Minneapolis Brewing Co.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jun 30, 1942

41 N.L.R.B. 1513 (N.L.R.B. 1942)

In the Matter Of MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY and BREWERY MALT
HOUSE AND SOFT DRINK WORKERS LOCAL UNION #205 OF THE INTER-
NATIONAL UNION OF UNITED BREWERY, FLOUR, CEREAL AND SOFT
DRINK WORKERS OF AMERICA
Case No. C-2223.-Decided June 30, 1942
Jurisdiction : brewery industry.
Settlement : stipulation providing for compliance with the Act.
Remedial Orders : entered on stipulation.
Mr. Guy Farmer, for the Board.
Mr. Jo/vn C. Benson, Mr. Chester L. Nichols and Mr. Patrick L.
Farnand, of Minneapolis, Minn., for the respondent.
Mr. Martin F. O'Donoghue, of Washington, D. C., and Mr. John
McKasy, of Minneapolis, Minn., for the Union.
Messrs. Padway and Goldberg by Mr. I. E. Goldberg, of Milwaukee,
Wis., for the Teamsters.
Mr. Fred A. Dewey, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
ORDER
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a second amended charge duly filed by Brewery Malt House
and Soft Drink Workers Local Union #205 of the International
Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of
America, herein called the Union, the National Labor Relations Board,
herein called the Board, by the Regional Director for the Eighteenth
Region (Minneapolis, Minnesota), issued its complaint dated April
23, 1942, against Mineapolis Brewing Company, Minneapolis, Minne=
sota, herein called the respondent, alleging that the respondent had
engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting com-
merce within the meaning of Section 8 (1) and (3) and Section 2 (6)
and (7) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called
the Act. Copies of the complaint were duly served upon the Union
and the respondent. On May 9, 1942, Local Union No. 792, Interna-
tional Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and
Helpers of America, affiliated with the A. F. of L., herein called the
41 N L. R. B., No. 255.
1513
1514 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Teamsters , filed with the Regional Director a motion for intervention.
The case was scheduled for hearing on May 18, 1942 , before Samuel H.
Jaffee, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Exam-
iner. The Teamsters appeared at the hearing by counsel and urged
its motion for intervention which was granted by the Trial Examiner.
During the course of the hearing , upon motion of counsel for the
Board, certain amendments were made to the complaint and incorpo-
rated in a document entitled "Amended Complaint ." Thereafter,
during the course of the hearing on June 3, 1942, counsel for the Team-
sters withdrew in writing its appearance from this proceeding , stating
on the record that the Teamsters had knowledge of a proposed stipu-
lation which was to be entered into by counsel for the Board, the
Union, and the respondent , subject to the approval of the Board.
Concerning the unfair labor practices , the amended complaint
alleged in substance that the respondent : ( 1) laid off and discharged
a number of employees and failed and refused to reinstate them
because they joined and assisted the Union and engaged in concerted
activities with other employees for the purposes of collective bargain-
ing and because said employees • refused to change their affiliation
from the Union to the Teamsters ; ( 2) permitted the Teamsters to
engage in organizational activities among the respondent 's employees
on the respondent 's property during working hours and assisted the
Teamsters in its efforts to persuade and induce the respondent's em-
ployees to change their affiliation from the Union to the Teamsters,
advised, urged and warned the respondent 's employees to change their
affiliation from the Union to the Teamsters , refused to permit em-
ployees who were members of the Union to drive the respondent's
trucks, refused to comply with the terms of a collective bargaining
agreement between respondent and the Union, imposed as a condition
of employment of respondent 's employees membership in the Team-
sters and notified the Union that its collective bargaining agreement
with the respondent was terminated; and (3) by the acts set forth
above, interfered with, restrained , and coerced their employees in the
exercise of the rights guaranteed in Section 7 of the Act. On June 3,
1942, during the course of the scheduled hearing in the case, the
respondent , the Union , and counsel for the Board entered into a
stipulation in settlement of the case . The stipulation provides as
follows :
It being the mutual desire of all parties hereto amicably to
adjust any differences that may have arisen between them and
to conclude the proceedings before the National Labor Relations
Board in this matter.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Minneapolis
Brewing Company , herein called the Company ; Brewery Malt
House and Soft Drink Workers Local Union #205 of the Inter-
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY 1515
national Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink
Workers of America, herein called the Brewery Workers; and
Guy Farmer, Regional Attorney for the National Labor Rela-
tions Board, Eighteenth Region, as follows :
I
Upon a Second Amended Charge duly filed by the Brewery
Workers, the National Labor Relations Board, herein called the
Board, by the Regional Director for the Eighteenth Region,
issued its Complaint and Notice of Hearing thereon, dated April
23, 1942, against the Company, alleging that the Company had
engaged in and was engaging in unfair labor practices affecting
commerce within-the meaning of Section 8, subdivisions (1) and
(3), and Section 2, subdivisions (6) and (7) of the National Labor
Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, hereun'called the Act. Copies, of the
Complaint, Second Amended Charge, and Notice of Hearing
were duly served upon the Company and the Brewery Workers;
and a hearing upon the allegations set forth in said Complaint
was scheduled by the Notice of Hearing to begin on May 4, 1942,
at Minneapolis, Minnesota. On April 29, 1942, upon the motion
of counsel for the Company, the Board, by the said Regional
Director, issued its Order Extending Time for Filing Respond-
ent's Answer, Continuing the Hearing and Changing Place of
Hearing. On May 11, 1942, the Company filed its Answer to said
Complaint, denying the allegations of unfair labor practices. On
May 9, 1942, Local Union No. 792, International Brotherhood of
Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America,
affiliated with the A. F. of L., herein called the Teamsters, filed
with the said Regional Director its Motion for Intervention,
which motion the Regional Director, pursuant to Section 19,
Article I, of the National Labor Relations Board Rules
and Regulations-Series 2,-as amended, referred to the Trial
Examiner.
II
Pursuant to the Notice of Hearing and the Order Extending
Time for Filing Respondent's Answer, Continuing the Hearing
and Changing Place of Hearing, a hearing on the allegations
set forth in said Complaint commenced in Minneapolis, Minne-
sota, at 10 a. in. on the 18th day of May 1942, before Samuel H.
Jaffee, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial
Examiner. At the hearing, the Teamsters appeared by counsel
and urged its Motion for Intervention previously filed. The
Trial Examiner granted the Motion and permitted the Teamsters
to intervene in the proceeding. The Company, the Brewery
I
1516 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR -RELATIONS BOARD
Workers, and the Teamsters were represented by counsel and
participated in the hearing. During-the course of the hearing,
upon motion of the attorney for the Board, certain amendments
were made to the Complaint, said amendments being incorporated
in a document entitled "Amended Complaint" and expressly made
part of the record herein. During the course of the opening
day of the hearing and thereafter, the Trial Examiner adjourned
the hearing from time to time for the purpose of permitting the
parties to discuss an amicable settlement of this matter. There-
after, during the course of the hearing on June 3, 1942, counsel
for the Teamsters withdrew in writing its appearance from this
proceeding, stating on the record that he had knowledge of this
.stipulation and that the Teamsters had no objection thereto. In
view of this Stipulation, the parties mutually agree to join in
requesting the Trial Examiner to continue said hearing sine die,
pending approval by the Board of this Stipulation.
III
All parties hereto acknowledge due and timely service of the
Complaint, Notice of Hearing and Second Amended Charge and
of all other orders and pleadings in this case and expressly waive
further pleadings and further hearing after the filing of this Stip-
ulation as part of the record in this proceeding and the making
of findings of fact and conclusions of law by the Board, and to
any other or further proceedings, preliminary to the issuance of
an order herein under the National Labor Relations Act or the_
Rules and Regulations of the Board.
IV
The Company is and has been at all times material herein a
corporation organized under and existing by virtue of the laws
of the State of Minnesota, with its principal office and place of
business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. In the course and conduct
of its business, respondent owns and operates a brewery in Min-
neapolis, where it is now and at all times herein mentioned has
been engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of beer
and ale. During the calendar year of 1941, the Company pur-
chased materials, consisting principally of malt, hops, rice, corn
grits, sugar, labels, crowns, fuel, kegs, cartons, bottles, and cans,
valued at approximately $1,685,795,, of which approximately 52
per cent represents materials purchased in States other than the
State of Minnesota and transported in interstate commerce to its
place of business at Minneapolis, Minnesota. During the same
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY 1517
period, the Company sold beer and ale valued at approximately
$7,218,274, of which approximately 37 per cent represents products
sold and transported in interstate commerce from the Company's
place of business at Minneapolis, Minnesota, to purchasers located
outside of the State of Minnesota.
For the purposes of this proceeding, the Company admits that
it is engaged in interstate commerce within the meaning of the
National Labor Relations Act and that its operations affect com-
merce within the meaning of said Act.
V
The Brewery Workers is a labor organization within the mean-
ing of Section 2, subdivision (5) of the Act.
VI
The Second Amended Charge; the Complaint; the Amended
Complaint; the Notice of Hearing, including the acceptance of
service indicated thereon, the Motion filed by counsel for the
Company on April 28, 1942; the Order Extending Time for Fil-
ing Respondent's Answer, Continuing the Hearing and Chang-
ing Place of Hearing; the Affidavit as to Service of the Order
Extending Time for Filing Respondent's Answer, Continuing
the Hearing and Changing Place of Hearing; and the Return
Receipts attached thereto; the Motion for Intervention filed by
the Teamsters; Withdrawal of Intervention, and Disclaimer filed
by the Teamsters on June 3, 1942; the Answer of the Company;
the Order Designating Trial Examiner; and this stipulation may
be filed with the Chief Trial Examiner at Washington, D. C.,
and when so filed shall constitute the entire record in this' case.
VII
The entire agreement among the parties to this Stipulation is
contained within the terms hereof, and there is no agreement of
any kind among said parties which varies, alters, or adds to the
terms of this Stipulation.
VIII
IT IS YURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that, upon the record, as
defined herein, and without further notice or proceedings herein,
the Board may enter an order providing as follows :
1. The Minneapolis Brewing Company, its officers, agents,
successors, and assigns, shall not :
(a) Discourage, membership in Brewery Malt House and
Soft Drink Workers Local Union #205 of the International
1518 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink
Workers of America, or any other labor organization of its
employees, by discharging, laying off, or refusing to reinstate
any of its employees, or in any other manner discriminating
in regard to their hire, and tenure of employment or any term
or condition of employment;
(b) In any other manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce
its employees in the exercise of their rights to,self-organiza-
tion, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain
collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and
to engage in concerted activities for the purposes of collective
bargaining or other mutual' aid' or protection, as guaranteed
in Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act.
2. The Minneapolis Brewing Company, its officers, agents,
successors and assigns shall take the following affirmative action
to effectuate the policies of the National Labor Relations Act :
(a) Offer to the employees listed in Appendix A I hereof,
and each of them, immediate and full reinstatement to their
former positions without prejudice to their seniority or other
rights and privileges;
(b) Make whole the employees listed in Appendix A hereof,
and each of them, for any loss of pay they may have suffered
by reason of their discharge, lay-off, or refusal of reinstate-
ment, by payment to each of them of the sum of money, if any,
set forth opposite the name of each of them in Appendix A
hereof, deducting therefrom, however, his net earnings, if any,
from December 30, 1941, to June 5, 1942;
(c) Post immediately in conspicuous places throughout its
place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and maintain for
a period of at least sixty (60) consecutive days from the date
of posting notices identical with the form of the notice set
forth in Appendix B 2 hereof; and
(d) Notify the Regional Director for the Eighteenth Re-
gion in writing within ten (10) days from the date of this
order what steps the respondent has taken to comply therewith.
IX
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that, upon application by
the National Labor Relations Board, any appropriate United
State Circuit Court of Appeals shall enter a decree enforcing the
order of the Board hereinabove set forth, and' the parties hereto
consent to the entry of said decree and further waive any and all
1 Appendix A is hereinafter set forth as a part of the Order.
2 Appendix B is hereinafter set forth as a part of the Order.
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY 1519
requirements of notice of the application for or entry of said
decree, provided that a, copy of said decree shall be served upon
the Company and the Brewery Workers after its entry.
X
This Stipulation is subject to the approval of the National
Labor Relations Board and shall become effective -immediately/
upon notice to the parties of the granting of such approval.
On June 13, 1942, the Board issued an order approving the above
stipulation, making it a part of the record, and pursuant to Article
II, Section 36, of National Labor Relations Board Rules, and Regu-
lations-Series 2, as amended, transferring the proceeding to the
Board for the purpose of entering a Decision and Order pursuant to
the provisions of the stipulation.
On the basis of the above stipulation and upon the entire record in
the case, the Board makes the following : -
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE RESPONDENT
Minneapolis Brewing Company is a Minnesota corporation with its
principal office and place of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The
respondent owns and operates a brewery in Minneapolis, Minnesota,
where it manufacturers, sells, and distributes beer and ale. During
the calendar year 1941, the respondent purchased materials valued`at
approximately $1,685,795, of which approximately 52 percent repre-
sents materials purchased in States other than the State of Minne-
sota, and transported in interstate commerce to its place of business
at Minneapolis, Minnesota. During the same period the respondent
sold beer and ale valued at approximately $7,218,274, of which approxi-
mately 37 percent represents products sold and transported in inter-
state commerce from respondent's place of business at Minneapolis,
Minnesota, to purchasers located outside the State of Minnesota. The
respondent admits that it is engaged in commerce and that its opera-
tions affect commerce within the meaning of the Act.
We find that the above-described operations of the respondent con-
stitute a continuous flow of trade, -traffic, and commerce among the
several States.
ORDER
Upon the basis of the above findings of fact, the stipulation, and
the entire record in the case, and pursuant to Section 10 (c) of the
1520 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
National Labor Relations Act, the National Labor Relations Board
hereby orders that :
1. The Minneapolis Brewing Company, its officers, agents, succes-
sors, and assigns, shall not :
(a) Discourage membership in Brewery Malt House and Soft
Drink Workers Local Union #205 of the International Union of
United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America,
or any other labor organization of its employees, by discharging, lay-
ing off, or refusing to reinstate any of its employees, or in any other
manner discriminating in regard to their hire and tenure of employ-
ment or any term or condition of employment;
(b) In any other manner interfere with, restrain, or coerce its
employees in the exercise of their rights to self-organization, to form,
join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through
representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in concerted
activities for the purposes of collective bargaining or other mutual
aid or protection, as guaranteed in Section 7 of the National Labor
Relations Act.
2. The Minneapolis Brewing Company, its officers, agents, succes-
sors and assigns shall take the following affirmative action to effectuate
the policies of the National Labor Relations Act:
(a) Offer to the employees listed in Appendix A hereof, and each
of them, immediate and full reinstatement to their former positions
without prejudice to their seniority or other rights and privileges;
(b) Make whole the employees listed in Appendix A hereof, and
each of them, for any loss of pay they may have suffered by reason
of their discharge, lay-off, or refusal of reinstatement by payment
to, each of them of the sum of money, if any, set forth opposite the
name of each of them in Appendix A hereof, deducting therefrom,
however, his net earnings, if any, from December 30, 1941, to June 5,
1942;
(c) Post immediately in conspicuous places throughout its place
of business in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and maintain for a period of
at least sixty (60) consecutive days from the date of posting notices
identical with the form of the notice set forth in Appendix B hereof;
and
(d) Notify the Regional Director for the Eighteenth Region in
writing within ten (10) days from the date of, this order what steps
the respondent has taken to comply herewith.
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY
APPENDIX A
1521
Alan Arntson_______________ $558.00 Thomas Krezowski __________ $542. 00
Otto E. Boettcher___________ 542.00 Lawrence G. Kondrick, Jr.._ 588. 00
Edmund V. Burke__________ 832.20 Stanley Kozak______________ 558.00
Roland L. Bjork__ __________ 542.00 Steve Krepis_______________ 542.00
Joe M. Bodnarezyk---------- 702.00 Raymond F. Kudak--------- 654. 00
Ralph A. Bloch__ ----------- 542. 00 Joseph J. Langa, Sr--------- 441. 00
Joe Berzak_________________ 558.00 Nick P. LaPointe----------- 542.00
John M. Churilla___________ 670.00 John Longley_______________ 798.00
Robert E. Campbell--------- 674. 00 John Lomberger____________ 588. 00
Lawrence A. Coulombe______ 542.00 Michael Magurani__________ 542.00
Robert Carlson _____________ 542.00 Frank J. Midderigh_________ 542. 00
Virgil R. Carlson___________ 798.00 Joseph S. Martin____________ 542.00
Franklin B. Cog____________ 753.00 David Munn, Jr------------ 542.00
Harry A. Dryer_____________ 574.00 John Marren_______________ 798.00
Donald W. Daniels--------- 638.00 James W. Matchinsky_______ 525. 00
Robert J. Dehne____________ 798.00 Frank Meyers______________ 245.00
Michael J. Deminsky ________ 638. 00 Steve Mohn________________ 575.00
Howard Drum______________ 606.00 Bernard Motyle____________ 678.00
Frank S. Dietz______________ 798.00 Thomas H. McDonald------- 542. 00
Walter Dolny --------------- 98.00 Charles E. McMillan-------- 606.00
Bernard Dombek----------- 738 00 Donald R. MacGregor------- 306. 00
Clyde F. Evers_____________ 588.00 William McPherson--------- 174.00
John E . Folstad_____ _______ 558.00 John E. Nelson_____________ 542.00
Alfred H. Fritsche__________ 574. 00 Ernest C. Nagel____________ 542.00
George V. Festin____________ 670.00 Stanley H. Owczarzak______ 542.00
Harold M. Flannery -------- 798.00 Paul A. Olson______________ 622.00
Robert E. Gollnick__________ 542.00 Joe Owczarzak_____________ 553.00
George J. Glaser__________i 542.00 Paul Lee Olson_____________ 670.00
Hugo C. Goede_____________ 654.00 Harry Osterlund ____________ 159.00
Claren C. Gardner---------- 798.00 James Ouellette____________ 798. 00
Daniel Greeley_____________ 645.00 Albert Placek______________ 559.00
Lawrence E. Gorski_________ 638. 00 Roy W. Peterson____________ 590.00
John J. Grabowske__________ 670.00 John P. Quaid______________ 542 00
John Gacek________________ 798 00 Ludwig J. Rippe____________ 798. 00
Louis Galuska______________ 542.00 Malcolm J. Ryan___________ 574.00
John Grochowski___________ 558. 00 Tony Reha_________________ 670.00
Edward J. Hertzog_________ 542.00 Andrew V. Rapacz__________ 718 00
Ernest R. Hirth ------------ 542 00 Clarence Rachel____________ 618.00
Edward L. Hertzog_________ 542.00 Matthew J . Rausch_________ 590.00
Donald Hall________________ 91.00 Wesley A. Schultz__________ 542.00
Edwin Hoglund_____________ 702. 00 Joseph A: Stimmler_________ 590.00
Donald T Invie____________ 542.00 Domanic V. Stelmoszewski__ 614.00
John V. Johnson____________ 542.00 Harlow Schmidt____________ 681. 00
Zigfnund Julkowski_________ 590.00 John Szymanski____________ 798 00
Elmer W Johnson__________ 542.00 Fred Speakman_____________ 385.00
Matthew J. Kauth__________ 565.00 Joseph Stanek______________ 542.00
Earl A. Kirchgatter_________ 558.00 Orlando A. Thompson------- 542. 00
Mike J. Kostick____________ 542.00 Ralph Tegland_____________ 798. 00
Louis J. Klemish___________ 705.00 Richard G. Urbanski -------- 574 00
Richard V . Klick___________ 542.00 Mike J. Vawracz____________ 542:00
Russell E . Kent____________ 542.00 John H Varhol____________ 542.00
William T. Kowalik_________ 590. 00 Robert J. Wineman_________ 798.00
463892-42-vol. 41-96
1522 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Marvin A Wicklund________ $798.00 Fred Saxton_______________ $703 40
John Warhol_______________ 588.00 John E Thayer_____________ 610.40
Casimir Warpeha ----------- 542: 00 Martin L. Wallner, Jr------- 610.40
,Charles Winberg____________ 618.00 Ernest F. Weiss, Jr--------- 706.40
'Frank Wojciak_____________ 562.00 Fred G Wallner____________ 722.40
Harry Wood________________ .603. 00 Andrew L. Wasilak_________ 610.40
Chester C. Zimmerman------ 542. 00 Andrew Wasilak, Jr-------- 658.40
Joseph P . Zdon_____________ 670.00 Arthur Wiegele_____________ 626 40
Andrew N. Zeimes__________ 654. 00 Richard J. Zimmermann---- 626.40
George Butler______________ 428.40 Arthur F. Zapf_____________ 690.40
-Peter Guzzo________________ 518.40 Floyd Peterson_____________ 658.40
William Al. Asmus__________ 834.40 Rudy R Riedel_____________ 610.40
William.J. Arenz___________ 610. 40 Leo Casey__________________ 798.00
Fred Bloch_________________ 610 40 Harvey Freund____________ 229.60
John E. Berg_________ _____ 866.40 Frank Haack_______________ 382.40
Walter H Bloch____________ 724.40 George H. Hile_____________ 386.40
Henry C. Boughner__'_______ 610.40 Daniel Kennedy____________ 413.40
Raymond Bluml___! ________ 658.40 George F Kisel____________ 542.00
Nick Barthold______________ 850.40 Arthur Molander___________ 0
William Blake_____________ 610. 40 George P. Swenson--------- 0
Harry Barnes______________ 690.40 Walter Vosika______________ 498.40
Frank Caputa______________ 610.40 Wayne White_______________ 130.00
Edward C Caputa__________ 530.00 Arthur Austin______________ 487.20
Max Duerre________________ 610.40 Archie McDonald___________ 798. 00
William H. Ebbighausen____ 610.40 Herman Tews---------- ____ 866 40
Conrad F. Frank, Jr-------- 610.40 George Ginn_______________ 798.00
Irving Frank________________ 754.40 John T Hutchinson--------- 570 00
Stanley B. Galas____________ 722 40 Louis Bailey_______________ 866. 40
Michael Gromek____________ 690. 40 Glenn Swedock_____________ 798. 00
Joseph T Halek____________ 700.40 Vernon A Hamann_________ 820.80
Harvey K Kruse___________ 866.40 John Paul Perrin___________ 866.40
Paul J. Kurysh_____________ 626.40 Frederick J. Krans_________ 866.40
William Lunaeck ----------- 642 40 Michael J Milmes----------- 866.40
Robert F Lang_____________ 716 40 John Thorsten______________ 798.00
Carl G Lindahl____________ 706.40 Joseph A Lange, Jr --------- 606 00
John A Miazga_____________ 722.40 Max H. Schultz_____________ 698. 00
Anthony Mahlberg__________ 610.40 Albert C Schultz___________ 798.00
Everett J. Miller___________ 610.40 Stanley F. Mrugala_________ 798.00
Angus J McDonald--------- 633. 40 Thomas E Burke___________ 798.00
John A. Pantzke____________ 734.40 Otto F. Goettsche, Sr------- 866.40
Ward E. Potter_____________ 709. 40 Carl H. Richter____________ 798.00
August H Schulte__________ 783 40 Fritz IT Rohkohl___________ 866.40
Herman E. Schulz___________ 722. 40 Frank J. Lebra_____________ 866.40
John M. Sanison____________ 610.40 Frank Erickson _ 798 00
Donald J. Stimmler_________ 732. 40 Albert W. Schultz___________ 798.00
Anthony W Schlegel-------- 610.40 Joseph A Stommel__________ 798. 00
Edward W Schach__________ 866.40 Chester K. Hall____________ 798.00
Anton Sawatske____________ 610. 40 Emil Revhng_______________ 866.40
Gregory Sorofty ------------ 610 40 Virgil-,E Senescall__________ 1866 40
Thomas Sexton_____________ . 510.40 Edward S Larson__________ 798 00
Paul Sawatske______________ 610. 40 Richard Kolar______________ 798.00
Earl L. Stickney ------------ 610 40 James J Hudoba____________ 866. 40
Dave Swanson______________ 610.40 Harry Hastings_____________ 820.80`
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING COMPANY 1523
Charles P. Benolkin_________ $708 80 Emil E Loehner---- ------ -- $297.50
Walter Bona_______________ 350. 00 Joseph T. Michalec_________ 70.00
Raphael Belanger----------- 350. 00 Arthur W. Opat____________ 157. 50
Carl J. Dahietl_____________ 36.50 Leo Sochacki_______________ 350.00
Selmer Felland_____________ 292. 00 Elwood M. Lossen __________ 57.00
APPENDIX B
k
NOTICE
1. Minneapolis Brewing Company will not in any manner interfere
with, restrain, or coerce its employees in the exercise of their right
to join labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representa-
tii7es'of their own' choosing, or to engage in collective bargaining or
other concerted activities for the purposes of other • mutual aid or
protection.
. '2. Minneapolis Brewing Company will not discourage membership
in Brewery Malt House and Soft Drink Workers Local #205 of the
International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal aiid Soft Drink
Workers of America, or any other labor organization of its employees,
by discharging, laying off, or refusing to reinstate any of its employees,
or in any other manner discriminating with regard to their hire or
tenure of employment, or any other condition of employment, because
of their membership in or affiliation with Brewery Malt House and
Soft Drink Workers Local Union #205 of the International Union
of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America.
3. Minneapolis Brewing Company has offered to the employees
whose names are attached hereto immediate and full reinstatement to
their former positions without prejudice to their seniority or other
rights and privileges and has made whole said employees for any loss
of pay they may have suffered by payment to each of them of the sum
of money set forth opposite the name of each of them, less his net
earnings during his lay-off or period of unemployment.
4. The employees of Minneapolis Brewing Company are free to
become or remain members of Brewery Malt House and Soft Drink
Workers Local Union #205 of the International Union of United
Brewery, Flour, Cereal and Soft Drink Workers of America, or any
other labor organization, and Minneapolis Brewing Company will not
discriminate. against any employee because of membership or activity
in that organization or any other labor organization.
MINNEAPOLIS BREWING CODZPr1NY,
BY, -