04A10058
12-04-2001
Maria D. Jones, Complainant, v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.
Maria D. Jones v. Department of Veterans Affairs
04A10058
December 4, 2001
.
Maria D. Jones,
Complainant,
v.
Anthony J. Principi,
Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Agency.
Appeal No. 04A10058
Agency No. 972170
DISMISSAL OF PETITION
Complainant filed a petition for enforcement with this Commission,
based on the agency's alleged failure to abide by an ORDER issued by
this Commission in Jones v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal
No. 01994717 (November 2, 2000), request for reconsideration denied,
Request No. 05A10136 (April 16, 2001). Specifically, complainant alleged,
on August 24, 2001, that the agency failed to award an appropriate amount
of back pay.
On July 13, 2001, complainant filed a civil action (identified as Civil
Action No. 1:01CV291BrR) in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Mississippi, Southern Division. The record further
discloses that the claims raised therein are the same as those raised
in EEOC Appeal No. 01994717 and that, as relief, complainant requested
compensatory damages, back pay and punitive damages. The regulation found
at 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that the filing of a civil action "shall
terminate Commission processing of the appeal." Commission regulations
mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these circumstances so as to
prevent a complainant from simultaneously pursuing both administrative and
judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating
the potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order
to grant due deference to the authority of the federal district court.
See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079
(May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513
(October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October
25, 1988). Accordingly, complainant's petition for enforcement is
hereby dismissed. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.<1> The dismissal of the
petition will not preclude enforcement of our November 2, 2000 decision
by the court in which the civil action has been filed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
December 4, 2001
Date
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days after it was mailed. I certify
that this decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
__________________
Date
______________________________
1 Moreover, we note that on October 6, 2001, complainant withdrew her
petition for enforcement on the issue of back pay, stating that the back
pay award was no longer in dispute.