01994594
10-13-1999
Merin J. Oakley, Appellant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.
Merin J. Oakley, )
Appellant, )
)
v. )
) Appeal No. 01994594
William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 1-G-741-0034-99
Postmaster General, )
United States Postal Service, )
Agency. )
______________________________)
DECISION
On May 11, 1999, appellant filed a timely appeal with this Commission
from a final agency decision (FAD), dated April 15, 1999, dismissing a
portion of his complaint for failure to state a claim. The Commission
accepts the appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.
On April 6, 1999, appellant filed a formal complaint alleging that he was
discriminated against on the basis of retaliation. Therein, appellant
addressed various incidents of alleged discrimination and stated that
he was the victim of ongoing harassment.
In its final decision, the agency defined the allegations as follows:
On January 18, 1999, Person A performed bargaining unit work;
On January 23, 1999, appellant's duty hours were changed;
On February 9, 1999, Person B was assigned to 010 to intimidate
appellant;
On February 24 and 27, 1999, appellant was denied overtime; and,
On February 25-26, 1999, appellant was denied annual leave.
The agency dismissed allegations 1 and 3 for failure to state a claim,
pursuant to 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a). Allegations 2, 4, and 5 were accepted
for further processing. The FAD indicated that appellant failed to
show that he suffered a harm as a result of the agency's action in the
dismissed allegations.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a) provides, in relevant part, that
an agency shall dismiss a complaint, or portion thereof, that fails to
state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved
employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion,
sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. �1614.103;
�1614.106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has long
defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss
with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which
there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force, EEOC Request
No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).
In the instant case, we find that the agency properly dismissed
allegations 1 and 3 for failure to state a claim. The allegations fail to
show how appellant suffered a harm or loss regarding a term, condition or
privilege of employment. We do not find that the performance of craft
work or the assignment of a person renders appellant an �aggrieved�
employee. The Commission notes that in his formal complaint, appellant
alleges that he was the victim of ongoing harassment. However, a review
of the record reflects that the matters addressed in allegations 1 and 3,
even when considered together with the allegations accepted by the agency
for investigation, are insufficient to support a claim of harassment.
See Cobb v. Department of the Treasury, EEOC Request No. 05970077 (March
13, 1997). Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing allegations
1 and 3 for failure to state a claim is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0795)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available
when the previous decision was issued; or
2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,
regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or
3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial
precedential implications.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST
BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this
decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive
a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in
opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider
MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party
WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request
to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments
must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,
the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received
by the Commission.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances
have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,
a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the
delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your
request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests
for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited
circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).
RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)
It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file
a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN
NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.
You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have
interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that
a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the
date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action
is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)
CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult
an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction
in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a
civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date
you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the
Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT
IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT
HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.
"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the
local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
October 13, 1999
__________________________________
DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations