Michael Arnold, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 12, 2005
01a40708 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 12, 2005)

01a40708

07-12-2005

Michael Arnold, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Michael Arnold v. United States Postal Service

01A40708

07-12-05

.

Michael Arnold,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A40708

Agency No. 4F-945-1076-96

DECISION

Complainant timely initiated an appeal from a final agency decision

(FAD) concerning his attorney's petition for fees incurred in connection

with his successful prosecution of a complaint of unlawful employment

discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. The appeal is accepted

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405.

As is detailed in our decision on the merits of this matter, Arnold

v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 07A20087 (June

25, 2003), an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) found that complainant

successfully prosecuted a claim of race and sex discrimination when his

position was put up for bid. The agency issued an order that rejected the

findings of the AJ and filed an appeal with the Commission. On appeal,

the Commission reversed the agency's order. Complainant was awarded

remedial relief, including an order directing the agency to reimburse

him for reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection to his case.<1>

Subsequently, complainant's counsel submitted a petition seeking an

award of $20,497.94 in fees and costs for services related to opposing

the agency's appeal. The petition contains entries describing the legal

services rendered in increments of 1/10th of an hour. It is supported

by a statement from A-1, complainant's counsel, outlining the services

that she and B-1, her legal clerk who is a member of the bar, performed

on behalf of complainant. The fees requested are set forth as follows:

46.60 hours @ $375.00 per hour ($17,475.00) for A-1; 18.05 hours @

$160.00 per hour ($2,888.00) for B-1; and costs of $134.94.

In its final agency decision, the agency determined that complainant

was only entitled to reimbursement in the amount of $17,628.23 in fees

and costs. The agency did not take issue with the hourly rate claimed

by A-1, but concluded that the amount of time spent �on research and on

procedural matters� was excessive due to A-1's expertise in litigating

employment issues.

LEGAL STANDARD

The Commission may award complainant reasonable attorney's fees and other

costs incurred in the processing of a complaint regarding allegations

of discrimination in violation of Title VII. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e).

A finding of discrimination raises a presumption of an entitlement to an

award of attorney's fees. Id. An award of attorney's fees is determined

by calculating the lodestar, i.e., by multiplying a reasonable hourly

fee times a reasonable number of hours expended. Hensley v. Eckerhart,

461 U.S. 424 (1983); 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(2)(ii)(B). There is a strong

presumption that this amount represents the reasonable fee. 29 C.F.R. �

1614.501(e)(2)(ii)(B). A reasonable hourly fee is the prevailing market

rate in the relevant community. Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886 (1984).

A petition for fees and costs must take the form of the verified statement

required by the Commission's regulations at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.501(e)(2)(i).

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

We find the legal services reflected in complainant's fee petition are

reasonable. The agency offers nothing to support its position other

than its conclusory assertion that A-1 and/or B-1 spent an excessive

amount of time on research and procedural matters. There is no basis for

this conclusion. In this regard, we note that the subject fee petition

covers the period shortly before and after the agency rejected the AJ's

decision and filed its appeal. During this period, A-1 explained the

AJ's decision to complainant, discussed his options should the agency

file an appeal, reviewed the agency's appeal, wrote the appeal brief

and kept complainant informed about the status of the case. B-1, among

other things, was tasked with researching cases and drafting arguments.

Without some evidence or argument to support the agency's position

that A-1 and/or B-1 spent an excessive amount of time on research and

procedural matters, we are unable to conclude that the amount of time

expended was excessive.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, we find that Complainant is entitled to an

award of $20,497.94 in attorney's fees and costs.

ORDER

Within thirty days from the date this decision becomes final, to the

extent it has not already done so, the agency shall tender to complainant:

$20,497.94 in attorney's fees and costs. The agency is further directed

to submit a report of compliance, as provided in the statement entitled

"Implementation of the Commission's Decision." The report shall include

supporting documentation of the agency's payments to complainant.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

______07-12-05____________

Date

1On appeal, the Commission upheld the AJ's award of $37,599.27 in attorney

fees and costs.