Kevin M. Franken,1 Complainant,v.Dr. Mark T. Esper, Secretary, Department of the Army, Agency.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Nov 23, 2018

2018000019 (E.E.O.C. Nov. 23, 2018)

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
Office of Federal Operations
P.O. Box 77960
Washington, DC 20013

Kevin M. Franken,1
Complainant,

v.

Dr. Mark T. Esper,
Secretary,
Department of the Army,
Agency.

Appeal No. 2018000019

Agency No. ARCESAC18JUN02636

DECISION

Complainant filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC
or Commission) from the Agency's decision dated August 9, 2018, dismissing his complaint of
unlawful employment discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
(Title VII), as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(Rehabilitation Act), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 791 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq.

BACKGROUND

At the time of events giving rise to this complaint, Complainant was a former Natural Resources
Specialist at the Agency’s New Hogan Lake facility in Valley Springs, California. Complainant
was removed from his position in April 2017. He appealed his removal to the Merit Systems
Protection Board (MSPB).

On July 28, 2018, Complainant filed a formal complaint alleging that the Agency subjected him
to discrimination on the bases of sex, religion, disability, age, and reprisal when: (1) on May 10,
11,and 15, 2018, named Agency officials made false, inaccurate, and misleading statements
when they testified at the MSPB hearing pertaining to his termination; and (2) on May 10, 11,
and 15, 2018, he became aware that he was the topic of office gossip from the summer of 2015
to April 21, 2017, when several of his previous coworkers made false, inaccurate, and misleading

1 We note that in his appeal, Complainant states that he does not want a pseudonym used on the
caption of this decision, as is the usual practice of this Commission.

2018000019

2
statements during the MSPB hearing pertaining to his termination.

The Agency dismissed the complaint pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) for failure to state a
claim. The instant appeal followed.

ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS

The regulation set forth at 29 C.F.R. § 1614.107(a)(1) provides, in relevant part, that an agency
shall dismiss a complaint that fails to state a claim. An agency shall accept a complaint from any
aggrieved employee or applicant for employment who believes that he or she has been
discriminated against by that agency because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or
disabling condition. 29 C.F.R. §§ 1614.103, .106(a). The Commission's federal sector case
precedent has long defined an "aggrieved employee" as one who suffers a present harm or loss
with respect to a term, condition, or privilege of employment for which there is a remedy. Diaz
v. Dep’t of the Air Force, EEOC Request No. 05931049 (Apr. 21, 1994).

The Commission has held that an employee cannot use the EEO complaint process to lodge a
collateral attack on another adjudicatory proceeding. See Wills v. Department of Defense,
EEOC Request No. 05970596 (July 30, 1998); Kleinman v. United States Postal Service, EEOC
Request No. 05940585 (September 22, 1994); Lingad v. United States Postal Service, EEOC
Request No. 05930106 (June 25, 1993). In his complaint, Complainant alleged discrimination
when people from the Agency gave what he viewed as false, inaccurate, and misleading
testimony during his MSPB hearing. The EEO process is not the proper forum for Complainant
to have raised this challenge. As Complainant is challenging actions directly related to the
adjudication of his MSPB appeal, he must raise such claims with the MSPB, not through an EEO
complaint.

Accordingly, the Agency's final decision dismissing Complainant's complaint is AFFIRMED.

STATEMENT OF RIGHTS - ON APPEAL
RECONSIDERATION (M0617)
The Commission may, in its discretion, reconsider the decision in this case if the Complainant or
the Agency submits a written request containing arguments or evidence which tend to establish
that:
1. The appellate decision involved a clearly erroneous interpretation of material fact
or law; or
2. The appellate decision will have a substantial impact on the policies, practices, or
operations of the Agency.
Requests to reconsider, with supporting statement or brief, must be filed with the Office of
Federal Operations (OFO) within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this decision.
2018000019

3
A party shall have twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of another party’s timely request for
reconsideration in which to submit a brief or statement in opposition. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.405;
Equal Employment Opportunity Management Directive for 29 C.F.R. Part 1614 (EEO MD-110),
at Chap. 9 § VII.B (Aug. 5, 2015). All requests and arguments must be submitted to the
Director, Office of Federal Operations, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Complainant’s request may be submitted via regular mail to P.O. Box 77960, Washington, DC
20013, or by certified mail to 131 M Street, NE, Washington, DC 20507. In the absence of a
legible postmark, the request to reconsider shall be deemed timely filed if it is received by mail
within five days of the expiration of the applicable filing period. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604. The
agency’s request must be submitted in digital format via the EEOC’s Federal Sector EEO Portal
(FedSEP). See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(g). The request or opposition must also include proof of
service on the other party.
Failure to file within the time period will result in dismissal of your request for reconsideration
as untimely, unless extenuating circumstances prevented the timely filing of the request. Any
supporting documentation must be submitted with your request for reconsideration. The
Commission will consider requests for reconsideration filed after the deadline only in very
limited circumstances. See 29 C.F.R. § 1614.604(c).

COMPLAINANT’S RIGHT TO FILE A CIVIL ACTION (S0610)
You have the right to file a civil action in an appropriate United States District Court within
ninety (90) calendar days from the date that you receive this decision. If you file a civil action,
you must name as the defendant in the complaint the person who is the official Agency head or
department head, identifying that person by his or her full name and official title. Failure to do
so may result in the dismissal of your case in court. “Agency” or “department” means the
national organization, and not the local office, facility or department in which you work. If you
file a request to reconsider and also file a civil action, filing a civil action will terminate the
administrative processing of your complaint.

RIGHT TO REQUEST COUNSEL (Z0815)
If you want to file a civil action but cannot pay the fees, costs, or security to do so, you may
request permission from the court to proceed with the civil action without paying these fees or
costs. Similarly, if you cannot afford an attorney to represent you in the civil action, you may
request the court to appoint an attorney for you. You must submit the requests for waiver of
court costs or appointment of an attorney directly to the court, not the Commission.
2018000019

4
The court has the sole discretion to grant or deny these types of requests. Such requests do not
alter the time limits for filing a civil action (please read the paragraph titled Complainant’s Right
to File a Civil Action for the specific time limits).
FOR THE COMMISSION:

______________________________ Carlton M. Hadden’s signature
Carlton M. Hadden, Director
Office of Federal Operations

November 23, 2018
Date