Markey Machine Co., Inc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

Jan 4, 1944

54 N.L.R.B. 251 (N.L.R.B. 1944)

In the Matter Of MARIiEY MACHINERY CO., INC. and UNITED
BROTHERHOOD OF WFa DORs, CUTTERS AND HELPERS OF AMERICA,
LOCAL No. 9.
Case No. 19-R-982.-Decided January 4, 1944
Grosscup, Morrow & Ambler, by Mr. John Ambler, of Seattle,
Wash., for the Company and the Association.
Mr. Charles M. Baxter, of Seattle, Wash., for the Weldors.
Mr. L. Presley Gill, of Seattle, Wash., for the I. A. M.
Mr. Glenn L. Moller, of counsel to the Board.
DECISION
AND
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Upon a petition duly filed by United Brotherhood of Weldors,
Cutters and Helpers of America, Local No. 9, herein called the
Weldors, alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen con-
cerning the representation of employees of Markey Machinery Co.,
Inc., Seattle, Washington, herein called the Company, the National
Labor Relations Board provided for an appropriate hearing upon
due notice before John E. Hedrick, Trial Examiner. Said hearing
was held at Seattle, Washington, on September 13, 1943. The Com-
pany, the Weldors, Machinists Union, Local No. 79, International
Association of Machinists, A. F. L., herein called the I. A. M., and
Washington Metal Trades, Inc., appeared, and participated. All
parties were afforded full opportunity to be heard, to examine and
cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the
issues. During the hearing the Company, Washington Metal
Trades, Inc., and the I. A. M. moved to dismiss the petition on the
ground that the Weldors had made no demand for recognition upon
the Company prior to the filing of its petition. For the reasons ap-
pearing in Section III, hereinbelow, the motion is denied. The Trial
Examiner's rulings made at the hearing are free from prejudicial
error and are hereby affirmed. All parties were afforded an oppor-
tunity to file briefs with the Board.
54 N. L. R. B., No. 33.
251
252 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Upon the entire record in the case, tb Board makes the following :
FINDINGS OF FACT
I. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY
Markey Machine Co., Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State
of Washington, has its office and plants in Seattle, Washington. The
Company manufactures at its two plants deck machinery and other
products. The Company also does machine work for other firms
pursuant to contracts. The principal raw materials used by the
Company are steel plate, iron bars, and steel castings. During the
year 1942, the Company purchased raw materials valued at approx-
imately $520,000, approximately 60 percent of which was shipped
to the Company's plants from points outside the State of Washing-
ton. During the same year the Company's gross sales amounted
to approximately $1,500,000, of which approximately 45 percent was
shipped to points outside the State of Washington. Virtually all of
the Company's activities are directly related to the war effort.
The Company admits, and we find, that it is engaged in commerce
within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.
Washington Metal Trades, Inc., herein called the Association, is
a nonprofit association of most of the companies engaged in metal
processing in Seattle, Washington, and vicinity. It represents its
member companies and other companies which have so authorized it,
in collective bargaining negotiations and executes contracts on their
behalf.
II. THE ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED
United Brotherhood of Weldors, Cutters and Helpers of America,
Local No. 9. is an unaffiliated labor organization admitting to member-
ship employees of the Company.
Machinists' Union, Local No. 79, International Association of
Machinists, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, is a
labor organization admitting to m®mbership employees of the
Company.
III. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION
In March 1942, the Weldors requested recognition by the Company
as the exclusive bargaining representative of the welders, cutters, and
their respective helpers in the Company's employ. The Company re-
fused this request, stating that its collective bargaining was handled
by the Association, of which it is a member and that it was already
under contract with the I. A. M. Thereafter the Weldors filed a peti-
tion for investigation and certification, alleging that all welders in the
MARKEY MACHINERY CO., INC. 253
employ of several, but not all, of the companies which were members
of the Association constituted an appropriate unit.' Markey was
one of the companies named in that petition. The Board dismissed
the petition, but without determining the issues presented in the in-
stant proceeding= Although the evidence does not clearly establish
that the formal demand for recognition was renewed after the dis-
missal of the prior case, we are satisfied that the Company knew of the
Weldors claim, not only prior to the filing of the petition in this case,
but before it entered into its contract with Local 79.3 Furthermore,
the Company's refusal to recognize the Weldors prior to the earlier
case was based upon the same objections which it now raises in the
instant proceeding. The Weldors was justified in assuming that a
renewal of its demand would have been an idle gesture.
The Company and the I. A. M. contend that their contract, which
purports to cover "machinist welders," is a bar to the Weldors""
petition. The contract, however, aside from any question as to its
coverage, is not a bar, since pursuant to notice by the I. A. M. of'
intention to renegotiate, it expired on May 31, 1943 and the petition
in the instant proceeding was filed in December 1942, long before the
final date required for such notice.
A statement of an attorney of the Board, introduced into evidence
at the hearing, indicates that the Weldors represents a substantial
number of employees in the unit which it claims to be appropriate.4
We find that a question affecting commerce has arisen concerning
the representation of employees of the Company, within the meaning
of Section 9 (c) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act.
IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT; THE DETERMINATION OF REPRESENTATIVES
The Weldors contends that all welders, cutters, and their respective
helpers employed by the Company at both its plants constitute an ap-
propriate unit. The I. A. M. contends that a separate unit of welders
is inappropriate and that, in any event, the appropriate unit should
be Association-wide in scope. The Company and the Association
contend that whether or not the welders are found to constitute an
appropriate unit, such unit should be Association-wide.
The Company has two plants, referred to as Plant 1 and Plant 2.
At Plant 1 the Company employs 1 full-time welder who does what-
' Matter of Washington Metal Trades, The., 43 N. L R. B. 158.
Y The dismissal was based upon the fact that most of the companies involved had con-
tiacts with several unions covering welders , that the functional delineation of the unit
sought by the Weldors was not sufficiently definite and would ' not eliminate jurisdic-
tional strife ; and that the Weldors , though seeking an Association -wide unit had named
only part of the companies in the Association in its petition
' Discussed in Section IV, below.
The attorney iepoited that the weldors submitted 18 authorization cards bearing
apparently genuine signatures of persons listed on the Company's pay roll of March 5,
1943, which contained the names of 25 employees in the alleged appropriate unit. The
1. A M. relied upon its contract as evidence of its interest in the proceedings
254 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
ever welding work is required in the assembly 'of the machinery pro-
duced by the Company. The welder at Plant 1 works under the super-
vision of the superintendent of both plants. There are 92 employees
at Plant 1, nearly all of whom are machinists and machinists' helpers.
Plant 2, located about a mile away from Plant 1,^ has about 26 em-
ployees. These employees are all welders or burners, with the excep-
tion of a clerk, an assistant superintendent, and 2 machinists and a
machinists' helper, who work in a separate building. The welders and
burners devote their time entirely to welding and burning, under the
immediate supervision of working shift foremen, themselves welders.
Their wages, are comparable to those of other skilled employees.
When the welding requirements at Plant 1 become too great for the
1 welder regularly stationed there, another welder is sent to that plant
from Plant 2. Only on rare occasions do any of the machinists do any
welding. Since the welders constitute a separate and clearly identi-
fiable group of skilled employees, performing specialized functions, we
are of the opinion that a unit of welders and burners may be appro-
priate.-' We shall, however, exclude from any unit which we may find
to be appropriate the working shift, foremen, who are in complete
charge of their shifts and have authority to recommend disciplinary
action and discharge of employees under their supervision.
The remaining issue is whether a unit confined to employees of the
Company can be appropriate or whether the bargaining history is
such that only an Association-wide unit is appropriate. The Associa-
tion'was organized in 1936 and since that time has negotiated annual
bargaining agreements with various A. F. L. affiliates, on behalf of its
members and other companies which have expressly so authorized it.
About the same time a movement began among the welders in the
Seattle area to establish themselves as a separate bargaining group.
As a result in 1936 the A. F. L. Boilermarkers' Union chartered a
separate local of Boilermakers Welders and in 1937 the I. A. M. granted
a charter to Machinists Welders, Local 1351.8 All machinist welders
in Local 79, the I. A. M. local here involved, transferred their affilia-
tion to Local 1351. Thereafter the welders maintained a separate
identity and in some instances entered into separate contracts with
the Association, acting on behalf of its member firms which employed
welders. Toward the end of 1941, however, the A. F. L. rejected the
welders' plea for a separate international welders' union and directed
its affiliates to disestablish their separate welders' locals. The I. A. M.
and its Local 79 directed the welders to reafuliate with Local 79. In-
stead of reaffiliating with the L A. M., the members of Local 1351
° Matter of Taylor Forge cE Pipe Works, 51 N. L. R B. 48: Matter of Track Welding
Company, Inc., 43 N. L. R B. 206; Matter of Dedman Foundry ci Machine Company, 50
N L. R. B. 1019 ; Matter of Solar Aircraft Co., 51 N L. R. B. 964
° See discussion in Matter of Washington Metal Trades , footnote 1, supra.
MARKEY MACHINERY CO., INC. 255
organized an independent welders' union which ultimately became one
local of the Weldors. When the welders broke away from the A. F. L.,
the Association continued to bargain only with the A. F. L. unions,
which proceeded again to include welders within the provisions of their
contracts. Thus the Association, in September 1942, negotiated on
behalf of the Company a contract with the I. A. M. which purported to
cover welders. However, there is no evidence that the welders, follow-
ing the organizational schism, have ever acquiesced in the attempt to
merge them into the various A. F. L. craft units. On the contrary,
the fact that the Weldors petitioned for an election among the Com-
pany's welders in January 1942,' and are still demanding separate
bargaining rights for welders demonstrates a clear refusal to accede to
such a merger. Thus, it appears that there has been no bargaining
in a unit of welders on an Association-wide basis for approximately
2 years. Any bargaining in welders' units on an Association-wide
basis which may once have been carried on ceased too long ago to be
persuasive in the instant proceeding. We find that the welders in
the Company's employ may properly constitute an appropriate unit.
On the other hand, the closely integrated operations of the Company
indicate that the unit including all of the Company's production em-
ployees, for which the I. A. M. contends, might also be appropriate.
We shall, therefore, make no finding at this time as to the appropriate
unit or units, but shall first ascertain the desires of the employees
involved. We shall direct that an election by secret ballot be held
among the welders and burners and their respective helpers employed
by the Company during the pay-roll period immediately preceding
the date of the Direction of Election herein, subject to the limitations
and additions set forth in the Direction, to determine whether they-
desire to be represented by the Weldors, or by the I. A. M., for the
purposes of collective bargaining, or by neither. Upon the results of
such election will depend, in part, our determination of the appro-
priate unit.- If a majority of those participating in the election select
the Weldors, they will have indicated their desire to constitute a
separate bargaining unit. If a majority select the I. A. M., they will
have indicated that they desire to be a part of the unit presently
represented by the I. A. M. and they will be deemed to be a part of
such unit."
The I. A. M. requested that it be designated on the ballot used in the
election as Machinists' Union, Local 79. This request is hereby
granted.
Matter of Washington Metal Trades, Inc, footnote 1, supra.
e The I. A. M. does not seek an ' election in the entire unit which it represents, and
the record is inconclusive as to whether or not that unit is Association -wide. Conse-
quently , we shall make no finding as to the appropriate unit, nor shall we issue a formal
certification , in the event that the I. A M wins the election . See Matter of Armour and
Company , 49 N. L. R. B 195.
256 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
By virtue of and pursuant to the power vested in the National Labor
Relations Board by Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations
Act, and pursuant to Article III, Section 9, of National Labor Rela-
tions Board Rules and Regulations-Series 3, it is hereby
DIRECrE.D that, as part of the investigation to ascertain representa-
tives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Markey Machinery
Co., Inc., an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as
possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this
Direction , under the direction and supervision of the Regional Di-
rcctor for the Nineteenth Region, acting in this matter as agent for
the National Labor Relations Board, and subject to Article III,
Sections '10 and 11, of said Rules and Regulations , among all welders,
burners, and their respective helpers in the employ of Markey Ma-
chinery Co., Inc., Seattle , Washington , excluding the shift foremen
and any other supervisory employees with authority to hire, promote,
dicipline , discharge , or otherwise effect changes in the status of em-
ployees; or effectively recommend such action , who were employed
during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this
Direction , including employees who did not work during said pay-roll
period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, and
including employees in the armed . forces of the United States who
present themselves in person at the polls , but excluding any who have
since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or
reinstated prior to the date of the election , to determine whether they
desire to be represented by United Brotherhood of Weldors , Cutters
and Helpers, of America, Local No. 9, or by Machinists' Union Local
79, International Association of Machinists , affiliated with the Ameri-
can Federation of Labor, for the purposes of collective bargaining,
or by neither.
MR. GERARD D. REIra.Y took no part in the consideration of the above
Decision and Direction of Election.