Linda Wilson, Complainant,v.Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDec 14, 2000
05980330 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 14, 2000)

05980330

12-14-2000

Linda Wilson, Complainant, v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, Agency.


Linda Wilson v. Social Security Administration

05980330

December 14, 2000

.

Linda Wilson,

Complainant,

v.

Kenneth S. Apfel,

Commissioner,

Social Security Administration,

Agency.

Request No. 05980330

Appeal No. 01956904

Agency No. 40297

Hearing No. 280944380X

DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

Linda Wilson (complainant) initiated a request to the Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) to reconsider the decision in

Linda Wilson v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 01956904

(January 5, 1998).<1> EEOC Regulations provide that the Commission may,

in its discretion, reconsider any previous Commission decision where the

requesting party demonstrates that: (1) the appellate decision involved

a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact or law; or (2)

the appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

After a review of the complainant's request for reconsideration, the

previous decision, and the entire record, the Commission finds that

the request fails to meet the criteria of 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405(b).

While the previous decision incorrectly determined that complainant's

appeal brief was untimely, this error did not effect the outcome of

the decision. Based on the record before her at the time, including

complainant's response to the agency's Motion for Summary Judgment,

the Administrative Judge determined that complainant could not

perform one of the essential functions of her position, specifically,

�Spike� duties. Although complainant raised new arguments on appeal in

attempting to rebut the Administrative Judge's (AJ) determination that

�Spike� duties are an essential function of the position in question,

complainant failed to raise these arguments before the AJ, despite

the opportunity she was given to do so. Accordingly, after a careful

review of the record in its entirety, the Commission finds that the

previous decision correctly affirmed the agency's final decision of

no discrimination and it is the decision of the Commission to deny

complainant's request for reconsideration. The decision in EEOC Appeal

No. 01956904 remains the Commission's final decision. There is no further

right of administrative appeal on the decision of the Commission on this

request for reconsideration.

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (P0900)

This decision of the Commission is final, and there is no further right

of administrative appeal from the Commission's decision. You have the

right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District

Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive

this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the defendant

in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or department

head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title.

Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case in court.

"Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and not the

local office, facility or department in which you work.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

December 14, 2000

__________________

Date

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply

to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the

administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply

the revised regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.