Mobley Packing Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 7, 195088 N.L.R.B. 517 (N.L.R.B. 1950) Copy Citation .In the Matter of TOM MOBLEY AND H. R. MOBLEY, D/B/A MOBLEY PACKING COMPANY, EMPLOYER and AMALGAMATED MEAT CUTTERS AND BUTCHER WORKMEN OF NORTH AMERICA, AFL, PETITIONER Case No. 33-RC-144.-Decided February 7, 1950 DECISION AND ORDER Upon a petition duly filed, a hearing was held before Charles Y. Latimer, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed., Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel [Chairman Herzog and Members Houston and Murdock]. Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds: The Employer, a partnership, owns and operates a meat processing plant at Albuquerque, New Mexico. 1111948, the Employer purchased cattle, hogs, poultry, and sheep valued at $505,000, all of which were purchased within the State of New Mexico. Purchases of other sup- plies from outside the State during this period, including spices, sea- soning, and casings valued at $9,500 were approximately 13/% percent -of the total amount of supplies purchased. During the same year, the Employer's sales totaled $592,000, all of which were within the State ,of New Mexico. Hides valued at $22,000 were sold to a hide dealer within the State. They were ultimately shipped by the dealer to points outside the State. During the first 11 months of 1949, the Employer purchased cattle, hogs, poultry, and sheep valued at $340,000, all of which, except for -one load of cattle valued at $3,500, were purchased within the State. Purchases of other supplies from outside the State during this period, including spices, seasoning, and casings were valued at approximately $6,000. Total purchases made outside the State during the first 11 months of 1949 were approximately 3 percent of all purchases. Dur- oThe petition and other papers were amended at the hearing to show the correct name -of the Employer. 88 NLRB No. 114. 517 518 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ing the same year, the Employer's sales totaled $410,000, all of which,, except for one carload of grease valued at $1,500, were within the State. Hides valued at $18,000 were sold in the same manner as in 1948. The record discloses that there is no Federal meat inspector at the Employer's plant. The Employer asserts that it is not engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. While we do not find that the operations of the Employer are unrelated to commerce, we find the Employer's activities are local in character, and- that it would not effectuate the policies of the Act to assert jurisdiction in this case.2 Accordingly, we shall dismiss the petition .3 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition herein be, and it hereby is, dismissed. 2 Herold & Sons, Inc., 82 NLRB 174. 8 As we are dismissing the petition for reasons stated above , we find It Is unnecessary to consider other issues raised by the parties. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation