Maria L. Guerra, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 20, 2000
05a01251 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 20, 2000)

05a01251

12-20-2000

Maria L. Guerra, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southeast Area), Agency.


Maria L. Guerra v. United States Postal Service

05A01251

December 20, 2000

.

Maria L. Guerra,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southeast Area),

Agency.

Request No. 05A01251

Appeal No. 01982149

Agency No. 1-G-771-1101-94

Hearing No.

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

The complainant initiated a request to the Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in Maria

L. Guerra v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01982149

(July 19, 2000).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that the

request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b), and it is

the decision of the Commission to deny the request. While complainant

continues to point to the behavior of the harasser, we again note that

non-pecuniary compensatory damages are designed to remedy a harm and

not to punish the agency for its discriminatory actions. See Memphis

Community School Dist. v. Stachura, 477 U.S. 299, 311-12 (1986) (stating

that compensatory damages determinations must be based on the actual

harm sustained and not the facts of the underlying case). The amount of

the award is dependent on the evidence submitted explaining the nature,

severity and duration of the harm. In this case, the medical evidence is

vague as to the nature, severity and duration of complainant's injuries.

As a result, complainant has not sufficiently documented her entitlement

to a greater non-pecuniary award. Therefore, the decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01982149 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 20, 2000

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.