Khristopher B. Oliver, Complainant,v.John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionJun 20, 2006
01A62284 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 20, 2006)

01A62284

06-20-2006

Khristopher B. Oliver, Complainant, v. John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.


Khristopher B. Oliver,

Complainant,

v.

John E. Potter,

Postmaster General,

United States Postal Service,

Agency.

Appeal No. 01A62284

Agency No. 1G787000206

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with this Commission from the agency's

decision dated February 6, 2006, dismissing his complaint of unlawful

employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

of 1964 (Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.

In the instant complaint, filed on January 30, 2006, complainant claimed

that he was subjected to discrimination on the basis of reprisal for prior

protected EEO activity when:

on October 3, 2005, he was denied employment with the Postal Service

as a part-time Flexible Mail Processing Clerk.

In its February 6, 2006 decision, the agency dismissed the complaint

pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a claim.

Specifically, the agency found that the complainant failed to provide a

basis for the alleged discrimination, as there is no record of prior EEO

activity on the part of the complainant.

Upon review, the Commission finds that complainant's complaint was properly

dismissed pursuant to 29 C.F.R. � 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a

claim of reprisal, on the grounds that the complaint did not fall within

the purview of the EEO process. The January 30, 2006 complaint identified

the matter giving rise to the complaint as previous union activity. The

basis of reprisal was the only basis of discrimination identified by the

complainant, and there is no evidence that he engaged in EEO or any other

protected activity. When a complaint of reprisal fails to identify EEO or

other protected activity, the complaint is not within the purview of Title

VII and must be dismissed for failure to state a claim. See Bryant v.

Department of Justice, EEOC Request No. 05980273 (June 4, 1999).

Accordingly, the Commission finds that the complaint fails to state a claim

under the EEOC regulations, and the agency's final decision dismissing

complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL

RECONSIDERATION (M0701)

The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case

if the complainant or the agency submits a written request containing

arguments or evidence which tend to establish that:

1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous

interpretation of material fact or law; or

2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the

policies, practices, or operations of the agency.

Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed

with the Office of Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar

days of receipt of this decision or within twenty (20) calendar days of

receipt of another party's timely request for reconsideration. See 29

C.F.R. � 1614.405; Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29

C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110), 9-18 (November 9, 1999). All requests and

arguments must be submitted to the Director, Office of Federal Operations,

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, P.O. Box 19848, Washington, D.C.

20036. In the absence of a legible postmark, the request to reconsider

shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail within five days of

the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604.

The request or opposition must also include proof of service on the other

party.

Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your

request for reconsideration as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances

prevented the timely filing of the request. Any supporting documentation

must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The Commission

will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in

very limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. � 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT'S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0900)

You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States

District Court within ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you

receive this decision. If you file a civil action, you must name as the

defendant in the complaint the person who is the official agency head or

department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and

official title. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of your case

in court. "Agency" or "department" means the national organization, and

not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you file

a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action

will terminate the administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z1199)

If you decide to file a civil action, and if you do not have or cannot

afford the services of an attorney, you may request that the Court appoint

an attorney to represent you and that the Court permit you to file the

action without payment of fees, costs, or other security. See Title VII of

the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. � 2000e et seq.; the

Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. �� 791, 794(c). The

grant or denial of the request is within the sole discretion of the Court.

Filing a request for an attorney does not extend your time in which to file

a civil action. Both the request and the civil action must be filed within

the time limits as stated in the paragraph above ("Right to File A Civil

Action").

FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________

Carlton M. Hadden, Director

Office of Federal Operations

June 20, 2006

__________________

Date