Mary A. Brandon, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 11, 2001
01A15156_r (E.E.O.C. Dec. 11, 2001)

01A15156_r

12-11-2001

Mary A. Brandon, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Mary A. Brandon v. United States Postal Service

01A15156

December 11, 2001

.

Mary A. Brandon,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A15156

Agency No. 4E-852-0052-01

DECISION

Upon review, the Commission finds that the agency's decision that it

did not breach the settlement agreement that the parties had reached is

proper. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504. The record indicates that on February

15, 2001, the parties entered into a settlement agreement resolving

complainant's complaint. The settlement agreement provided, in pertinent

part, that complainant is willing to be loaned (�farmed out�) to other

post offices unless she stipulates otherwise in a written note. On July

12, 2001, complainant alleged that the agency breached the settlement

agreement when she was asked on June 23, 2001 and July 11, 2001 whether

she wanted to be loaned out to other offices. Complainant stated that

she provided written notice on March 3, 2001, that she would like not

to be loaned out and argues that the two subsequent requests for her to

be loaned out breached the agreement. In addition, complainant states

that the agency's repeated requests to loan her out constitute harassment.

After a review of the record, the Commission finds that complainant has

failed to show non-compliance with the February 15, 2001 agreement.

We note that the agreement did not prohibit the agency from asking

complainant whether she wanted to be loaned out, but rather stated

that where complainant provided written notification that she did not

want to be loaned out, the agency would not loan her out. Complainant

has not shown that she was loaned out in violation of the agreement.

Further, the Commission notes that claims concerning subsequent acts

of discrimination must be processed as separate complaints, not claims

of breach. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504(c). Therefore, complainant's claim

that the agency's requests to loan her out constitutes discriminatory

harassment does not breach the agreement, but should be processed as a

subsequent claim of discrimination. If complainant wishes to raise this

claim and has not already done so, she should contact an EEO Counselor

within fifteen days of receiving this decision. The Commission does not

address in this decision whether such a claim, if raised in a complaint

of discrimination, would be properly dismissed for failing to state a

claim pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1).

Accordingly, the agency's decision that it did not breach the agreement

is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 11, 2001

__________________

Date