Kimberlie M. Powers, Complainant,v.Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionApr 10, 2002
01A04459 (E.E.O.C. Apr. 10, 2002)

01A04459

04-10-2002

Kimberlie M. Powers, Complainant, v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Agency.


Kimberlie M. Powers v. Department of Defense

01A04459

04-10-02

.

Kimberlie M. Powers,

Complainant,

v.

Donald H. Rumsfeld,

Secretary,

Department of Defense,

Defense Finance and Accounting Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A04459

Agency No. DFASCL000098009

Hearing No. 220-99-5086X

DISMISSAL OF APPEAL

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated April 10, 2000, addressing her complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq. In her

complaint, complainant alleged that she was subjected to discrimination

on the basis of sex (female) when she was sexually harassed by a co-worker

on March 17, 1998 and management took no action.

For the following reasons, the Commission DISMISSES complainant's appeal.

The record reveals that complainant, a Contact Representative, GS-5, at

the agency's Finance Operations Call Center, Field Assistance Division,

Directorate for Field Support, Finance Operations, Defense Finance and

Accounting Service, in Cleveland, Ohio, filed a formal EEO complaint

with the agency on June 12, 1998, alleging that the agency discriminated

against her as referenced above. At the conclusion of the investigation,

complainant received a copy of the investigative report and requested

a hearing before an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ). The AJ issued a

decision without a hearing, finding no discrimination. The agency's

final agency action implemented the AJ decision. From this decision

complainant appeals.

The record reveals that, on October 10, 2000, complainant filed a civil

action (identified as Civil Action No. 100CV2575) in the United States

District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

The record further discloses that the allegations raised therein are the

same as those raised in the instant complaint. The regulation found at

29 C.F.R. � 1614.409 provides that the filing of a civil action "shall

terminate Commission processing of the appeal." Commission regulations

mandate dismissal of the EEO complaint under these circumstances so as to

prevent a complainant from simultaneously pursuing both administrative and

judicial remedies on the same matters, wasting resources, and creating

the potential for inconsistent or conflicting decisions, and in order

to grant due deference to the authority of the federal district court.

See Stromgren v. Department of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 05891079

(May 7, 1990); Sandy v. Department of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. 01893513

(October 19, 1989); Kotwitz v. USPS, EEOC Request No. 05880114 (October

25, 1988). Accordingly, complainant's appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.409.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this

case if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation

of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies,

practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for

29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests

and arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal

Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848,

Washington, D.C. 20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the

request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by

mail within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period.

See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604. The request or opposition must also include

proof of service on the other party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only

in very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as

the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head

or department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your

case in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization,

and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you

file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil

action will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII

of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.;

the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c).

The grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of

the Court. Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time

in which to file a civil action. Both the request and the civil action

must be filed within the time limits as stated in the paragraph above

("Right to File A Civil Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

____04-10-02______________

Date