Mary S. Lovelady Complainant,v.Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 22, 2000
01a00073 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 22, 2000)

01a00073

12-22-2000

Mary S. Lovelady Complainant, v. Hershel W. Gober, Acting Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Mary S. Lovelady v. Department of Veterans Affairs

01A00073

12-22-00

.

Mary S. Lovelady

Complainant,

v.

Hershel W. Gober,

Acting Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A00073

Agency No. 98-3159

DISMISSAL

On September 30, 1999, complainant filed an appeal with this Commission

from a final agency decision, dated August 11, 1999, dismissing her

complaint.<1> By regulation, appeals to the Commission must be filed

within thirty (30) calendar days after a complainant receives the final

agency decision. Appeals are deemed filed on the date received by the

Commission, unless postmarked earlier. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(b).

In this case, the certified return mail receipt indicates that a

family member, later identified as complainant's husband, received

the agency's final decision at their home address on August 16, 1999.

Complainant's appeal on September 30, 1999 was, therefore, beyond the

thirty (30) day time limit set by the Regulations. A review of the

final agency decision indicates that complainant was provided appeal

rights to the Commission, which included information on the 30-day time

limitation period for filing an appeal. On appeal, she indicated that

she did not discover the final decision until September 19, 1999, when

she was examining �magazines, advertisements and mail [that had been]

received weeks earlier.� According to complainant, she had been out of

the state for about two weeks and her husband placed the final decision

in a stack of mail for her to review when she returned. We find that

complainant has not presented an adequate justification for extending

or waiving the appeal filing period beyond thirty days.<2> Accordingly,

the appeal is DISMISSED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____12-22-00__________________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.

2We note in this regard that complainant did not explain why, after

discovering the final decision on September 19, 1999, she waited 11 more

days before she filed the one page appeal form with the Commission.