Luanna Fuentes-Ruiz, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJan 18, 2006
01a54947 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 18, 2006)

01a54947

01-18-2006

Luanna Fuentes-Ruiz, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, (Southwest Area), Agency.


Luanna Fuentes-Ruiz v. United States Postal Service

01A54947

January 18, 2006

.

Luanna Fuentes-Ruiz,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

(Southwest Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A54947

Agency No. 4G-870-0055-05

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the final

agency decision dated June 8, 2005, dismissing her formal EEO complaint,

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2), for untimely EEO Counselor

contact. In her complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected

to discrimination on the bases of her disability and in retaliation for

prior EEO activity in violation of Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act

of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. � 791 et seq. when

in January 2005, she discovered through a routine inquiry into social

security benefits that she had been terminated from her employment with

the agency.

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. �1614.105(a)(1) requires that complaints of

discrimination should be brought to the attention of the Equal Employment

Opportunity Counselor within forty-five (45) days of the date of the

matter alleged to be discriminatory or, in the case of a personnel

action, within forty-five (45) days of the effective date of the action.

Upon review of the record, we find that complainant did not specify an

exact date in January 2005 upon which she alleges to have discovered

that she was terminated. In its final decision, the agency states that

assuming the date that the alleged discriminatory event occurred was

January 1, 2005, complainant's March 2, 2005 EEO Counselor contact is

beyond the forty-five (45) day limitation period.

It is well-settled that where, as here, there is an issue of timeliness,

"[a]n agency always bears the burden of obtaining sufficient information

to support a reasoned determination as to timeliness." Williams

v. Department of Defense, EEOC Request No. 05920506 (August 25, 1992).

We find, however, that the record contains insufficient information to

determine whether complainant's March 2, 2005, counselor contact was

timely. Specifically, the record does not identify the exact date in

January 2005, upon which complainant alleges to have made the inquiry

into her social security benefits which led to the discovery of her

termination. Further, despite the agency's contention that complainant

was issued a Notice of Personnel Action indicating that complainant

would be separated from employment on November 27, 2004, we find that

the record does not contain a copy of this notice and is also devoid of

any evidence showing that such a notice was ever received by complainant.

Accordingly, the agency's decision to dismiss the complaint for untimely

EEO Counselor contact is vacated, and the complaint is remanded to the

agency for further processing in accordance with this decision and the

order below.

ORDER

The agency is ordered to take the following actions:

Within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall undertake a supplemental investigation (a) to

determine the exact date in January 2005 upon which complainant made

the inquiry into her social security benefits, and (b) to uncover any

evidence to support the agency's contention that complainant was issued,

and received, a notice of separation in November 2004. The agency shall

supplement the record with any relevant documentation obtained as a result

of its investigation, specifically including affidavits from complainant,

complainant's relevant supervisors, and any other relevant EEO and Human

Resources personnel, and a copy of the Notice of Removal.

2. Within thirty (30) calendar days of the date this decision becomes

final, the agency shall issue a notice of processing and/or a new

decision.

A copy of the agency's notice of processing and/or new decision must be

sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0501)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement

of the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the

right to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's

order prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement.

See 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g).

Alternatively, the complainant has the right to file a civil action on

the underlying complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled

"Right to File A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408.

A civil action for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying

complaint is subject to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. 2000e-16(c)

(1994 & Supp. IV 1999). If the complainant files a civil action, the

administrative processing of the complaint, including any petition for

enforcement, will be terminated. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION

(R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

January 18, 2006

__________________

Date