Lenkurt Electric Co., Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsJun 22, 1971191 N.L.R.B. 427 (N.L.R.B. 1971) Copy Citation LENKURT ELECTRIC CO., INC. 427 Lenkurt Electric Company, Inc. and San Francisco & Vicinity Printing Pressmen, Offset Workers & As- sistants' Union No. 24, International Printing Press- men and Assistants ' Union of North America, AFL-- CIO Lenkurt Electric Company, Inc. and San Francisco & Vicinity Printing Pressmen , Offset Workers & As- sistants' Union No. 24, International Printing Press- men and Assistants ' Union of North America, AFL- CIO, Petitioner . Cases 20-CA-4284 and 20-RC- 7154 June 22, 1971 SUPPLEMENTAL DECISION, ORDER, AND CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION BY MEMBERS FANNING, BROWN, AND KENNEDY The Board on February 19, 1968,1 issued its Decision and Order finding that the Respondent had engaged in certain unfair labor practices as alleged in the com- plaint in Case 20-CA-4284 and that such conduct in- terfered with the election in Case 20-RC-7154. The Board further stated therein, that in view of the 8(a)(1) violations found and its decision to set the election aside and direct a second one on that basis, it was unnecessary to pass on the Union's further objections to the election. Thereafter, on February 10, 1971, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused to grant enforcement of the Board's Order of February 19, 1968, finding that' the Respondent's statements on which the Board's 8(a)(1) findings were based were predictions protected by Section, 8(c) of the Act, rather than threats proscribed by Section 8(a)(1) of the Act and constituted proper campaign propaganda. Thus, in view of the court's holding, the Board deems it appro- priate to consider the Union's further objections in Case 20-RC-7154. Those further objections were grounded on two letters the Respondent had sent its employees during the election campaign2 which the Trial Examiner concluded contained permissible cam- paign propaganda. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the Na- tional Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three-member panel. The Board has considered, insofar as they relate to the further objections, the Trial Examiner's Report on Objections, the Charging Party's exceptions and brief, and the entire record in this case. Upon such considera- tion we conclude that the Charging Party's exceptions to the Trial Examiner's recommendation that these ob- jections he overruled are without merit. Accordingly, we shall vacate the Direction of Second Election in the Board's Order dated February 19, 1968, and certify the results of the election held in Case 20- RC-7154. ORDER It is hereby ordered that the Direction of Second Election of February 19, 1968, be, and it hereby is, vacated. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION It is hereby certified that a majority of the valid ballots has not been cast for San Francisco & Vicinity Printing Pressmen, Offset Workers & Assistants' Union No. 24, International Printing Pressmen and Assistants' Union of North America, AFL-CIO, in Case 20-RC-7154, and that the said organization is not the exclusive representative of the employees in the unit herein involved, within the meaning of Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. ' 169 NLRB 941 2 Supra at 962, 963. 191 NLRB No. 100 Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation