Miloslav Muller, Complainant,v.Ed Schafer, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 6, 2009
0520090088 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 6, 2009)

0520090088

01-06-2009

Miloslav Muller, Complainant, v. Ed Schafer, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Miloslav Muller,

Complainant,

v.

Ed Schafer,

Secretary,

Department of Agriculture,

Agency.

Request No. 0520090088

Appeal No. 0120083137

Agency No. APHIS200700044

DENIAL

Complainant timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Miloslav

Muller v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 0120083137 (September

24, 2008). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may, in its

discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission decision

where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision

involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or

(2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging discrimination in reprisal

for prior EEO activity when on October 12, 2006, he learned that he was

not selected for the position of supervisory VMO, Area Veterinarian in

Charge, GSD-701-13/14, Vacancy Announcement 6VS-2006-0183, Albuquerque,

New Mexico.1

After an investigation, complainant requested a hearing before an

EEOC Administrative Judge. The AJ assigned to the case determined

that there were no material issues in dispute, and that a decision

finding no discrimination was appropriate. Specifically, the AJ found

complainant was not the highest ranked applicant, and the selectee had

strong management skills. The AJ found complainant failed to present

sufficient evidence that would suggest the agency's reasons for its

actions are a pretext for discrimination.

In his Request, complainant argues that the EEOC District Office which

heard his complaint did not have jurisdiction, and also contends that

the agency artificially rated another employee too high.

After reconsidering the previous decision and the entire record, the

Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria of 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

the request. Complainant failed to present sufficient evidence that

would establish the prior decision is clearly erroneous. The decision

in EEOC Appeal No. 0120083137 remains the Commission's final decision.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0408)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 6, 2009

Date

1 Another issue was withdrawn prior to the filing of the appeal, and is

not the subject of this decision.

??

??

??

??

2

0520090088

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

3

0520090088