Michael A. Russo, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 18, 2010
0120092219 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 18, 2010)

0120092219

06-18-2010

Michael A. Russo, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Michael A. Russo,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092219

Agency No. 4H-320-0039-09

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the Agency's

decision dated April 13, 2009, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. and Section

501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that Complainant's

complaint was improperly dismissed for failure to state a claim.

In his complaint, Complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the bases of sex (male) and disability (back) when:

1. On December 10, 2008, Complainant was told to deliver mail or go home,

which was allegedly a violation of his medical instructions; and

2. On December 10, 2008, the manager discussed Complainant's medical

condition with another employee.

The Agency dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim.

It determined that claim 1 was resolved on January 29, 2009, during a

negotiated grievance procedure; therefore, Complainant was not aggrieved.

The Agency further concluded that claim 2 was never brought to the

attention of an EEO Counselor and, thus, could not be admitted. Lastly,

the Agency determined that the totality of the actions discussed in

the complaint were not sufficiently severe or pervasive to rise to the

level of a hostile work environment. On appeal, Complainant makes no new

assertions. Complainant requests that we overturn the Agency's dismissal.

The Agency requests that we affirm the dismissal.

Although the Agency dismissed Complainant's claim for failure to state a

claim, we find that this claim is more properly analyzed as to whether

it has been rendered moot. The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. �

1614.107(a)(5) provides for the dismissal of a complaint when the issues

raised therein are moot. To determine whether the issues raised in

complainant's complaint are moot, the trier of fact must ascertain whether

(1) it can be said with assurance that there is no reasonable expectation

that the alleged violation will recur; and (2) interim relief or events

have completely and irrevocably eradicated the effects of the alleged

discrimination. See County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631

(1979); Kuo v. Department of the Navy, EEOC Request No. 05970343 (July

10, 1998). When such circumstances exist, no relief is available and

no need for a determination of the rights of the parties is presented.

In the instant case, the record shows that Complainant filed a grievance

on December 10, 2008, regarding the matter alleged in claim 1. A

settlement was reached on January 29, 2009, which resulted in payment for

the time during which Complainant was sent home. While Complainant's pay

and time were corrected, the record reflects that Complainant requested

compensatory damages during EEO counseling and in his formal complaint.

The Commission has held that an agency must address the issue of

compensatory damages when a complainant shows objective evidence that he

has incurred compensatory damages, and that the damages are related to

the alleged discrimination. Jackson v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Appeal No. 01923399 (November 12, 1992), request for reconsideration

denied, EEOC Request No. 05930306 (February 1, 1993). Because Complainant

requested compensatory damages, the Agency should have requested

that Complainant provide some objective proof of the alleged damages

incurred, as well as objective evidence linking those damages to the

adverse actions at issue. See Allen v. United States Postal Service,

EEOC Request No. 05970672 (June 12, 1998); Benton v. Department of

Defense, EEOC Appeal No. 01932422 (December 3, 1993). If Complainant

were to prevail, the possibility of an award of compensatory damages

exists; therefore, though a settlement was reached and payment was made,

Complainant's complaint is not moot. See Glover v. United States Postal

Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01930696 (December 9, 1993).

Regarding claim 2, the regulation set forth in 29 C.F.R � 1614.107(a)(2)

provides that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that raises a matter

that has not been brought to the attention of an EEO Counselor and is

not like or related to a matter that has been brought to the attention

of an EEO Counselor. A later claim or complaint is "like or related"

to the original complaint if the later claim or complaint adds to or

clarifies the original complaint and could have reasonably been expected

to grow out of the original complaint during the investigation. See

Scher v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05940702 (May 30,

1995); Calhoun v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05891068

(March 8, 1990). We note that a review of the record reveals no evidence

that the matter in dispute in claim 2 was brought to the attention of

the EEO Counselor during counseling, nor is the matter raised in claim

2 like or related to the

matter that was raised during counseling, being sent home when no work

was available. Therefore, we find that the Agency properly dismissed

claim 2.

Accordingly, upon review of the record and for the foregoing reasons,

the Agency's final decision is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part. The

issue of compensatory damages is REMANDED for further processing in

accordance with the Order set out below.

ORDER (E0900)

The Agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with 29

C.F.R. � 1614.108. The Agency shall acknowledge to Complainant that it

has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar days of the

date this decision becomes final. The Agency shall issue to Complainant

a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify Complainant of

the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of

the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If Complainant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the Agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of Complainant's request.

A copy of the Agency's letter of acknowledgment to Complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The Agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The Agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the Agency must send a copy of all submissions to

Complainant. If the Agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

Complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). Complainant also has the right to file a civil

action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior to or

following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

Complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to

File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil

action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is

subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993).

If Complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if Complainant or the Agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the Agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (T0900)

This decision affirms the Agency's final decision in part, but it also

requires the Agency to continue its administrative processing of a

portion of your complaint. You have the right to file a civil action in

an appropriate United States District Court within ninety (90) calendar

days from the date that you receive this decision on both that portion

of your complaint which the Commission has affirmed and that portion

of the complaint which has been remanded for continued administrative

processing. In the alternative, you may file a civil action after

one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date you filed your

complaint with the Agency, or your appeal with the Commission, until

such time as the Agency issues its final decision on your complaint.

If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in the

complaint the person who is the official Agency head or department head,

identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 18, 2010______________

Date

2

0120092219

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

2

0120092219