Kutsher's Country Club, Corp.Download PDFNational Labor Relations Board - Board DecisionsAug 31, 1971192 N.L.R.B. 1270 (N.L.R.B. 1971) Copy Citation 1270 DECISIONS OF NATIONAL {LABOR RELATIONS BOARD Iutsher's, Country Club, Corp. and Local 343,, Hotel and Restaurant ,Employees and Bartenders Interna- tional Union, AFL -CIO,= Petitioner. Case 3-RC-4788 - - August 31, 1971 DECISION ON REVIEW AND CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF SECOND ELECTION BY CHAIRMAN MILLER AND ME ERs FANNING AND JENKINS Pursuant to a Supplemental Decision and Direc- tion issued by the Regional Director for Region 3 on August 25, 1970, a rerun election by secret ballot was conducted under his direction and supervision on December 12, 1970. A tally of the ballots showed that of the approximately 207 eligible voters, 150 ballots were cast ; 22 for and 80 against the Petitioner; 45 ballots were challenged; and 3 ballots were void. The challenged ballots were not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. Thereafter, the Petitioner filed timely objections to conduct affecting the results of the election. On May 14, 1971, the Regional Director issued a Second Supplemental Decision and Direction of Third Election in which he overruled Petitioner's Objections 2, 3, and 4, but sustained Petitioner's Objection 1, finding that the Employer's refusal to permit Petitioner's representatives to come upon its premises to discuss unionization with employees constituted objectionable conduct which warranted setting aside the results of the rerun election and directing a third election. Thereafter, in accordance with Section 102.67 of the National Labor Relations Board Rules and Regulations and Statements of Procedure, Series 8, as amended, the Employer filed a timely Request for Review of the Regional Director's Second Supplemental Decision and Direc- tion of Third Election, contending that the Regional Director's findings with respect to the denial of access issue were erroneous. The Board by telegraphic order dated June 21, 1971, granted the Request for Review. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 3(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, the National Labor Relations Board has delegated its powers in connection with this case to a three- member panel. i The Petitioner submitted a document styled "Petitioner's Support" urging, inter alia, that Petitioner's Objections 2, 3, and 4 be sustained. To the extent that this document seeks to obtain review of the Regional Director's findings on those objections , review is hereby denied since that document was filed subsequent to the due date for a request for review and, in any event , raises no substantial issues warranting review. 2 While we recognize that the criteria applied in determining whether , The Board has considered the entire record in this case with respect to the issues under review, and makes-the following findings: The sole issue to be-decided on review concerns the validity of the Petitioner's, objection that the Employ- er refused to permit the Petitioner access to its premises.' The Employer operates a resort hotel in the Catskill Mountain area of New York, and, since its location is rural and relatively isolated , most employ- ees live, work, and spend a major portion of their free time on the Employer's premises where they are permitted free use of the hotel 's recreational facili- ties. The Employer's security guards patrol the area regularly to keep out unauthorized persons and, the only public property in the area which would allow the Petitioner access to employees is the public road which bisects the Employer's property and separates the employees ' living quarters from the guest and recreational facilities. The Regional Director, in finding that the employ- ees' crossing of this public road afforded no real opportunity for organizational communication and that the other channels of communication available to the Union were also inadequate , relied on the Board's decision in Kutsher's Hotel and Country Club, 175 NLRB No. 76. In that case , which involved the same parties and the same factual situation as the instant case , the Board found that the Employer's refusal to allow the Petitioner access to its premises constituted a violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the Act. However, in N.L.R.B. v. Kutsher's Hotel and Country Club, Inc., 427 F.2d 200 (C.A. 2, 1970), the court took a different view of the evidence and denied enforce- ment of the Board's order . The Board has deter- mined not to file a petition for certiorari to review the court's decision. Accordingly, for purposes of this proceeding only, the Board acquiesces in the court's interpretation of the evidence and deems its decision to be the law of the case.2 Hence we shall, contrary to the Regional Director, overrule the Petitioner's Objection I and certify the results of the election. CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS OF ELECTION It is hereby certified that a majority of the valid votes has not been cast for Local 343, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders International certain conduct intefered with an election are not identical to the criteria applied in determining whether an unfair labor practice has been committed, we are of the opinion that , within the confines of the court's decision in the related prior unfair labor practice case, the conduct complained of in Petitioner's Objection I herein would be insufficient to constitute a basis upon which to set aside the election. 192 NLRB No. 154 KUTSHER'S COUNTRY CLUB 1271 Union, AFL-CIO, and said organization is not the Section 9(a) of the National Labor Relations Act,, as exclusive representative of the Employer 's employees amended. in the appropriate unit, within the meaning of Copy with citationCopy as parenthetical citation