Marie L. Wilson, Complainant,v.Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 27, 2006
05A61062 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 27, 2006)

05A61062

09-27-2006

Marie L. Wilson, Complainant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Marie L. Wilson,

Complainant,

v.

Jo Anne B. Barnhart,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Request No. 05A61062

Appeal No. 01A61316

Hearing No. 160-2005-00370X

Agency No. 04-0064-SSA1

DENIAL

The agency timely requested reconsideration of the decision in Marie

L. Wilson v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01A61316

(August 7, 2006). EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, grant a request to reconsider any previous Commission

decision where the requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate

decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact

or law; or (2) the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on

the policies, practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. �

1614.405(b).

In requesting reconsideration, the agency contends that our previous

decision erred in awarding complainant $5,000.00 in non-pecuniary

compensatory damages because similar cases only awarded complainants

$500.00 to $1,000.00 in non-pecuniary compensatory damages and some of

complainant's mental anguish pre-existed the agency's discriminatory

actions. However, upon review, we find that the record supports the

conclusion that complainant's mental anguish was caused by the agency's

discriminatory actions. We further determine that the award of $5,000.00

in non-pecuniary compensatory damages was appropriate and supported

by substantial evidence. See Vitale v. Social Security Administration,

EEOC Appeal No. 01A4440 (February 7, 2005) ($5,000.00 in non-pecuniary

damages awarded where complainant suffered from severe emotional

distress, humiliation, hurt feelings, anxiety and mental suffering after

the agency's failure to provide reasonable accommodation); see also

Benson v. Department of Agriculture, EEOC Appeal No. 01952854 (June 27,

1996)($5,000.00.00 in non-pecuniary damages where complainant experienced

stress, skin rashes, withdrawal, and isolation); Tula v. Department

of the Navy, EEOC Appeal No. 01A13645 (August 30, 2002) ($5,000.00

based on complainant's testimony that she experienced depression,

anxiety attacks, withdrawal and humiliation); Spencer v. Department

of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal 07A10035 (May 6, 2003) ($5,000.00 awarded

for complainant's dejection, stress and emotional pain). This amount

meets the goals of not being motivated by bias or prejudice, not being

"monstrously excessive" standing alone, and being consistent with the

amounts awarded in similar cases.

Therefore, after reconsidering the previous decision and the entire

record, the Commission finds that the request fails to meet the criteria

of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is the decision of the Commission to

deny the request. The decision in EEOC Appeal No. 01A61316 remains the

Commission's final decision. There is no further right of administrative

appeal on the decision of the Commission on this request.

ORDER

Therefore, as set forth in the previous decision, to the extent that

it has not already done so, the agency is ORDERED to take the following

remedial action:

1. To pay to complainant the sum of $5,000.00 in compensatory

damages;

2. To pay to complainant the sum of $9.65 in costs;

3. To pay to complainant $385.00, plus interest to December

7, 2005;

4. To take corrective, curative and preventive action to ensure that

retaliation does not recur. This includes, but is not limited to,

20 hours of training for the relevant management officials, regarding

their responsibilities with respect to eliminating discrimination in the

federal workplace. The training must emphasize the agency's obligations

under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq., and in particular, the law against retaliation;

and

5. To consider taking appropriate disciplinary action against the

responsible management officials. The Commission does not consider

training to be disciplinary action. The agency shall report its decision

to the compliance officer. If the agency decides to take disciplinary

action, it shall identify the action taken. If the agency decides

not to take disciplinary action, it shall set forth the reason(s)

for its decision not to impose discipline. If any of the responsible

management officials have left the agency's employ, the agency shall

furnish documentation of their departure date(s). .

POSTING ORDER

The agency is ordered to post at its Roslindale, Massachusetts field

office, copies of the attached notice. Copies of the notice, after

being signed by the agency's duly authorized representative, shall

be posted by the agency within thirty (30) calendar days of the date

this decision becomes final, and shall remain posted for sixty (60)

consecutive days, in conspicuous places, including all places where

notices to employees are customarily posted. The agency shall take

reasonable steps to ensure that said notices are not altered, defaced,

or covered by any other material. The original signed notice is to be

submitted to the Compliance Officer at the address cited in the paragraph

entitled "Implementation of the Commission's Decision," within ten (10)

calendar days of the expiration of the posting period.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further

right of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You

have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File a Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

_September 27, 2006____________

Date

1 We note that complainant's complaint is also alternatively identified

in the record as Agency No. 03-0160-SSA and Hearing No. 160-2004-00062X.

??

??

??

??

2

05A61062

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P. O. Box 19848

Washington, D.C. 20036

4

05A61062

5

05A61062