Monica S. Ware, Petitioner,v.Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionMay 22, 2002
03A20033 (E.E.O.C. May. 22, 2002)

03A20033

05-22-2002

Monica S. Ware, Petitioner, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Monica S. Ware v. Department of Veterans Affairs

03A20033

May 22, 2002

.

Monica S. Ware,

Petitioner,

v.

Anthony J. Principi,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Petition No. 03A20033

MSPB No. AT-0572-99-0402, et.al.

DENIAL OF CONSIDERATION

On April 12, 2001, petitioner filed a petition with the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission asking for review of a Final Order issued by the

Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB or Board) concerning her claim

of discrimination in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq.

Initially, we dismissed that petition because the matter was still

pending before the MSPB. See Ware v. Department of Veteran Affairs,

EEOC Petition No. 03A10070 (May 24, 2002). After the conclusion of

proceedings before the MSPB, petitioner filed this petition with this

Commission on January 29, 2002.

Petitioner, a Pharmacy Technician at an agency's Medical Center in

Birmingham, Alabama, facility, alleged that she was discriminated against

on the basis of disability (rheumatoid arthritis) when she was terminated

from her position on March 13, 1999. The MSPB reversed the agency's

action, finding that petitioner had been discriminated against based

on her disability. The MSPB further ordered the agency pay petitioner

$31,040 in compensatory damages. Petitioner petitioned the MSPB for

review of that compensatory damages decision, and on December 18, 2001,

the Board denied petitioner's petition, finding no error in the previous

decision.

EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission has jurisdiction over

mixed case appeals on which the MSPB has issued a decision that makes

determinations on allegations of discrimination. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.303

et seq. The Commission must determine whether the decision of the

MSPB with respect to the allegation of discrimination constitutes an

incorrect interpretation of any applicable law, rule, regulation or policy

directive, or is not supported by the evidence in the record as a whole.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.305(c).

In the Board's December 18,2001, denial, clear appeal rights were provided

to the petitioner to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal

Circuit. Those appeal rights did not include instructions to appeal to

this Commission. Petitioner has appealed to the Commission in error.

Although the statements petitioner submitted to the Commission are not

clear, it appears that she is alleging violations of criminal statutes

by the agency and non-compliance by the agency with the Board's previous

order. In either instance, this Commission is not the appropriate forum

to address those issues. Petitions for enforcement of MSPB decisions

should be directed to the MSPB. Allegations of criminal wrongdoing should

be brought to the attention of state or federal authorities charged with

the duty of enforcing the statutes in question. Thus, petitioner has

not presented us with a decision from the MSPB with which we could concur

or differ. Therefore, the Commission denies the petition for review.

PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (W0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court,

based on the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board, within

thirty (30) calendar days of the date that you receive this decision.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

May 22, 2002

__________________

Date