Laura Thomas, Complainant,v.William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionFeb 24, 2000
01990282 (E.E.O.C. Feb. 24, 2000)

01990282

02-24-2000

Laura Thomas, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Laura Thomas v. United States Postal Service

01990282

February 24, 2000

Laura Thomas, )

Complainant, )

)

v. )

) Appeal No. 01990282

William J. Henderson, ) Agency No. 96-65923-044

Postmaster General, )

United States Postal Service, )

Agency. )

____________________________________)

DECISION

On October 6, 1998, complainant filed a timely complaint with this

Commission from a final agency decision (FAD), dated September 30, 1998,

dismissing her complaint on the grounds that it states the same claim

that has been decided by the agency.<1> The Commission accepts the

appeal in accordance with EEOC Order No. 960, as amended.

Complainant contacted the EEO office regarding allegations of

discrimination based on reprisal. Informal efforts to resolve

complainant's concerns were unsuccessful. Accordingly, on February 24,

1996, complainant filed a formal complaint.

The agency defined the allegations as follows:

Complainant's payroll records for pay periods ending 6/10/95, 6/24/95,

7/22/95, 8/5/95, and 8/19/95 were not corrected in an effort to force

her resignation; and,

To force her resignation, Mr. A returned to work, without complainant's

knowledge; telephoned complainant's shop supervisor; and came to

complainant's shop area in violation of restrictions placed on him.

In a FAD, dated April 19, 1996, the agency dismissed claim 2. The record

does not contain any evidence that indicates that complainant filed an

appeal from this FAD. Thereafter, on September 30, 1998, the agency

issued a FAD dismissing claim 1. The agency indicated that claim 1 was

previously decided by the agency in FAD dated January 21, 1997 (Case

No. DON 96-65923-056), which found no discrimination. Accordingly,

our review of the instant case is confined to the sole matter which

complainant raised on appeal: the dismissal of claim 1 in the September

30, 1998 FAD.

Volume 64 Fed. Regulation. 37,644, 37,656 (1999)(to be codified and

hereinafter cited as 29 C.F.R. �1614.107(a)(1)) provides that the agency

shall dismiss a complaint or a portion of a complaint that states the

same claim that is pending before or has been decided by the agency or

Commission. The Commission has interpreted this regulation to require

that the complaint must set forth the "identical matters" raised in

a previous complaint filed by the same complainant, in order for the

subsequent complaint to be rejected. See Russell v. Department of the

Army, EEOC Request No. 05910613 (August 1, 1991).

In the instant case, the agency dismissed claim 1 on the grounds that

the it has been addressed by the agency in Case No. DON 96-65923-056.

The record reveals that complainant's prior complaint includes the same

issue as described in claim 1. Therefore, the agency's decision to

dismiss claim 1 was proper and is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M1199)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, MUST BE

FILED WITH THE OFFICE OF FEDERAL OPERATIONS (OFO) WITHIN THIRTY (30)

CALENDAR DAYS of receipt of this decision or WITHIN TWENTY (20) CALENDAR

DAYS OF RECEIPT OF ANOTHER PARTY'S TIMELY REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION.

See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,659 (1999) (to be codified and hereinafter

referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.405). All requests and arguments must be

submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment

Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C. 20036. In the

absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed

timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of the expiration

of the applicable filing period. See 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644, 37,661 (1999)

(to be codified and hereinafter referred to as 29 C.F.R. �1614.604).

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the

other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. �1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S1199)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court WITHIN NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, YOU MUST NAME AS

THE DEFENDANT IN THE COMPLAINT THE PERSON WHO IS THE OFFICIAL AGENCY HEAD

OR DEPARTMENT HEAD, IDENTIFYING THAT PERSON BY HIS OR HER FULL NAME AND

OFFICIAL TITLE. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

February 24, 2000

____________________________

Date Carlton M. Hadden, Acting Director

Office of Federal Operations

CERTIFICATE OF MAILING

For timeliness purposes, the Commission will presume that this decision

was received within five (5) calendar days of mailing. I certify that

the decision was mailed to complainant, complainant's representative

(if applicable), and the agency on:

__________________ _____________________________

Date Equal Employment Assistant

1On November 9, 1999, revised regulations governing the EEOC's federal

sector complaint process went into effect. These regulations apply to all

federal sector EEO complaints pending at any stage in the administrative

process. Consequently, the Commission will apply the revised regulations

found at 64 Fed. Reg. 37,644 (1999), where applicable, in deciding the

present appeal. The regulations, as amended, may also be found at the

Commission's website at WWW.EEOC.GOV.