the Respondent has failed and refused to bar-
gain collectively about these subjects. These subjects
relate to the wages, hours, and other terms and condi-
tions of employment of the unit and are mandatory
subjects for the purposes of collective bargaining.
CONCLUSION OF LAW
By the acts and conduct described above, the Re-
spondent has been failing and refusing to bargain col-
lectively and in good faith with the exclusive collec-
tive-bargaining representative of its employees within
the meaning of Section 8(d) of the Act and has thereby
engaged in unfair labor practices affecting commerce
within the meaning of Section 8(a)(5) and (1) and Sec-
tion 2(6) and (7) of the Act.
REMEDY
Having found that the Respondent has engaged in
certain unfair labor practices, we shall order it to cease
and desist and to take certain affirmative action de-
signed to effectuate the policies of the Act. Specifi-
cally, having found that the Respondent violated Sec-
tion 8(a)(5) and (1) by laying off and/or terminating
unit employees in November and December 1994
without giving the Union notice or an opportunity to
bargain over the decision and its effects, we shall order
the Respondent to make the laid-off and/or terminated
employees whole for any resulting loss of earnings
from the date of their layoff and/or termination until
the date the facility closed. Backpay shall be computed
in accordance with F. W. Woolworth Co., 90 NLRB
289 (1950), with interest as prescribed in New Hori-
zons for the Retarded, 283 NLRB 1173 (1987).2
In addition, having found that the Respondent vio-
lated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing, in November
and December 1994, to pay unit employees contrac-
tually required vacation benefits as provided in article
VIII of the agreement, we shall order the Respondent
to make the unit employees whole by paying them
their accrued vacation benefits as required by the
agreement, with interest as prescribed in New Horizons
for the Retarded, supra.
Further, having found that the Respondent violated
Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing, since about Decem-
ber 8, 1994, to bargain with the Union over its failure
to remit deducted dues to the Union and its suspension
of employee medical benefits, we shall order the Re-
spondent to remit any and all withheld dues to the
Union as required by the agreement, with interest as
prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra,
and to make whole the unit employees by reimbursing
them for any expenses ensuing from its suspension of
medical benefits prior to the closure of the facility, as
set forth in Kraft Plumbing & Heating, 252 NLRB 891
fn. 2 (1980), enfd. mem. 661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981),
such amounts to be computed in the manner set forth
in Ogle Protection Service, 183 NLRB 682 (1970),
enfd. 444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971), with interest as
prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded, supra.
In addition, having found that the Respondent vio-
lated Section 8(a)(5) and (1) by failing and refusing to
bargain with the Union over the effects of the planned
closure of the facility, we shall order the Respondent
to bargain with the Union on request. In order to en-
sure meaningful bargaining, and in order to effectuate
the purposes of the Act, we shall accompany the bar-
gaining order with a limited backpay requirement de-
signed both to make whole the employees for losses
suffered as a result of the violations and to re-create
in some practicable manner a situation in which the
parties’ bargaining position is not entirely devoid of
economic consequences for the Respondent. We shall
do so by ordering the Respondent to pay backpay to
the terminated employees in a manner similar to that
required in Transmarine Navigation Corp., 170 NLRB
389 (1968).
Thus, the Respondent shall pay its terminated em-
ployees backpay at the rate of their normal wages
when last in the Respondent’s employ from 5 days
after the date of this Decision and Order until occur-
rence of the earliest of the following conditions: (1)
the date the Respondent bargains to agreement with
the Union on those subjects pertaining to the effects of
the closing of its facility on its employees; (2) a bona
fide impasse in bargaining; (3) the Union’s failure to
request bargaining within 5 days of the date of this
Decision and Order, or to commence negotiations
within 5 days of the Respondent’s notice of its desire
to bargain with the Union; (4) the Union’s subsequent
failure to bargain in good faith; but in no event shall
the sum paid to these employees exceed the amount
they would have earned as wages from the date on
which the Respondent terminated its operations, to the
time they secured equivalent employment elsewhere, or
the date on which the Respondent shall have offered
to bargain in good faith, whichever occurs sooner; pro-
vided, however, that in no event shall this sum be less
than the employees would have earned for a 2-week
period at the rate of their normal wages when last in
the Respondent’s employ. Backpay shall be based on
earnings which the terminated employees would nor-
mally have received during the applicable period, less
754 DECISIONS OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
3 If this Order is enforced by a judgment of a United States court
of appeals, the words in the notice reading ‘‘Posted by Order of the
National Labor Relations Board’’ shall read ‘‘Posted Pursuant to a
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals Enforcing an Order
of the National Labor Relations Board.’’
any net interim earnings, and shall be computed in ac-
cordance with F. W. Woolworth Co., supra, with inter-
est as prescribed in New Horizons for the Retarded,
supra.
Finally, in view of the fact that the Respondent’s fa-
cility appears to be closed, we shall order the Re-
spondent to mail a copy of the attached notice to the
Union and to the last known addresses of its former
employees in order to inform them of the outcome of
this proceeding.
ORDER
The National Labor Relations Board orders that the
Respondent, Names, Inc. (a/k/a Peglin, Inc.), Allen-
town, Pennsylvania, its officers, agents, successors, and
assigns, shall
1. Cease and desist from
(a) Laying off and/or terminating unit employees
and failing and refusing to pay unit employees vaca-
tion benefits as provided in article VIII of the agree-
ment, without providing Knitwear Independent Union
notice or an opportunity to bargain. The unit includes
the following employees:
All non-supervisory production, packing, shipping
and cutting workers employed by the Respondent,
excluding guards and supervisors as defined in the
Act.
(b) Failing or refusing to bargain with the Union
about the effects of the planned closure of its Allen-
town plant, the layoff/termination of employees, the
selection of employees for layoff/termination, the fail-
ure to remit to the Union dues deducted from em-
ployee paychecks, the failure to pay employee vacation
benefits, and the suspension of employee medical ben-
efits.
(c) In any like or related manner interfering with, re-
straining, or coercing employees in the exercise of the
rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
2. Take the following affirmative action necessary to
effectuate the policies of the Act.
(a) Make whole the unit employees who were unilat-
erally laid off and/or terminated in November and De-
cember 1994 for any loss of earnings resulting from
their layoff and/or termination prior to the closure of
the facility, with interest, in the manner set forth in the
remedy section of this decision.
(b) Make the unit employees whole for its failure to
pay them their accrued vacation benefits as provided in
article VIII of the agreement, with interest, in the man-
ner set forth in the remedy section of this decision.
(c) Remit to the Union any and all dues that were
deducted from the pay of unit employees pursuant to
valid dues-checkoff authorizations but that have not
been remitted, with interest, as set forth in the remedy
section of this decision.
(d) Make whole the unit employees for any expenses
incurred as a result of its unilateral suspension of em-
ployee medical benefits prior to the closure of the fa-
cility, with interest, as set forth in the remedy section
of this decision.
(e) On request, bargain with the Union over the ef-
fects on unit employees of the closure of the facility,
reduce to writing any agreement reached as a result of
such bargaining, and pay limited backpay to the unit
employees, in the manner set forth in the remedy sec-
tion of this decision.
(f) Preserve and, on request, make available to the
Board or its agents for examination and copying, all
payroll records, social security payment records, time-
cards, personnel records and reports, and all other
records necessary to analyze the amount of backpay
due under the terms of this Order.
(g) Mail signed and dated copies of the attached no-
tice, marked ‘‘Appendix,’’3 to the Union and all unit
employees. Copies of the notice, on forms provided by
the Regional Director for Region 4, after being signed
by the Respondent’s authorized representative, shall be
mailed immediately upon receipt by the Respondent to
the last known address of each employee.
(h) Notify the Regional Director in writing within
20 days from the date of this Order what steps the Re-
spondent has taken to comply.
APPENDIX
NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES
POSTED BY ORDER OF THE
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
An Agency of the United States Government
The National Labor Relations Board has found that we
violated the National Labor Relations Act and has or-
dered us to post and abide by this notice.
WE WILL NOT lay off and/or terminate unit employ-
ees or fail or refuse to pay unit employees vacation
benefits as provided in article VIII of the agreement,
without providing Knitwear Independent Union notice
or an opportunity to bargain. The unit includes the fol-
lowing employees:
All non-supervisory production, packing, shipping
and cutting workers employed by us, excluding
guards and supervisors as defined in the Act.
WE WILL NOT fail or refuse to bargain with the
Union about the effects of the planned closure of our
Allentown plant, the layoff/termination of employees,
755NAMES, INC.
the selection of employees for layoff/termination, the
failure to remit to the Union dues deducted from em-
ployee paychecks, the failure to pay employee vacation
benefits, and the suspension of employee medical ben-
efits.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce employees in the exercise of
the rights guaranteed them by Section 7 of the Act.
WE WILL make whole the unit employees who we
unilaterally laid off and/or terminated in November
and December 1994 for any loss of earnings resulting
from their layoff and/or termination prior to the closure
of the facility, with interest.
WE WILL make the unit employees whole for our
failure in November and December 1994 to pay them
their accrued vacation benefits as provided in article
VIII of the agreement, with interest.
WE WILL remit to the Union any and all dues that
were deducted from the pay of unit employees pursu-
ant to valid dues-checkoff authorizations but that have
not been remitted, with interest.
WE WILL make whole the unit employees for any
expenses incurred as a result of our unilateral suspen-
sion of employee medical benefits prior to the closure
of the facility, with interest.
WE WILL, on request, bargain with the Union over
the effects on unit employees of the closure of the fa-
cility, reduce to writing any agreement reached as a re-
sult of such bargaining, and pay limited backpay to the
unit employees in the manner set forth in the decision
of the National Labor Relations Board.
NAMES, INC. (A/K/A PEGLIN, INC.)