Marcelino Delgado, Appellant,v.Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSep 20, 1999
01983932 (E.E.O.C. Sep. 20, 1999)

01983932

09-20-1999

Marcelino Delgado, Appellant, v. Daniel R. Glickman, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.


Marcelino Delgado v. Department of Agriculture

01983932

September 20, 1999

Marcelino Delgado, )

Appellant, )

) Appeal No. 01983932

v. )

) Agency No. 930114

Daniel R. Glickman, )

Secretary, )

Department of Agriculture, )

Agency. )

)

DECISION

Appellant filed this appeal with the Commission on April 22, 1998 alleging

that the agency breached the first and third provisions of a settlement

agreement entered into on October 20, 1994. The agreement provides,

in relevant part, that:

(1) The Agency agrees to expunge all negative documentation from Agency

files surrounding [appellant's] termination of July 13, 1992, and amend

Agency personnel records to indicate that [appellant] voluntarily resigned

on July 13, 1992.

(3) The Agency agrees to compensate [appellant] the sum of ten thousand

dollars ($10,000).

The file contains several documents from the agency indicating that,

while it was not in compliance when appellant filed her complaint, it has

subsequently cured any breach. The Commission deems these documents to

constitute a decision finding that the agency is no longer in breach of

the agreement. Of the documents submitted, there is clear evidence that

provisions (1) and (3) have been satisfied. With regard to provision

(3), the agency submitted evidence which illustrates that, due to the

fact that it took four years to comply, appellant was paid a total sum

of $12,593.91, which reflects four years of interest accrued on the

initial $10,000. The agency noted that the additional $2,593.91 was a

Prompt Pay late penalty calculated from the published Treasury Prompt

Pay rates for the period of October 1994 (the date the settlement was

reached) through September 1998 (the date the agency reached compliance).

Because the agency is now in compliance and, in addition, has assessed

itself a penalty for the four year delay, we hold that the agreement is

no longer in breach.

Accordingly, the decision of the agency was proper and is, therefore,

AFFIRMED

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0795)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the appellant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. New and material evidence is available that was not readily available

when the previous decision was issued; or

2. The previous decision involved an erroneous interpretation of law,

regulation or material fact, or misapplication of established policy; or

3. The decision is of such exceptional nature as to have substantial

precedential implications.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting arguments or evidence, MUST

BE FILED WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive this

decision, or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive

a timely request to reconsider filed by another party. Any argument in

opposition to the request to reconsider or cross request to reconsider

MUST be submitted to the Commission and to the requesting party

WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS of the date you receive the request

to reconsider. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.407. All requests and arguments

must bear proof of postmark and be submitted to the Director, Office of

Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box

19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark,

the request to reconsider shall be deemed filed on the date it is received

by the Commission.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely. If extenuating circumstances

have prevented the timely filing of a request for reconsideration,

a written statement setting forth the circumstances which caused the

delay and any supporting documentation must be submitted with your

request for reconsideration. The Commission will consider requests

for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very limited

circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0993)

It is the position of the Commission that you have the right to file

a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court WITHIN

NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision.

You should be aware, however, that courts in some jurisdictions have

interpreted the Civil Rights Act of 1991 in a manner suggesting that

a civil action must be filed WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR DAYS from the

date that you receive this decision. To ensure that your civil action

is considered timely, you are advised to file it WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you receive this decision or to consult

an attorney concerning the applicable time period in the jurisdiction

in which your action would be filed. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action AFTER ONE HUNDRED AND EIGHTY (180) CALENDAR DAYS of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS THE DEFENDANT

IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD OR DEPARTMENT

HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND OFFICIAL TITLE.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1092)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. �2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. ��791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

Sept. 20, 1999

____________________________________

DATE Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations