Mike Hegazy, Complainant,v.Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 7, 2000
01993898 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 7, 2000)

01993898

12-07-2000

Mike Hegazy, Complainant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Mike Hegazy v. Department of Agriculture

01993898

December 7, 2000

.

Mike Hegazy,

Complainant,

v.

Daniel R. Glickman,

Secretary,

Department of Agriculture,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01993898

Agency No. CR980676

DECISION

By Notice of Appeal postmarked April 10,1999, complainant filed an

appeal with this Commission from the December 21, 1998 final agency

decision (FAD) dismissing his EEO complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination.<1> In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was

subjected to discrimination based on his religion (Muslim) and in reprisal

for his prior protected activity when he was treated differently than two

other EEO complainants, who had similar EEO cases that were informally

resolved, and the agency failed to implement its November 14, 1997 EEO

decision, which found in his favor.

In its final decision, the agency dismissed complainant's claims regarding

the informal resolution of two other EEO complainants' cases on the

grounds of failure to state a claim. With regard to complainant's

contention of noncompliance with a prior final decision, the agency

noted that such contentions are not properly pursued through new EEO

complaints and indicated that the issue was being properly processed in

accordance with 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504.

Upon review, we find that the agency's decision was proper. As a matter

of law, a settlement offer does not give rise to a viable allegation.

Such offers do not adversely affect a term, condition or privilege of

employment. Further, in the Commission's view, settlement negotiations,

including any statements and proposals made therein, are to be treated as

confidential and privileged in order to facilitate candid interchange

to settle disputes informally. To allow complainant to base a new

complaint on a settlement offer would defeat this purpose. Montague

v. Department of the Army, EEOC Request No. 05920321 (September 16,

1997), citing Olitsky v. Spencer Gifts, Inc., 843 F.2d 123, (5th Cir.),

cert. denied, 488 U.S. 925 (1988). Furthermore, we note that the agency

properly dismissed complainant's claim of noncompliance with a final

agency decision as a new complaint and properly initiated processing

of that claim in accordance with EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision is hereby AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 7, 2000

__________________

Date

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify

that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________

Date

______________________________

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.