Martin Madigan, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Midwest Area Office) Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 13, 2001
05980385 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 13, 2001)

05980385

07-13-2001

Martin Madigan, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Great Lakes/Midwest Area Office) Agency.


Martin Madigan v. United State Postal Service

05980385

July 13, 2001

.

Martin Madigan,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Great Lakes/Midwest Area Office)

Agency.

Request No. 05980385

Appeal No. 01981764

Agency No. 4J-460-0013-97

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The agency initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Martin

Madigan v. United State Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01981764

(February 20, 1998). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

The agency alleged that complainant failed to file a timely appeal

with the Commission within 30 calendar days of receipt of the Final

Agency Decision (FAD). Specifically, the agency noted that complainant

received the FAD on July 5, 1997, and filed the appeal on September 8,

1997. The record reveals that complainant's appeal was received by the

Commission on July 31, 1997, well within the required timeframe. Further,

the record shows that complainant filed a separate appeal on September

8, 1997, regarding a different complaint. See Martin Madigan v. United

States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 02970026 (February 20, 1998).

After a review of the request for reconsideration, the previous decision,

and the entire record, the Commission finds that the request fails to

meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision

of the Commission to deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01981764 remains the Commission's final decision and the agency

shall comply with the ORDER set forth therein and restated below.

There is no further right of administrative appeal on the decision of

the Commission on this request for reconsideration.

ORDER

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded allegations in accordance

with 29 C.F.R. �1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the appellant

that it has received the remanded allegations within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify complainant of

the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150) calendar days of

the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter is otherwise

resolved prior to that time. If the appellant requests a final decision

without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision within sixty

(60) days of receipt of appellant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a copy

of the notice that transmits the investigative file and referenced and

notice of rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced

below.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which

to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be

filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right

to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

_____________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 13, 2001

__________________

Date