01a00560
04-03-2000
Michael Steger, Complainant, v. Louis Caldera, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.
Michael Steger, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No.01A00560
) Agency No.ACPERS No. 9906J0350
Louis Caldera, )
Secretary, )
Department of the Army, )
Agency. )
)
DECISION
The complainant timely filed an appeal with this Commission from a final
decision, dated September 7, 1999, which the agency issued pursuant
to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107.<1> The Commission accepts the complainant's
appeal pursuant to 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified
at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).
The complainant alleged that in reprisal for his prior EEO activity,
the agency suspended his local security clearance and subjected him to
the �harassment of psychological examinations.� The agency dismissed
the complaint for failure to state a claim because, even though the
complainant had received notice that his security clearance was under
review because of unfavorable letters written by his supervisors,
he purportedly had not demonstrated a material, tangible loss or harm
associated with an entitlement of employment.
After a review of the record in its entirety, including consideration
of all statements submitted on appeal, it is the decision of the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission to REVERSE the final agency decision.
The Commission is precluded from reviewing the substance of security
clearance decisions, or the validity of the security requirement
itself. See "Policy Guidance on the Use of the National Security
Exception Contained in 703(g) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, as amended," EEOC Notice No. N-915-041 (May 1, 1989). However, the
Commission is not precluded from determining whether the grant, denial,
or revocation of a security clearance was conducted in a nondiscriminatory
manner. Schroeder v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05930248
(April 14, 1994); and Thierjung v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request
No. 05880664 (November 2, 1989). Thus, even though a security clearance
is not an entitlement of employment, the writing of letters which led to
the suspension of the complainant's local security clearance, allegedly
for an unlawful motive, states a claim of unlawful retaliation upon
which a determination may be rendered.
In addition, even if the instruction to undergo a command directed
psychiatric evaluation is viewed as a preliminary step to a personnel
action, the Section-by-Section analysis of 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(e) at 57
Fed. Reg. 12643 (April 10, 1992), states:
if the individual alleges, however, that the preliminary step was taken
for the purpose of harassing the individual for a prohibited reason,
the complaint cannot be dismissed under this section because it has
already affected the employee.
Id. at 12643. The complainant alleges that the requirement that he
undergo psychological examinations was harassment. Therefore, the claim
cannot be dismissed as a preliminary step to taking a personnel action.
Moreover, if the complainant was required to undergo a psychiatric
evaluation because of his prior EEO activity, such conduct could deter
other employees from exercising their legal rights under 29 C.F.R. Part
1614. According, the Commission finds that the complainant's second
allegation also states a claim under 29 C.F.R. Part 1614.
ORDER (E1199)
The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with
64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to
the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty
(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency
shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall
notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty
(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the
matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant
requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue
a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's
request.
A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and an
copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of
rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)
Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.
The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)
calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action.
The report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office
of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,
P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must
contain supporting documentation, and the agency must send a copy of
all submissions to the complainant. If the agency does not comply with
the Commission's order, the complainant may petition the Commission for
enforcement of the order. 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(a). The complainant
also has the right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with
the Commission's order prior to or following an administrative petition
for enforcement. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be
codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. ��1614.407, 1614.408),
and 29 C.F.R. �1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the
right to file a civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance
with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action."
29 C.F.R. ��1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or
a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject to the deadline
stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant
files a civil action, the administrative processing of the complaint,
including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.409).
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION
(R1199)
This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative
processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil
action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United
States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date
that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT IN
THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to
file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be
filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right
to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
April 3, 2000
DATE
Carlton
M.
Hadden,
Acting
Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that the
decision was mailed to the complainant, the complainant's representative,
and the agency on:
DATE Equal Employment Assistant1On November 9, 1999, revised
regulations governing the EEOC's federal sector complaint process
went into effect. These regulations apply to all federal sector
EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative process.
Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding
the present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be
found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.