01a01682
05-26-2000
Michael L. Hamilton, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Michael L. Hamilton v. United States Postal Service
01A01682
May 26, 2000
Michael L. Hamilton, )
Complainant, )
)
v. ) Appeal No. 01A01682
) Agency No. 4-D-290-0120-99
William J. Henderson, )
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
The Commission finds that the agency's November 30, 1999 decision
dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim and because it
raises the same claim that is pending before or has been decided by
the agency or Commission, is proper pursuant to the provisions of 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1)).<1>
The record shows that in the instant complaint, filed on October 20,
1999, Complainant claimed that he had been discriminated against on
the basis of reprisal when: (1) on September 4, 1999, several employees
informed him that during a meeting, the station manager said he disliked
Complainant and did not respect him because of the frivolous grievances
Complainant filed and because of Complainant's attempts to get rid of
him; and, (2) on September 14, 1999, Complainant was issued a notice of
emergency suspension and a letter of removal.
The agency issued a final decision dismissing claim (1) for failure
to state a claim. Claim (2) was dismissed on the grounds that it
had already been raised in Agency Case No. 4-D-290-0004-00, filed by
Complainant on November 3, 1999, and accepted for investigation by the
agency on November 30, 1999.
The Commission has consistently held that a remark or comment
unaccompanied by any concrete effect does not render a complainant
aggrieved. Fuller v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05910324 (May 2, 1991).
Accordingly, we find that claim (1) was properly dismissed on the basis
of failure to state a claim.
A review of the record shows that on October 1, 1999, Complainant filed
Agency Case No. 4-D-290-0004-00. In said case, Complainant raised the
issues of the notice of removal and his placement in emergency suspension
on September 14, 1999. Accordingly, the agency properly dismissed claim
(2) on the grounds that it raised the same matter that was raised in a
rpeviously filed EEO complaint.
In conclusion, the final agency decision is hereby AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS
THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
May 26, 2000
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify
that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
____________ _________________________________
DATE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT ASSISTANT
1 On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal
sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all
Federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative
process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations
found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the
present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the
Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.