McDonnell Aircraft Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsSep 28, 194879 N.L.R.B. 1054 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of MCDONNELL AIRCRAFT CORPORATION, EMPLOYER and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL No. 1, AFL, PETITIONER and INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF FIREMEN AND OILERS AND MAINTENANCE MEN, LOCAL 6, AFL, PETITIONER Case Nos. 14-RC-108 and 14-RC-223.-Decided September 28, 1948 DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS Upon petitions duly filed, a hearing was held before a hearing officer of the National Labor Relations Board. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial error and are hereby affirmed. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor Relations Act, the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-man panel consisting of the undersigned Board Members.* Upon the entire record in this case, the Board finds : 1. The Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 2. The labor organizations named below claim to represent em- ployees of the Employer." 3. A question affecting commerce exists concerning the representa- tion of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. 4. The following groups of employees at the Employer's Lambert Field, St. Louis, Missouri, aircraft plant may constitute, respectively, separate units appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act : 2 •Houston, Reynolds , and Gray. I International Association of Machinists, District No. 9, which has represented the Employer 's production and maintenance employees since 1941 , was represented at the hearing and does not oppose the petitions filed herein . It does not desire to participate in the elections directed below. 2 The Employer contends that the existing plant-wide unit is the only appropriate unit and urges that the petitions herein be dismissed . In spite of varying skills among the Employer 's electricians , we find, in accordance with our holding in previous cases involving the aircraft industry , that such electricians constitute a well-defined craft group. We further find that the powerhouse employees constitute a functionally coherent , homogeneous and traditional bargaining group of employees . Despite the previous history of bar- 79 N. L. R. B., No. 136. 1054 McDONNELL AIRCRAFT CORPORATION 1055 (a) All construction and maintenance electricians, their helpers and apprentices, including those included in the classifications elec- trician-maintenance, Grades 1 and 2,3 but excluding clerical employees, guards, professional employees, and all supervisors. (b) All employees at the Employer's powerhouse, including those classified as firemen, Grades 1 and 2, and maintenance mechanics, Grades 1, 2, and 3, but excluding the chief boilerhouse engineer, sta- tionary engineers,4 and all other supervisors. However, we shall make no final unit determinations at this time, but shall be guided in part by the desires of these employees as ex- pressed in the elections hereinafter directed. If a majority in either voting group vote for the Petitioner for that group, they will be taken to have indicated their desire to constitute a separate appropriate unit. DIRECTION OF ELECTIONS As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with the Employer, separate elec- tions by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than 30 days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Region in which this case was heard, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations- Series 5, as amended, among the employees in the two groups described below, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction of Elections, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired gaining on a more comprehensive basis, employees in these two separate groups may, if they desire, constitute separate units appropriate for purposes of collective bargaining. Matter of Smith Paper, Inc., 76 N. L. R. B. 1226; Matter of Lockheed Aircraft Corporation, 77 N. L. R. B. 507; Matter of Consolidated Vultee Aircraft Corporation, 75 N. L. It. B. 1276. s The Employer also contends that some of the electricians engaged part-time in the operation of electric cranes should be excluded from the proposed unit. We do not agree with this contention. In connection with its production of aircraft, the Employer has six electric cranes which are, at times, operated by certain electricians in the unit described in paragraph 4 (a) above. However, the record indicates, and we find, that all the Employer's electricians in Grades 1 and 2 are primarily engaged in electrical construction and maintenance work. We shall accordingly include them in the voting group. The Employer's classifications also include electrician-maintenance Grade 3 and learner. helper Since, however, the Employer appears to have no employees in these classifications, we shall make no determination concerning their unit placement at the present time. 4 It appears from the record, and the Petitioner concedes, that the Employer's stationary engineers are supervisors within the meaning of the Act. Therefore, we shall exclude them from the proposed unit. 1056 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD or reinstated prior 'to the date of 'the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement: (1) among the construction and maintenance. electricians described in paragraph 4 (a) above to determine whether or not they desire to be represented, for purposes of collective bargaining, by International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local No. 1, AFL; and (2) among the powerhouse employees described in paragraph 4 (b) above, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented, for purposes of collective bargain- ing, by International Brotherhood of Firemen and Oilers and Mainte- nance Men, Local 6, AFL. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation