05A30499
03-18-2003
Myrna G. Perez v. United States Postal Service
05A30499
March 18, 2003
.
Myrna G. Perez,
Complainant,
v.
John E. Potter,
Postmaster General,
United States Postal Service,
Agency.
Request No. 05A30499
Appeal No. 01A14624
Agency Nos. 4G-780-0214-98, 4G-780-0367-98, 4G-780-0076-99, 4G-780-0189-99
Hearing No. 360-A0-8174X
DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION
Myrna G. Perez (complainant) timely initiated a request to the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the
decision in Myrna G. Perez v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal
No. 01A14624 (November 25, 2002). EEOC Regulations provide that the
Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission
decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate
decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on
the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �
1614.405(b).
After a review of complainant's request for reconsideration, the
previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that
the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b),
and it is the decision of the Commission to deny the request. We note
that, in her request for reconsideration, complainant asserts that the
previous decision failed to provide her with a complete and accurate
statement of the law applicable to the case, and failed to provide its own
explanation, rather than that of the Administrative Judge (AJ), as to why
complainant failed to prove her discrimination claims. Complaint argues
that, as a result, she was �effectively deprived [] of a meaningful
right to convincingly challenge [the Commission's] decision through
reconsideration.� The previous decision, however, discussed the AJ's
factual findings supporting each claim of discrimination, and found that
the AJ's decision properly summarized the relevant facts and referenced
the appropriate regulations, policies, and laws pertaining to her claims.
Accordingly, we are not persuaded by complainant's argument on this
point. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A14624 remains the Commission's
final decision. There is no further right of administrative appeal on
the decision of the Commission on this request for reconsideration.
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)
This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right
of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the
right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District
Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this
decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in
the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department
head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
�Agency� or �department� means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
(�Right to File A Civil Action�).
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
March 18, 2003
Date