0120063682
10-26-2006
Lori K. Carlson, Complainant, v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General, Department of Justice (BoP), Agency.
Lori K. Carlson v. Department of Justice (BoP)
0120063682
10-26-06
.
Lori K. Carlson,
Complainant,
v.
Alberto Gonzales,
Attorney General,
Department of Justice (BoP),
Agency.
Appeal No. 0120063682<1>
Agency No. P 20060172
DISMISSAL
By letter dated May 23, 2006, Lori K. Carlson (complainant) was notified
that her complaint would be held in abeyance pending resolution
of the class complaint in Turner, et al. v. Department of Justice.
The Administrative Judge (AJ) defined the class to include agency
employees who were subjected to retaliation. Because complainant's
complaint claimed retaliation as a basis, her complaint must be held in
abeyance pursuant to EEOC regulations.<2> See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.204(e);
EEOC Management Directive 110 (November 9, 1999) Chapter 8, Section
III(C). Specifically, MD-110 states:
An individual complaint that is filed before or after the class complaint
is filed and that comes within the definition of the class claim(s)
will not be dismissed but will be subsumed within the class complaint.
Page 8-4.
Further, according to the agency's letter, the AJ has ordered the agency
to take action in accordance with the above provisions by notifying
all complainants of his Order and inclusion in the class complaint.
For these reasons, the Commission must defer to the AJ's processing of
the class complaint. Accordingly, complaint's appeal is dismissed.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0701)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed
with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar
days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of
receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29
C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for
29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests
and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal
Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,
Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include
proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as
the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head
or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and
official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
______________________________
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations
__10-26-06________________
Date
1Due to a new data system, your case has been redesignated with the
above-referenced appeal number.
2We note that if complainant's allegation of harassment is based on her
claim of reprisal, and not based on sex, her harassment allegation is
included within the definition of the class.