Lawrence M. Bloch, Complainant,v.Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJul 24, 2009
0120092158 (E.E.O.C. Jul. 24, 2009)

0120092158

07-24-2009

Lawrence M. Bloch, Complainant, v. Eric K. Shinseki, Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs, Agency.


Lawrence M. Bloch,

Complainant,

v.

Eric K. Shinseki,

Secretary,

Department of Veterans Affairs,

Agency.

Appeal No. 0120092158

Agency No. 200H05232009100970

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the

agency's decision dated March 23, 2009, dismissing his complaint of

unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Section 501 of

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29

U.S.C. � 791 et seq. Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's

complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(2),

for untimely EEO Counselor contact.

In his complaint, complainant alleged that he was subjected to

discrimination on the basis of disability when he was terminated from

his position of Medical Supply Technician during his probationary period.

The record discloses that the alleged discriminatory event occurred

on October 17, 2008, but complainant did not initiate contact with an

EEO Counselor until December 16, 2008, which is beyond the forty-five

(45) day limitation period.1 On appeal, complainant has presented

no persuasive arguments or evidence warranting an extension of the

time limit for initiating EEO Counselor contact. Complainant states

that he has a psychological disorder that sends him into bouts of

depression. However, complainant did not submit any information or

evidence as to when he may have been incapacitated. We have consistently

held, in cases involving physical or mental health difficulties, that

an extension is warranted only where an individual is so incapacitated

by his condition that he is unable to meet the regulatory time limits.

See Davis v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request No. 05980475

(August 6, 1998); Crear v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Request

No. 05920700 (October 29, 1992). Complainant failed to show he was so

incapacitated that he could not timely contact the EEO counselor.

Accordingly, the agency's final decision dismissing complainant's

complaint is affirmed.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1208)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 77960,

Washington, DC 20013. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request

to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail

within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0408)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1008)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request from the Court that

the Court appoint an attorney to represent you and that the Court also

permit you to file the action without payment of fees, costs, or other

security. See Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended,

42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended,

29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The grant or denial of the request is within

the sole discretion of the Court. Filing a request for an attorney with

the Court does not extend your time in which to file a civil action.

Both the request and the civil action must be filed within the time

limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

July 24, 2009

__________________

Date

1 The record indicates that complainant also filed an appeal with the

Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), which dismissed the matter for

lack of jurisdiction. While the Commission would normally "unmix" the

matter, the MSPB decision notes that complainant filed his MSPB appeal

on December 16, 2008, the same date used by the agency in the instant

complaint. As such, there is no need to "unmix" the matter.

??

??

??

??

2

0120092158

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Office of Federal Operations

P.O. Box 77960

Washington, DC 20013

3

0120092158