Mark B. Barta, Complainant,v.Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionAug 17, 2000
01991959 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 17, 2000)

01991959

08-17-2000

Mark B. Barta, Complainant, v. Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.


Mark B. Barta v. Office of Personnel Management

01991959

August 17, 2000

Mark B. Barta, )

Complainant, )

)

v. ) Appeal No. 01991959

) Agency No. 98-33

Janice R. Lachance, )

Director, )

Office of Personnel Management, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

Based on its review of the record, and for the reasons set forth below,

the Commission finds that the agency, in its January 11, 1999 final

decision (FAD), improperly dismissed complainant's complaint for

failure to state a claim.<1> See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to

be codified and hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)).

We accept complainant's January 11, 1999 appeal as timely pursuant to 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)(to be codified at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405).

On July 15, 1998, complainant filed a formal complaint, alleging that

he was the victim of unlawful employment discrimination on the basis of

disability when the agency "entered into health insurance contracts which

did not provide equal benefits for infertility as for other conditions."

Complainant, an employee of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service

(DFAS) since 1993, claimed that he and his wife, an employee of the

U.S. Postal Service, were unable to conceive and that insurance paid less,

if at all, for fertility drugs than for other prescription drugs.

The FAD identified the issue in complainant's complaint as follows:

In your complaint, you alleged that you had been discriminated against by

the United States Office of Personnel Management [OPM] on the basis of

your wife's disability (infertility) because OPM does not require the

health insurance benefit plan in which you are enrolled to cover the

cost of fertility treatments or assisted reproductive technology (ART).

The FAD dismissed complainant's complaint for failure to state a claim.

EEOC regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)) provides, in relevant

part, that an agency shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state

a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any aggrieved

employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she

has been discriminated against by that agency because of race, color,

religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. ��

1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case precedent has

long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm

or loss with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment

for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 21, 1994).

The Commission has entertained several claims concerning the

discriminatory denial of health benefits, raised by the spouse of

the individual seeking treatment. See Heitner v. Office of Personnel

Management, EEOC Request No. 05970035 (July 23, 1998); Polifko v. Office

of Personnel Management, EEOC Request No. 05970769 (January 26, 1998).

In such cases, the Commission has found that the agency responsible for

administering the Federal Employee Health Benefits program is the proper

defendant/agency. See Heitner v. Office of Personnel Management, supra.

The agency administering the Federal Employee Health Benefits program

(OPM) has been found responsible for the insurance carrier's denial of

benefits. See Polifko v. Office of Personnel Management, supra. Further,

whether a complainant is actually disabled is a merits determination,

and is not grounds for dismissal. See Cummings v. Office of Personnel

Management, EEOC Appeal No. 01A00726 (April 21, 2000) (reversing the

agency's dismissal of a complaint alleging the discriminatory denial of

health benefits for infertility treatments).

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the instant complaint for

failure to state a claim was improper and is REVERSED. Complainant's

complaint is REMANDED to the agency for further processing in accordance

with this decision and applicable regulations.

ORDER (E0400)

The agency is ORDERED to process the remanded claims in accordance with

64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656-7 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.108). The agency shall acknowledge to

the complainant that it has received the remanded claims within thirty

(30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency

shall issue to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall

notify complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty

(150) calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the

matter is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant

requests a final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue

a final decision within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's

request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K1199)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to the

complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's order,

the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of the order.

29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right to file a

civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order prior

to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659-60 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408), and 29 C.F.R. �

1614.503(g). Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a

civil action on the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph

below entitled "Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407

and 1614.408. A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the

underlying complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. �

2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409).

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0300)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED

WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR

DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF

RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64

Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred

to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management

Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).

All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must

also include proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0400)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the

date you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with

the Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE

DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME

AND OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

Filing a civil action will terminate the administrative processing of

your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

August 17, 2000

_______________ ________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.