0520150475
01-08-2016
Myrna S. ,1 Complainant, v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (U.S. Coast Guard), Agency.
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013
Myrna S.
,1
Complainant,
v.
Jeh Johnson,
Secretary,
Department of Homeland Security
(U.S. Coast Guard),
Agency.
Request No. 0520150475
Appeal No. 0120130319
Agency No. HSUSCG212322012
DECISION ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120130319 (July 15, 2015). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c).
At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was employed as a Family Resource Specialist, GS-0101-11, in the Health and Safety Work-Life Center, located at Base Alameda in Alameda, California. Complainant filed an EEO complaint alleging that the Agency subjected her to a hostile work environment on the bases of race (African American), disability, age, and reprisal when: (1) on June 28, 2011, management offered an unsolicited diagnosis of her medical condition; (2) from June 29 through August 4, 2011, management disregarded her request for a copy of the Health, Safety, and Work-Life Enterprise Policy; (3) from August 4, 2011 through the present, she was denied a personal Agency computer and the computer support needed to work from home or from an alternative worksite; (4) from August 4, 2011, through present, she was denied the opportunity to telework as a reasonable accommodation; 5) from August 4, 2011, through present, management failed to safeguard her personal medical information; (6) on August 31, 2011, management ignored her request to allow the newly hired Work-Life Generalist or the Program Analyst to assist her with increased work demands that were assigned by management; (7) on September 4, 2011, her request for reasonable accommodation was denied; (8) from September 14, 2011, through November 14, 2011, and (9) on approximately December 1, 2011, management indicated that her medical condition was not a disability.
Our prior appellate decision affirmed the Agency's final decision, based on the evidence gathered during the investigation, that concluded that Complainant failed to prove her discrimination claims.
In her request for reconsideration, Complainant expresses her disagreement with the previous decision and reiterates arguments he has previously made. We emphasize that a request for reconsideration is not a second appeal to the Commission. See EEO MD-110, Ch. 9, � VII.A. Rather, a reconsideration request is an opportunity to demonstrate that the appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law, or will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or operations of the Agency. Complainant has not done so here.
After reviewing the previous decision and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(c), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 0120130319 remains the Commission's decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0610)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission. The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant's Right to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden's signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
January 8, 2016
__________________
Date
1 This case has been randomly assigned a pseudonym which will replace Complainant's name when the decision is published to non-parties and the Commission's website.
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
---------------
------------------------------------------------------------
2
0520150475
2
0520150475