Murray Shoe Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJan 11, 193910 N.L.R.B. 1085 (N.L.R.B. 1939) Copy Citation In the Matter of MURRAY SHOE CO., INC. and UNITED SHOE WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE COMMITTEE FOR INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION Case No. C-1093.-Decided January 11, 1939 Shoe Manufacturing Industry-Settlement : agreement to comply with the provisions of the Act-Order: entered on stipulation. Mr. Bernard J. Donoghue, for the Board. Mr. Murray Rosenthal, of Boston, Mass., for the respondent. Mr. Nick Iodice, of Boston, Mass., for the United. Miss Edith Gorman and Miss Vina DePetris, of Melrose, Mass., for the Associates. Mr. Langdon West, of counsel to the Board.' DECISION AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE Upon charges and amended charges duly filed by United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Or- ganization, herein called the United, the National Labor Relations Board , herein called the' Board, by the Regional Director for the First Region (Boston, Massachusetts), issued its complaint dated December 7, 1938, against Murray Shoe Co., Inc., Melrose, 'Massa- chusetts, herein called the respondent, alleging that the respondent had engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 8 (1), (2), and (3) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. A copy of the complaint and notice of hearing thereon were duly served upon the respondent, the Murray Associates, and the United. The respondent did not file an answer to the complaint. Concerning the unfair labor practices the complaint alleged, in substance, that the respondent dominated and interfered with the formation and administration of a labor organization among its employees, known as Murray Associates, herein called the Associates, and that the respondent contributed financial and other support to the 10 N. L . R. B., No. 96. 1085 1086 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Associates ; that the respondent terminated the employment of and refused to reinstate one named employee because she was a member of and engaged in activities in behalf of the United, and also because she engaged in concerted activities with other employees of the respondent for the purpose of collective bargaining and other mutual- aid and protection; and that the respondent, by the aforesaid activi- ties and by threats, coercion, and intimidation, interfered with, re- strained, and coerced its employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act. On December 9, 1938, the respondent, the United, the Associates, and counsel for the Board entered into a stipulation in -settlement of the case. This stipulation provides as follows : Upon charges duly filed by United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization, with offices at 115 Blackstone Street, Boston, Massachusetts, by Nick Iodice, business agent and accredited representative for this pur- pose, A. Howard Myers, Regional Director for the National Labor Relations Board (hereinafter called the Board), acting pursuant to authority granted in Section 10 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, approved July 5, 1935, (hereinafter called the Act) and acting pursuant to its Rules and Regulations, Series 1, as amended, issued its Complaint and Notice of Hearing on December 7, 1938 against Murray Shoe Co., Inc. (hereinafter called the Respondent), Melrose, Massachusetts. The Charge as Amended, Complaint, Notice of Hearing, and a copy of the Rules and Regulations of the Board, Series 1, as amended April 27, 1936, were duly served upon the Respondent, Murray Associates, and upon the United Shoe Workers of Amer- ica, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization (hereinafter called the Union), on December 8, 1938, in accord- ance with said Rules and Regulations, which hearing was scheduled to begin at 9: 30 A. M. on December 15, 1938, in Court- room No. 5, Federal Building, Boston, Massachusetts. It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the Re- spondent, the Union, Murray Associates and Bernard J. Don- oghue, Attorney for the Board, as follows : 1. The Respondent is and has been since February 1, 1938, a corporation organized under and existing by virtue of the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, having its principal office and place of business in the City of Melrose, Middlesex County, Commonwealth of Massachusetts (hereinafter called the Melrose Plant), in dealing in leather and footwear and the manu- facture and sale of shoes, sandals and other products. DECISIONS AND ORDERS 1087 2. The Respondent, in the course and conduct of its business and in the operation of its Melrose Plant, causes and has con- tinuously caused large quantities of upper leather, sole leather, rubber, cloth, shoe lining, shanks, counters, heels, tacks, thread, eyelets, fabricated metals, glue and miscellaneous other materials and products used by it in the manufacture of its finished product to be purchased and transported in interstate commerce from and through states of the United States other than the Common- wealth of Massachusetts, including South Carolina, New York, Pennsylvania and Connecticut, to the Melrose Plant in the Coin- monwealth of Massachusetts, and causes and has continuously caused large quantities of its finished products, including leather, footwear, shoes, sandals and miscellaneous items manufactured and produced by Respondent to be sold, transported and dis- tributed in interstate commerce from the Melrose Plant in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, to, into and through states of the United States other than the Commonwealth of Massachu- setts, including New York, Pennsylvania, Maryland, North Caro- lina, South Carolina, Virginia, California, Missouri, and Illinois. 3. Since February 1, 1938 to date, the net sales of the Respond- ent amounted to approximately one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000). During this period approximately 50% of the raw materials used at the Melrose Plant of Respondent was received from states of the United States other than the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and approximately 75% of the products manu- factured by the Respondent at its Melrose Plant were shipped out of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to states of the United States other than the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Respondent admits it is engaged in interstate commerce and agrees not to contest the jurisdiction of the Board in this proceeding. 4. The United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization is a labor organization as defined in Section 2, subsection (5) of the Act. 5. The Respondent and its officers, agents and assigns shall: (a) Cease and desist from discouraging membership in the United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization, by discriminating against its em- ployees in regard to hire or tenure of employment or terms or conditions of employment; (b) Cease and desist from in any manner interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of their right to organize, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bar- 1088 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD gain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for the purpose of collec- tive bargaining for their mutual aid or protection, as guaranteed in Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act; (c) Withdraw all recognition immediately from Murray As- sociates as a representative of any of its employees for the pur- poses of dealing with Respondent concerning grievances, labor disputes, rates of pay, wages, hours of employment or other con- ditions of employment and completely disestablish Murray Asso- ciates as such representative; (d) Offer to Anita Lago immediate and full reinstatement to her former position without prejudice to her seniority or other rights and privileges and pay immediately and directly to Anita Lago as back pay the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars ($120.00) ; (e) Post immediately, and keep posted for a period of at least thirty (30) consecutive days from the date of posting, notices to its employees, in conspicuous places at its Melrose Plant, stat- ing that the Respondent shall cease and desist in the manner set forth in Paragraph 5, (a), (b), and (c) hereof; (f) Notify the Regional Director for the First Region in writing within forty, (40) days from this date, of its compliance with the terms of this stipulation ; 6. The Respondent, the Union and Murray Associates waive all rights to a hearing, as set forth in Section 10 (b) and Section 10 (c) of the Act. 7. This stipulation together with the Charge as Amended, the Complaint, Notice of Hearing, and Rules and Regulations of the Board, and Proof of Service thereof upon the parties may be introduced as evidence by filing them with the Chief Trial Examiner of the Board at Washington, D. C. 8. Upon this Stipulation, if approved by the National Labor Relations Board, an Order may forthwith be entered by the Na- tional Labor Relations Board and by the appropriate Circuit Court of Appeals, waiving further notice of the application therefor, incorporating the terms of Paragraph 5, sub-para- graphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (f) hereof. On December 13, 1938, the charge, as amended, the complaint with notice of hearing, National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regu- lations-Series 1, as amended, and the stipulation were filed with the Chief Trial Examiner of the Board at Washington, D. C., and thereby became part of the record in the case. On December 19, 1938, the Board issued its Order approving the above stipulation, making it part of the record, and transferring DECISIONS AND ORDERS 1089 the proceeding to the Board for the purpose of entry of a decision and order by the Board. Upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE RESPONDENT The respondent, a Massachusetts corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of leather shoes, sandals, and other leather products, with its principal office and place of business at Melrose, Massachusetts. In the manufacture of its finished products the re- spondent uses the following materials : Upper leather, sole leather, rubber, cloth, sole lining, shanks, counters, heels, tacks, thread, eye- lets, fabricated metals, and glue. In the course of its business the respondent has received at its Melrose plant large quantities of the afore-mentioned materials from States of the United States other than the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. During the period from February 1, 1938, to December 9, 1938, approximately 50 per cent of the raw materials used by the respondent at the Melrose plant were received from States of the United States other than the Common- wealth of Massachusetts. During the same period the net sales of the respondent amounted to approximately $100,000. During this same period approximately 75 per cent of the products manufactured by the respondent at its Melrose plant were shipped to points outside the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. We find that the above-described operations constitute a continuous flow of trade, traffic, and commerce among the several States. ORDER Upon the basis of the above findings of fact, stipulation, and the entire record in the case, and pursuant to Section 10 (c) of the Na- tional Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Board hereby orders that Murray Shoe Co., Inc., Melrose, Massachusetts, and its officers, agents, and assigns shall : 1. Cease and desist from : (a) Discouraging membership in the United Shoe Workers of America, affiliated with the Committee for Industrial Organization, by discriminating against its employees in regard to hire or tenure of employment or terms or conditions of employment; (b) In any manner interfering with, restraining, or coercing its employees in the exercise of their right to organize, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representa- tives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted activities for 1090 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD the purpose of collective bargaining for their mutual aid or protec- tion, as guaranteed in Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. Take the following affirmative action, which the Board finds will effectuate the policies of the Act : (a) Withdraw all recognition immediately from Murray Associates as a representative of any of its employees for the purposes of dealing with the respondent concerning grievances, labor disputes, rates of pay, wages, hours of employment or other conditions of employment and completely disestablish Murray Associates as such representative; (b) Offer to Anita Lago immediate and full reinstatement to her former position without prejudice to her seniority or other rights and privileges and pay immediately and directly to Anita Lago as back pay the sum of one hundred and twenty dollars ($120.00) ; (c) Post immediately, and keep posted for a period of at least thirty (30) consecutive days from the date of posting, notices to its em- ployees, in conspicuous places at its Melrose Plant, stating that the respondent shall cease and desist in the manner set forth in para- graphs (a), (b), and (c) of part 1 hereof; (d) Notify the Regional Director for the First Region in writing within forty (40) days from the date of the stipulation (December 9, 1938) of its compliance with the terms of the aforesaid stipulation. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation