Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJul 10, 194774 N.L.R.B. 480 (N.L.R.B. 1947) Copy Citation In the Matter of MATTHIESSEN & HECELER ZINC COMPANY, EMPLOYER and M & H ZINC WORKERS UNION, LOCAL No. 80, IUMSWA (CIO), PETITIONER Case No. 13-R-4388.-Decided July 10, 1,947 Cassels, Potter ct Bentley, by Mr. Richard H. Merrick and Messrs. C. R. MacBrayne and L. J. Johns, of Chicago, Ill., for the Employer. Messrs. Leon Despres and Frank Gerace, of Oglesby, Ill., for the Petitioner. Mr. John R. Gallagher, of La Salle, Ill., for the Intervenor. Mr. Stanley Segal, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at La Salle, Illinois, on May 28, 1947, before Robert Ackerberg, hearing officer. The hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the 'entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board makes the following: FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Company is an Illinois corporation with its principal place of business and only plant located in La Salle, Illinois, where it is engaged in the smelting and fabricating of zinc. The Employer annually purchases raw materials valued in excess of $1,000,000, of which approximately 90 percent is purchased from points outside the State of Illinois. It annually sells finished products valued in excess of $1,500,000, of which approximately 50 percent is shipped to points outside the State. The Employer admits and we find that it is engaged in commerce -within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act. 74 N L. R. B, No. 87. 480 0 MATTHIESSEN & HEGELER ZINC COMPANY II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED 481 The Petitioner, M & H Zinc Workers Union, Local No. 80, Indus- trial Union of Mamie and Shipbuilding Workers of America, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organ- izations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. Local No. 80, International Union, Mine, Mill & Smelters Workers, herein called the Intervenor, is a labor organization affiliated with the Congress of Industrial Organizations, claiming to represent employees of the Employer. III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in an appropriate unit. We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Employer, within the meaning of'Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.' IV. THE APPROPRIATE ]UNIT In substantial accordance with the agreement of the parties, Ave find that all production and maintenance employees of the Employer, excluding office and clerical employees, full-time weighinen, watch- men, laboratory employees, foremen, assistant foremen, working fore- man, and all other supervisory employees, constitute a unit appropri- ate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Section 9 (b) of the Act. V. THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES We shall direct that the question concerning representation which has arisen be resolved by an election by secret ballot, subject to the limitations and additions set forth in the Direction. The Petitioner desires to appear on the ballot as "M & H Zinc Workers Union, Local No. 80, I. U. M. S. W. A. (CIO)." The Inter- venor desires to appear on, the ballot as "Local No. 80, International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, CIO." The Petitioner objects to the Intervenor's proposed designation, insofar as it contains the words "Local No. 80," claiming that the members of Local No. 80 'None of the pasties specifically contends that it 1946 contract between the Employer and the Intervenor constitutes a bar to the proceeding, nor could such a contention be validly advanced, inasmuch as the petition in this case was filed before the 1947 effective date of the automatic renecial clause of the agreement. 6 482 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOAR]) properly disaffiliated from, and returned their charter to, Interna- tional Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, CIO; and that they thereafter affiliated with, and received a charter as Local No. 80 from, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, CIO. We shall designate the Intervenor on the ballot in the form it desires, and we shall place the Petitioner on the ballot under its full name: "M. & H. Zinc Workers Union, Local No. 80, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, CIO." The words "Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America" in the Petitioner's designation, and the words "International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers" in the Intervenor's designation, should eliminate confusion if conspicuously printed on the ballot, and thereby clearly indicate to the voters the identity of the competing labor organizations. DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the pilr- poses of collective bargaining with Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Com- pany, La Salle, Illinois, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the Thirteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Sections 203.55 and 203.56, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regula- tious-Series 4, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and including employees in the armed forces of the United States who present themselves in person at the polls, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or reinstated prior to the date of the election, to determine whether they desire to be represented by Al. & H. Zinc Workers Union, Local No. 80, Indus- trial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, CIO, or by Local No. 80, International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers, CIO, for the purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. 2 Any participant in the election herein order ed may, upon its prompt request to, and approval thereof by , the Regional Director, have its name removed from the ballot. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation