Louis Leibowitz, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 27, 2001
o1a00552 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 27, 2001)

o1a00552

02-27-2001

Louis Leibowitz, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (New York Metro Area), Agency.


Louis Leibowitz v. United States Postal Service

01A00552

February 27, 2001

.

Louis Leibowitz,

Complainant,

v.

William J. Henderson,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service

(New York Metro Area),

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A00552

Agency No. 4-A-105-0080-98

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency's

decision dated July 17, 1998, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In his

complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to discrimination

on the bases of his religion (Jewish), and reprisal (prior EEO activity)

when, on March 31, 1998, he was told that in the future he would not be

scheduled to work.<1>

The agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to EEOC Regulation 29

C.F.R. � 1614.107 (a)(1), for stating the same claim that had been

previously decided by the agency. Specifically, the agency determined

that complainant raised the same issue in a prior complaint. See

Leibowitz v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 01985688

(November 17, 1999). The agency argued that in his prior complaint,

complainant requested that he be returned to the route he previously

worked and that in the instant complaint, he was alleging that he was

denied placement on future work schedules. The agency noted that these

allegations were like or related, in that both involved complainant's

claim that he was denied �TRC duties.� <3>

EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107 (a) (1) provides that the agency

shall dismiss a complaint or a portion of a complaint that states the

same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency

or Commission. It has long been established that "identical" does not

mean "similar." The Commission has consistently held that in order for

a complaint to be dismissed as identical, the elements of the complaint

must be identical to the elements of the prior complaint in time, place,

incident, and parties. See Jackson v. Department of the Air Force,

EEOC Appeal No 01955890 (April 5, 1996) rev'd on other grounds EEOC

Request No. 05960524 (April 24, 1997).

In the present case, the record reflects that complainant alleged that

on March 31, 1998, he was informed by the Officer in Charge (OIC)

that he would not be scheduled to work a route in the Woodbourne

Post Office. Complainant alleged that OIC based her decision on his

religion and the fact that he filed a prior complaint against the

former Postmaster. The record reflects that complainant previously

raised similar claims that the former Postmaster did not schedule him

to work. However, the dates and the parties cited by complainant in

his prior complaint are not the same as those he cites in the case

at hand. Therefore, the matter raised in the instant complaint is not

identical to the claims raised in the prior complaint.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint was not proper and the decision is REVERSED. The complaint

is hereby REMANDED for further processing in accordance with the Order

below.

ORDER (E0900)

The agency is ordered to process the remanded claims in accordance with

29 C.F.R. � 1614.108. The agency shall acknowledge to the complainant

that it has received the remanded claims within thirty (30) calendar

days of the date this decision becomes final. The agency shall issue

to complainant a copy of the investigative file and also shall notify

complainant of the appropriate rights within one hundred fifty (150)

calendar days of the date this decision becomes final, unless the matter

is otherwise resolved prior to that time. If the complainant requests a

final decision without a hearing, the agency shall issue a final decision

within sixty (60) days of receipt of complainant's request.

A copy of the agency's letter of acknowledgment to complainant and a

copy of the notice that transmits the investigative file and notice of

rights must be sent to the Compliance Officer as referenced below.

IMPLEMENTATION OF THE COMMISSION'S DECISION (K0900)

Compliance with the Commission's corrective action is mandatory.

The agency shall submit its compliance report within thirty (30)

calendar days of the completion of all ordered corrective action. The

report shall be submitted to the Compliance Officer, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. The agency's report must contain supporting

documentation, and the agency must send a copy of all submissions to

the complainant. If the agency does not comply with the Commission's

order, the complainant may petition the Commission for enforcement of

the order. 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(a). The complainant also has the right

to file a civil action to enforce compliance with the Commission's order

prior to or following an administrative petition for enforcement. See 29

C.F.R. �� 1614.407, 1614.408, and 29 C.F.R. � 1614.503(g). Alternatively,

the complainant has the right to file a civil action on the underlying

complaint in accordance with the paragraph below entitled "Right to File

A Civil Action." 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.407 and 1614.408. A civil action

for enforcement or a civil action on the underlying complaint is subject

to the deadline stated in 42 U.S.C. � 2000e-16(c)(Supp. V 1993). If the

complainant files a civil action, the administrative processing of the

complaint, including any petition for enforcement, will be terminated.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0900)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the office of federal operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (R0900)

This is a decision requiring the agency to continue its administrative

processing of your complaint. However, if you wish to file a civil

action, you have the right to file such action in an appropriate United

States District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date

that you receive this decision. In the alternative, you may file a

civil action after one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days of the date

you filed your complaint with the agency, or filed your appeal with the

Commission. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant in

the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work. Filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

February 27, 2001

_______________________

Date

1Complainant referred to this as �future scheduling� in his complaint.

3This term is not defined in the record.