Michael D. Williams, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionOct 17, 2001
01995978_r (E.E.O.C. Oct. 17, 2001)

01995978_r

10-17-2001

Michael D. Williams, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Michael D. Williams v. United States Postal Service

01995978

October 17, 2001

.

Michael D. Williams,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01995978

Agency No. 1G-753-0073-99

DECISION

The instant appeal is from an agency decision which dismissed

complainant's complaint for untimely EEO Counselor contact pursuant to 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2). Complainant timely appealed the agency's decision

dated June 25, 1999, dismissing his complaint of discrimination alleging

that on the bases of religion (Rastafarian) and disability (lower back),

on February 1, 1999, complainant was notified by an arbitration decision

of his termination from the agency.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.105(a)(1) requires complaints of

discrimination to be brought to the attention of the EEO Counselor within

forty-five (45) days of the date of the claimed discriminatory matter,

or, in the case of a personnel action, within forty-five (45) days of

the effective date of the action.

In its decision, the agency dismissed complainant's complaint on the

ground that complainant failed to contact an EEO Counselor within

the prescribed time frames. Specifically, the agency asserted that

complainant was issued a notice of removal dated January 13, 1998,

which became effective on February 18, 1998, but that complainant did

not initiate contact with an EEO Counselor until February 1, 1999.

Complainant's informal complaint of discrimination indicates that

complainant's initial contact with an EEO Counselor occurred on March

10, 1999. The Commission notes that the EEO Counselor's report was

not included in the record. In addition, there is no documentary

evidence in the record indicating when complainant was removed from his

position or when he knew of his removal. The agency has not shown that

complainant knew about his removal prior to February 1, 1999; however,

complainant states nothing on appeal to rebut the agency's position.

The Commission cannot determine whether complainant's contact with an

EEO Counselor was timely based on the scant information contained in

the record. The Commission requests that the agency supplement the

record to clarify when complainant was issued a notice of removal from

his position and when that removal became effective.

Therefore, the agency's decision is VACATED, and the complaint is REMANDED

to the agency for further processing in accordance with the Order below.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to conduct a supplemental investigation and place

evidence in the record establishing the date on which complainant was

issued a notice of removal from his position with the agency, evidence of

when complainant received notice of his removal, and when that removal

became effective. The agency shall then issue a new decision within 30

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. A copy of the

decision must be submitted to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate

United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the

date that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

October 17, 2001

__________________

Date