Miguel A. Contreras, et al., Appellant,v.Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 25, 1999
05980856 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 25, 1999)

05980856

10-25-1999

Miguel A. Contreras, et al., Appellant, v. Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary, Department of the Treasury, Agency.


Miguel A. Contreras, et al., )

Appellant, )

) Request No. 05980856

v. ) Appeal No. 01961671

)

Lawrence H. Summers, )

Secretary, )

Department of the Treasury, )

Agency. )

)

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

On June 8, 1998, the Department of the Treasury (hereinafter referred to

as the agency) initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (the Commission) to reconsider the decision in Miguel

A. Contreras, et al. v. Robert E. Rubin, Secretary, Department of the

Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. 01961671 (May 11, 1998). EEOC regulations

provide that the Commissioners may, in their discretion, reconsider

any previous Commission decision. 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(a). The party

requesting reconsideration must submit written argument or evidence which

tends to establish one or more of the following three criteria: new and

material evidence is available that was not readily available when the

previous decision was issued, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(1); the previous

decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law, regulation,

or material fact, or a misapplication of established policy, 29

C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(2); and the decision is of such exceptional nature as

to have substantial precedential implications, 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c)(3).

After a review of the agency's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

agency's request does not meet the criteria in 29 C.F.R. �1614.407(c).

Therefore, it is the decision of the Commission to deny the agency's

request.<1> The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01961671 (May 11, 1998)

remains the Commission's final decision. The agency shall comply with

the provisions of the Order set forth below. There is no further right

of administrative appeal on a decision of the Commission on this Request

for Reconsideration.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded class complaint in

accordance with 29 C.F.R. �1614.204(e) et seq. Within fifteen (15)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, the agency shall

notify all class members of the acceptance of the class complaint in

accordance with the requirements of �1614.204(e). Within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, the agency shall

provide the appropriate EEOC District Office with a copy of the notice

sent to the class members, and shall request the appointment of an

administrative judge, who shall undertake the continued processing of

the complaint pursuant to �1614.204(f) et seq. The agency shall provide

a copy of the notice of certification and request for appointment of an

administrative judge to the Compliance Officer, as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0595)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the appellant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the appellant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503 (a). The appellant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408, 1614.409, and 1614.503 (g). Alternatively,

the appellant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.408 and 1614.409. A civil action for

enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to

the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �2000e-16(c) (Supp. V 1993). If the

appellant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. �1614.410.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS ON REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0993)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right of

administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the right

to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court.

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. If you file a civil action,

YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE

OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS

OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in

the dismissal of your case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the

national organization, and not the local office, facility or department

in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Oct. 25, 1999

Date Frances M. Hart

Executive Officer

Executive Secretariat1With regard to

the agency's request for clarification,

the Commission notes that a class agent

has limited access to precertification

discovery, and that an Administrative

Judge has the latitude to redefine

a class, subdivide it, or recommend

dismissal if it is discovered that

there is no longer a basis to proceed

as a class complaint. Hines, et

al. V. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05940917 (January

29, 1996).