Lengsfield Brothers, Inc.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsFeb 6, 194238 N.L.R.B. 951 (N.L.R.B. 1942) Copy Citation In the Matter of LENGSFIELD BROTHERS , INC. and FOLDING Box WORKERS UNION, No. 500, INTERNATIONAL PRINTING PRESSMEN AND ASSISTANTS UNION OF NORTH AMERICA, AFFILIATED WITH THE AMER- ICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR Case No. R-3401.Decided February 6, 1942 Jurisdiction : paper box manufacturing industry. Practice and Procedure : petition dismissed where no appropriate unit within the scope of the petition ; unit composed of employees in certain alleged de- partments of the Company found inappropriate where there are no such identifiable departments, and where the functions of all employees in the plant are closely interrelated. Mr. Samuel Lang, of New Orleans, La., for the Company. Mr. Louis P. Sahuque and Mr. TV. C. Marrero, of New Orleans, La., for the Union. Miss Mary E. Perkins, of counsel to the Board. DECISION AND ORDER STATEMENT OF THE CASE On November 3, 1941 , Folding Box Workers Union, No. 500, In- ternational Printing Pressmen and Assistants Union of North Amer- ica, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, herein called the Union, filed with the Regional Director for the Fifteenth Region (New Orleans , Louisiana ) a petition alleging that a question affecting commerce had arisen concerning the representation of employees of Lengsfield Brothers, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana , herein called the Company , and requesting an investigation and certification of representatives pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, herein called the Act. On December 10, 1941 , the National Labor Relations Board , herein called the Board, acting pursuant to Section 9 (c) of the Act, and Article III, Section 3, of National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations-Series 2, as amended , ordered an investigation and authorized the Regional 38 N. L . R. B., No. 171. 951 952 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Director to conduct it and to provide for an appropriate hearing upon due notice. On December 11, 1941, the Regional Director issued a notice of hearing, copies of which were duly served upon the Company and the Union. Pursuant to the notice and amendments thereto, duly served upon the Company and the Union, a hearing was held De- cember 18, 1941, at New Orleans, Louisiana, before C. Paul Barker, the Trial Examiner duly designated by the Chief Trial Examiner. The Company was represented by counsel and the Union by its repre- sentatives; both participated in the hearing. Full opportunity to be heard, to examine and cross-examine witnesses, and to introduce evidence bearing on the issues was afforded both parties. During the course of the hearing the Trial Examiner made various rulings on motions and on objections to the admission of evidence. The Board has reviewed the rulings of the Trial Examiner and finds that (no prejudicial errors were committed. The rulings are hereby affirmed. On January 2, 1941, the Company filed a brief which has been con- sidered by the Board. Upon the entire record in the case the Board makes the following : FINDINGS OF FACT 1. THE BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY Lengsfield Brothers, Inc., is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Louisiana, having its principal office and place of business at New Orleans, Louisiana. The Company is engaged in the manufacture and distribution of paper boxes and folding cartons. During 1941 the Company pur- chased more than $150,000 worth of raw materials, consisting of paper board, glue, and ink, of which more than 80 percent was shipped to the Company's plant in New Orleans from points out- side the State of Louisiana. During the same period the Company manufactured finished products worth more than $150,000, of which approximately 20 percent was sold and shipped to customers outside the State of Louisiana. The Company employs approximately 100 employees. The Company stipulated that it is engaged in commerce within the meaning of the Act. H. THE ORGANIZATION INVOLVED Folding Box Workers Union, No. 500, International Printing Pressmen and Assistants Union of North America, is a labor organi- zation affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, admitting to membership certain of the Company's employees. LENGSFIELD BROTHERS, INC. III. THE APPROPRIATE UNIT 953 The Union in its petition requested a unit of all the Company's employees in the printing and folding box departments, excluding supervisory and office employees. The Company urges that all its employees, excluding supervisory and office employees, constitute an appropriate unit, contending that it has no definable printing or folding box departments. The Company manufactures both folding boxes, which are cut, creased, and glued or stitched, and delivered to the customer flat; and set-up boxes, which are delivered to the customer in their final set-up form. The Company's plant consists of a 3-story building containing about 100 employees. Harry Lengsfield superintends the operations of the plant as a whole. One foreman under Lengsfield supervises operations on the first floor of the plant, and a second foreman supervises operations on the second and third floors. All printing is carried on on the first floor, although the printing presses are not isolated from the other operations taking place on that floor. Printing operations are performed about equally on folding and set-up boxes. The rest of the operations on the first floor consist of cutting and creasing paper board, glueing, paper- cutting, peeling and punching,' and receiving and shipping. Most folding boxes are completed in operations on the first floor, except such as must go to the second floor for stitching or set-up parts. On the second floor the plant has other lighter machine operations which include scoring, corner-cutting, paper-cutting, partition-slot- ting, and stitching ; and, in general, set-up boxes are completed on the second floor except for such printing work as it may be neces- sary to do on the first floor printing presses. Some set-up boxes, however, require a combination of operations such as the insertion of collapsible parts or partitions, which involves their being processed on the first floor machines. There appears to be considerable interchange, between the first and second floors, of employees who do not work regularly on a particular machine. Thus the glueing machine on the first floor, once it has been set up by the glueing machine man, is at times operated by women who ordinarily work on set-up boxes; and the paper-cutting machine on the first floor, which is used to cut material both for folding and for set-up boxes, is at times operated by men who regu- larly work on the second floor. Similarly, the stitching and bending operations on the second floor, which appear to be performed on fold- I Peelers and punchers strip the waste sections from paper board that has been stamped and cut on the presses. 954 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ing boxes alone, are sometimes carried on by women who are ordi- narily engaged in work on set-up boxes.' The Union, at the hearing, described the unit it claims as in- cluding printing and other pressmen and their assistants, men who help around the presses, the typesetters, the die setters, the glueing machine man, stitchers, benders, peelers, and punchers, excluding foremen, "employees who work part time in the set-up box depart- ment," and office employees. All the employees whom the Union wishes to include, except stitchers, benders, peelers, and punchers, work regularly on the first floor. The stitchers, as noted above, operate a machine on the second floor and are assisted by the benders. Peelers and punchers work for the most part on the first floor, but are moved about to other floors if space requirements make it necessary. The unit sought by the Union thus is neither confined to the opera- tions traditionally included in the pressmen's craft, nor extended to include all the employees of the Company in an industrial unit; but constitutes, instead, an arbitrary and irregular grouping of craft and common-labor operations which does not follow any clearly discernible department lines. Lack of integration of the folding box department is evidenced, not only by the fact that the stitchers, the benders, and, at times, the peelers and punchers are supervised by the set-up box foreman on the second floor, but by the fact that, as stated above, a substantial number of employees divide their time between folding and set-up box work. Moreover, the unit described by the Union presents many diffi- culties of definition. The Union states, for example, that it wishes to include "peelers and punchers" and "help around the presses." It appears, however, that the same persons are not always engaged upon these operations, which are performed by a group of miscel- laneous common laborers employed in the plant, all of whom are shifted about as they are required on porter work, peeling and punching, taking material out of the presses, wrapping finished boxes as they come off the glueing and stitching machines, and storing and stacking. While it is clear that the Union does not wish to include all the members of this miscellaneous group, the Union has failed to show that those whom it does wish to include, under the heading of "peelers and punchers" or "help around the presses," spend more of their time at those operations than do others in the group. Similar difficulties are presented by the Union's desire to 'Although the wage -Hour Law requires a minimum hourly rate of 40 cents for em- ployees engaged in folding box operations and only 36 cents for those engaged in set-up box operations , as to employees of the Company the difference in rate serves to distinguish the operations of female employees only, since all male employees are paid at the minimum rate of 40 cents, regardless of operation. LENGSFIELD BROTHERS, INC. 955 exclude "employees who work part- time in the set-up box depart- ment" since, as stated above, the common laborers, stitchers, benders, and glueing machine operators, some of whom the Union wishes to include, are often engaged in work on set-up boxes. We are of the opinion that a unit such as that desired by the Union, which is not confined to any identifiable craft, department, operation, or group thereof, would not be one appropriate for the, purposes of collective bargaining. We believe, moreover, that the functions of all the employees in the plant are so closely interrelated, and their interests so similar, as to make inappropriate a unit com- prising only a part of the employees. The appropriateness of a larger unit is further evidenced by the fact that the Union, when first organized in the spring of 1941, did not confine its membership to employees in the so-called printing and folding box departments but also admitted employees engaged in set-up box operations,3 and by the fact that in similar companies other locals of the same Inter- national have organized employees engaged in both folding box and set-up box operations. In view of all the circumstances, we believe that the unit herein urged by the Union is inappropriate for the purposes of collective bargaining, and we so find. We shall, therefore, dismiss the petition. IV. THE QUESTION CONCERNING REPRESENTATION Since, as stated in Section III above, the bargaining unit sought, to be established by the petition is not appropriate, we find that no question has arisen concerning the representation of employees of the Company in an appropriate unit. Upon the basis of the above findings of fact and upon the entire record in the case, the Board makes the following : CONCLUSION OF LAW No question concerning representation of employees of Lengsfield Brothers, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, in a unit which is appro- priate for the purposes of collective bargaining, has arisen within the meaning of section 9 (c) of the National Labor Relations Act. s Subsequently , in August 1941, Sahuque , a representative of the American Federation of Labor, first became connected with the Union and advised organization of the printing and folding box departments only, since operations in these departments are largely per- formed on presses. Dues and fees already paid in by other employees were refunded. This policy was extended to other paper box companies in New Orleans over whom the Union claims jurisdiction . Sahuque testified that the jurisdiction of this local is now restricted to printing and folding box employees. 956 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD ORDER Upon the basis of the foregoing findings of fact, conclusion of law, and the entire record in the case, the National Labor Relations Board hereby orders that the petition for investigation and certifi- cation of representatives of employees of Lengsfield Brothers, Inc., New Orleans, Louisiana, filed by Folding Box Workers Union, No. 500, International Printing Pressmen and Assistants Union of North America, affiliated with the American Federation of Labor, be, and it hereby is, dismissed. Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation