Local 375, Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters, Etc.

National Labor Relations Board - Board Decisions

May 4, 1964

146 N.L.R.B. 1319 (N.L.R.B. 1964)

LOCAL 375, INT'L BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS, ETC. 1319
department , service-salesmen , cashier , service file clerk ; excluding service
clerk , owner-relations coordinator , all new and used automobile and truck
salesmen , office clerical employees , guards, professional employees, and
supervisors as defined in the Act.
WE WILL furnish the Union , on request , any wage data not previously supplied
it; we will also give the Union a copy of the employee handbook and the in-
surance booklet , if the Union does not have up-to -date copies; and we will
supply the Union with information concerning the cost both to the employees
and to the Company of the insurance plan currently in effect.
RHODES-HOLLAND CHEVROLET CO.,
Employer.
Dated------------------- By-------------------------------------------
(Representative ) (Title)
This notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date of posting,
and must not be altered , defaced , or covered by any other material.
Employees may communicate directly with the Board 's Regional Office, Transit
Building, Fourth and Vine Streets , Cincinnati , Ohio, Telephone No. 381-1420, if
they have any question concerning this notice or compliance with its provisions.
Local 375, International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America , Ind. and Glenn Cart-
age Company .
Local 375, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America , Ind. and Service
Transport, Inc.
Local 375, International Brotherhood of Teamsters , Chauffeurs,
Warehousemen and Helpers of America , Ind. and The Kaplan
Trucking Co. Cases Nos. 3-CC-252, 3-CC-253, 3-CC-256. May
4, 1964
DECISION AND ORDER
On January 21, 1964, Trial Examiner William Seagle issued his
Decision in the above-entitled proceeding, finding that the Respondent
had not engaged in the alleged unfair labor practices and recommend-
ing that the complaint herein be dismissed in its entirety, as set forth
in the attached Trial Examiner's Decision. Thereafter, the Charging
Parties filed exceptions to .the Trial Examiner's Decision and a sup-
porting brief.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the National Labor
Rel