Marsha Green, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 12, 2003
01A34486 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 12, 2003)

01A34486

12-12-2003

Marsha Green, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Marsha Green v. United States Postal Service

01A34486

December 12, 2003

.

Marsha Green,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A34486

Agency No. 1F-946-0041-03

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated July 3, 2003, dismissing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

and Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act),

as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. In her complaint, complainant

alleged that she was subjected to discrimination on the bases of race,

sex, and disability when:

Complainant received a Letter of Warning, dated November 5, 2002;

Complainant received a work status report dated 11/26/02;

Complainant received a limited duty job offer, dated 11/26/02, in which

the agency failed to accommodate her disability;

Complainant received a five-day no-time-off suspension, dated January

7, 2003;<1>

In a final decision dated July 3, 2003, the agency dismissed the complaint

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7) for failure to cooperate.

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7) provides for the

dismissal of a complaint where the agency has provided the complainant

with a written request to provide relevant information or otherwise

proceed with the complaint, and the complainant has failed to respond to

the request within 15 days of its receipt or the complainant's response

does not address the agency's request, provided that the request included

a notice of the proposed dismissal. The regulation further provides

that, instead of dismissing for failure to cooperate, the complaint may

be adjudicated if sufficient information for that purpose is available.

Under the circumstances in this case, we find that the agency's dismissal

of the complaint was improper. The record indicates that on June 9, 2003,

complainant received a memorandum from the agency requesting that she

clarify her complaint and indicating that failure to do so within 15 days

would result in dismissal of her complaint. According to the agency,

complainant failed to respond to the agency's request for clarification

within the requisite time frame. The Commission finds that together

with other materials submitted by complainant on appeal, she includes a

letter she claimed to submit to the agency, dated June 16, 2003, which

clarifies her complaint, and identifies the four claims enunciated above.

We note that by letter to the complainant dated May 27, 2003, the

agency accepted complainant's complaint for investigation, framing the

complainant's complaint as encompassing two claims, the Letter of Warning

dated 11/3/02 (claim 2 above) and the 5-day, No-Time-Off Suspension,

dated January 7, 2003 (claim 5 above). Further, complainant alleged in

her clarification letter of June 16, 2003, that the limited duty offer

and work status of 11/26/02 were the result of the agency's failure

to accommodate her disability. Moreover, we note that complainant's

complaint, along with the EEO Counselor's Report, addressed the incidents

of alleged discrimination, with reference to the responsible agency

official by name, the bases on which she alleged discrimination, and the

corrective action sought. We find these claims are sufficiently clear

to permit the agency to conduct an adequate investigation. Therefore,

under the circumstances, we find that the agency's dismissal of claims

(1) - (4) for failure to cooperate was improper.

We therefore REVERSE the agency's dismissal of the complaint. We REMAND

the complaint to the agency for further processing as directed herein.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 12, 2003

__________________

Date

1We have framed the claims (1 - 4) of

complainant's complaint as enunciated and clarified in complainant's

letter to the agency, dated June 16, 2003.