Marvin J. Vigil, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 26, 2001
01A12047_r (E.E.O.C. Jul. 26, 2001)

01A12047_r

07-26-2001

Marvin J. Vigil, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Marvin J. Vigil v. United States Postal Service

01A12047

July 26, 2001

.

Marvin J. Vigil,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A12047

Agency No. 4E-870-0060-00

DECISION

The record indicates that complainant appeals from the agency's decision

not to reinstate his complaint of unlawful employment discrimination that

the parties had settled. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.504. The record indicates

that on October 19, 2000, the parties entered into a settlement agreement

resolving complainant's complaint. The settlement agreement provided,

in pertinent part, that:

5. Complainant will provide his manager past dates and receipts from

prior doctor/medical appointments. If taken during regular work tour,

complainant will be reimbursed for time taken without pay or leave

if it is an �approved� injury claim. If not �approved� by OWCP, then

complainant needs to submit a CA-7. Dates will be from September 1999

to current.

6. Complainant's manager agrees to pay complainant a lump sum of $600.00

less appropriate deductions.

On December 11, 2000, complainant alleged that the agency breached the

settlement agreement when he did not receive his leave reimbursement

and $600.00 under items 5 and 6 thereof. On January 12, 2001, the

agency responded that complainant, through his manager, was provided

with the required documentation needed to file a CA-7 for his leave

reimbursement, and it also submitted a PS.2240 for $600.00 payment.

On appeal, complainant maintains that although he provided his manager

with the dates and receipts of his prior leave, which was all approved

by OWCP, he did not receive the reimbursement. He also maintains that

he has not received $600.00. There is no evidence in the record to

show that whether complainant was reimbursed for his leave, which was

previously approved by OWCP, under item 5 of the settlement agreement.

Furthermore, there is no evidence in the record to show that complainant

actually received $600.00 less appropriate deduction, despite the

agency's processing thereof, under item 6 of the settlement agreement.

Based on the foregoing, the Commission cannot determine whether the

agency breached the settlement agreement.

Accordingly, the agency's decision not to reinstate complainant's

complaint is VACATED and the matter is REMANDED back to the agency's

for further processing in accordance with the Order below.

ORDER

The agency shall provide in the record evidence which demonstrates that

complainant received reimbursement for time taken without pay or leave

which was an approved injury claim and $600.00 less appropriate deduction

under items 5 and 6 of the October 19, 2000 settlement agreement.

Based on the foregoing information, the agency, within thirty (30)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, shall issue a

decision on the breach claim and/or notify complainant that the agency

is reinstating his complaint for further processing from the point that

processing ceased.

A copy of the agency's final decision and/or the agency's letter of

complaint reinstatement must be sent to the Compliance Officer as

referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 26, 2001

__________________

Date