01a02745
08-01-2000
Linda Menifee v. Department of Veterans Affairs
01A02745
August 1, 2000
.
Linda Menifee,
Complainant,
v.
Togo D. West, Jr.,
Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs,
Agency.
Appeal No. 01A02745
Agency No. 99-2776
DECISION
Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from an agency's
decision dated September 24, 1999, dismissing her complaint of unlawful
employment discrimination.<1> In her complaint, complainant alleged that
she was subjected to discrimination when:
From January, 1999, and on complainant was subjected to harassment; and
From January, 1999, and on management interfered with complainant's time
and attendance.
The agency dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to the regulation
set forth at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and
hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)), for failure
to state a claim. Specifically, the agency claimed that complainant
failed to identify a basis of discrimination. In addition, the agency
dismissed complainant's complaint pursuant to the regulation set forth
at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(7)), for failure to cooperate.
The agency stated that on July 29, 1999, it sent complainant a request
to identify the basis of her complaint and informed her that failure to
respond within 15 calendar days of her receipt of the request could result
in dismissal of her complaint. The agency stated that complainant failed
to respond and therefore claimed that her complaint should be dismissed
for failure to cooperate.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.103(a) provides that individual and class
complaints of employment discrimination and retaliation prohibited by
Title VII (discrimination on the bases of race, color, religion, sex and
national origin), the ADEA (discrimination on the basis of age when the
aggrieved individual is at least forty years of age), the Rehabilitation
Act (discrimination on the basis of disability), or the Equal Pay Act
(sex-based wage discrimination) shall be processed under EEO Regulations.
EEOC Regulation 29 C.F.R. � 1614.101(b) provides that no person shall be
subject to retaliation for opposing any practice made unlawful by Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act (Title VII) (42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.),
the Equal Pay Act (29 U.S.C. � 206(d)) or the Rehabilitation Act (29
U.S.C. � 791 et seq.) or for participating in any stage of administrative
or judicial proceedings under these statutes.
EEOC Regulations require the dismissal of complaints that fail to state
a claim. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and
hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1)). An agency shall accept
a complaint from any aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who
believes that he or she has been discriminated against by that agency
because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disabling
condition. 29 C.F.R. �� 1614.103, . 106(a). The Commission's federal
sector case precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one
who suffers a present harm or loss with respect to a term, condition, or
privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz v. Department
of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (April 22, 1994).
The Commission's authority to address complaints only extends to those
brought under the statutes listed above. We note that complainant had
numerous attempts to identify a basis of discrimination - in counseling,
in her formal complaint, and in response to the request for information -
but failed to do so. Thus, we find that her complaint should be dismissed
for failure to state a claim.
Accordingly, the agency's decision dismissing complainant's complaint
is AFFIRMED.
STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0300)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this
case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing
arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation
of material fact or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,
practices, or operations of the agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE FILED
WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30) CALENDAR
DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR DAYS OF
RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION. See 64
Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter referred
to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.405); Equal Employment Opportunity Management
Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999).
All requests and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of
Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box
19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the
request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by
mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.
See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter
referred to as 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604). The request or opposition must
also include proof of service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your
request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances
prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation
must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission
will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only
in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).
COMPLAINANTS' RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0400)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States
District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you
receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS
THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD
OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND
OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your
case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,
and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil
action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.
RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)
If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot
afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint
an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the
action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII
of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).
The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of
the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time
in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action
must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above
("Right to File A Civil Action").
FOR THE COMMISSION:
August 1, 2000
____________________________
Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director
Office of Federal Operations
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision
was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that
the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative
(if applicable), and the agency on:
_______________ __________________________
Date 1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's
federal sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations
apply to all federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in
the administrative process. Consequently, the Commission will apply
the revised regulations found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where
applicable, in deciding the present appeal. The regulations, as amended,
may also be found at the Commission's website at www.eeoc.gov.