Lewiston Buick Co.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsApr 27, 194877 N.L.R.B. 375 (N.L.R.B. 1948) Copy Citation In the Matter of LEwISTON BUiCK COMPANY, EMPLOYER and INTER- NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS, PETITIONER Case No. 1-RC-4.-Decided April 27, 1948 Skelton ce Mahon, by Mr. John J. Mahon, of Lewiston, Maine, for the Employer. 111r. Harold F. Reardon, of Boston, Mass., and Mr. Jerome Y. Sturm, of New York City, for the Petitioner. DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION Upon a petition duly filed, hearing in this case was held at Lewiston, Maine, on January 8, 1948, before Thomas J. Ramsey, hearing officer. The hearing officer's-rulings made at the hearing are free from preju- dicial error and are hereby affirmed. Upon the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board 1 makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT I. THE BUSINESS OF THE EMPLOYER Lewiston Buick Company, a Maine corporation, with its principal office and place of business at Lewiston, Maine, and with branches at Augusta and Bath, Maine, operates retail sales and service agencies for Buick automobiles under a franchise from the Buick Motor Divi- sion of General Motors Corporation, Flint, Michigan, as well as serv- ice stations for the repair and reconditioning of automobiles. During 1946, a representative period, the Employer purchased new automo- biles and parts in the aggregate value of $191,000, all of which were received from points outside the State of Maine, and used cars in the aggregate value of $42,300, all of which were purchased within the State as trade-ins. During the same period, the Employer sold new 'Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3 (b) of the Act , the Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three -man panel consisting of the undersigned Board .Members [ Chairman Herzog and Members Murdock and Gray] 77 N. L. R. B., No 58. 375 376 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD and used cars in the aggregate value of $271,000, virtually all of which were sold to customers within the State. This proceeding is concerned only with the Employer's Lewiston agency, which does 50 percent of the Employer's business. The Employer contributes to a national advertising fund administered by the Buick Motor Division and belongs to the National Automobile Dealers Association. We find, contrary to its contention, that the Employer is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act.2 II. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED The Petitioner is a labor organization claiming to represent em- ployees of the Employer. M. TILE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION The Employer refuses to recognize the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the Employer until the Petitioner has been certified by the Board in all appropriate unit. We find that a question affecting commerce exists concerning the representation of employees of the Employer,, within the meaning of Section 9 (c) (1) and Section 2 (6) and (7) of the Act. IV. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT The Petitioner and Employer agree that a unit of all employees in the Employer's service department at Lewiston, Maine, engagecl in the maintaining, servicing, and repairing of automobiles, except for executives, office and clerical employees, and all guards, profes- sional employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act, is appro- priate. They disagree, however, with respect to an employee hired under the G. I. training program. The Employer contends that Rosaire Gagnon, the G. I. trainee, should be excluded from the unit because he has not completed his 2-year training period 3 and because the question of his permanent and regular employment will be decided by the Employer only at the conclusion of the training pediod. The Petitioner requests that Gagnon be included. As Gagnon is employed under the same con- ditions as, and has substantial interests in common with, the other employees, and as he is, in effect, a probationary employee with a reasonable expectation of becoming a permanent employee, we shall, in accordance with our practice, include him in the unit .4 2 Matter of Liddon White Truck Co , 76 N. L R B 1181. 8 Rosaire Gagnon has been employed for a little over a year 4 Matter of West Engineering Company, 74 N L. R B 36. LEWISTON BUICK COMPANY 377 We find that all employees in the Employer's service department at Lewiston, Maine, engaged in the maintaining, servicing, and repair- ing of automobiles, including G. I. trainees,5 but excluding executives, office and clerical employees, and all guards, professional employees, and supervisors as defined in the Act, constitute a unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of Sec- tion 9 (b) of the Act. DIRECTION OF ELECTION As part of the investigation to ascertain representatives for the purposes of collective bargaining with Lewiston Buick Company, Lewiston, Maine, an election by secret ballot shall be conducted as early as possible, but not later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Direction, under the direction and supervision of the Regional Director for the First Region, and subject to Sections 203.61 and 203.62 of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 5, among the employees in the unit found appropriate in Section IV, above, who were employed during the pay-roll period immediately preceding the date of this Direction, including employees who did not work during said pay-roll period because they were ill or on vacation or temporarily laid off, but excluding those employees who have since quit or been discharged for cause and have not been rehired or re- instated prior to the date of the election, and also excluding employees on strike who are not entitled to reinstatement, to determine whether or not they desire to be represented by International Association of Machinists for the purposes of collective bargaining. 6 Rosaire Gagnon. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation